1 / 8

IMC 1 as an Educational Experience (overall satisfaction)

IMC 1 as an Educational Experience (overall satisfaction). 40.2. 31.6. 22. 2.6. 3.7. Very Dissatisfying Very Satisfying Mean = 3.1, 106 ranked > 3. Top Ranked Features in terms of enhancing learning. Cases on real companies (mean = 4.08, 244>3) In-class Exercises (mean = 3.69, 186>3)

trevet
Download Presentation

IMC 1 as an Educational Experience (overall satisfaction)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IMC 1 as an Educational Experience(overall satisfaction) 40.2 31.6 22 2.6 3.7 Very Dissatisfying Very Satisfying Mean = 3.1, 106 ranked > 3

  2. Top Ranked Featuresin terms of enhancing learning • Cases on real companies (mean = 4.08, 244>3) • In-class Exercises (mean = 3.69, 186>3) • Plant tours (mean = 3.51, 163>3) • Team Teaching (mean = 3.29, 147>3) • UO Project (mean = 3.27, 137>3)

  3. Top Ranked Featuresin terms of increasing frustration • Confusion about assignments (mean = 1.72, 243<3) • Syllabus confusion (mean = 1.76, 241<3) • Course assignment workload (mean = 1.82, 238<3) • Outside speaker schedule (mean = 1.84, 231<3) • Pacing of assignments (mean = 1.91, 224<3)

  4. Workload Per Credit workload rated more-to-much more than other courses (mean 4.39, 238>3) # of responses; Outside hours # of responses; “lost” hours

  5. Work MixLearning Improvement • IN-CLASS EXERCISES was most frequently (26-45%) cited as being beneficial to INCREASE across all 4 streams • An INCREASE in CASE PREPARATION was the second most frequently cited (14-20%) as being beneficial in 3 streams • Others: • Plant tours #2 in UO, #3 in UPS • Wall Street Journal #3 in UFM • Homework and Quizzes #3 in UMR

  6. Work MixLearning Improvement • A DECREASE in READING ASSIGNMENTS was cited either most or second most frequently (19-47%) as beneficial to improved learning • A DECREASE in HOMEWORK was the next most often cited (18-24%) as beneficial to improved learning • Others: • Group projects #1 in UO • Quizzes tied for #2 in UMR

  7. Assistance with LearningIMC Material • The % of students who have sought assistance from faculty members varies by stream: • UO:63% UPS: 64% UFM: 45% UMR: 59% • In the aggregate, 70% of students who sought assistance found the faculty responsive to very responsive (above 3 on a 1 - 5 scale, where 5 was very responsive and 1 was unresponsive) • UO: 59% UPS: 63% UFM: 50% UMR: 73% • 68% of the students surveyed have never sought help from the mentors at the Management Resource Center

  8. Integration • Linkage within streams is more apparent than linkage across streams • On a scale of 1, very little linkage, to 5, very great linkage, the average perception is: • Across 4 streams: 2.86 • UPS: 3.36 UFM: 2.99 UMR: 4.04 • In the aggregate, about half of the respondents rated within stream linkage as 4 or 5 (78% 3 or above)

More Related