Subdivision Development Within Irrigation Districts

1. Subdivision Development Within Irrigation Districts Dealing with the Conflict Between Irrigation Water Use and Residential Development

2. Today’s Presentation • Introduction • Wyoming Subdivision Statute • Wyoming County Summary • Wyoming’s Population Growth • Issues Raised by Subdivision Development • County Planning Process – Irrigation District’s Role • Wheatland Irrigation District Example • Conclusion

3. I. Introduction • Wyoming Subdivision Statutes • Summary of Wyoming Counties’ Subdivision Regulations • Wyoming Growth Patterns • WWDC Irrigation System Survey Report

4. Authority Definitions Exemptions Permit Required Enforcement Minimum Requirements Planning Commission Board Approval Permit Fee Investigatory Powers Penalties Minimum Provisions Wyoming Subdivision Statute (18-5-301 – 18-5-315)

5. W.S. 18-5-301: Authority • Vested in Board of County Commissioners in which the land is located • Each County approaches this Issue Differently

6. W.S. 18-5-302: Definitions • Person: includes individual, corporation, association. • Subdivision: creation of division of a lot, tract, parcel or other unit of land for immediate or future purpose of sale or development for residential, recreational, industrial, commercial or public uses. • Water Supply System: . . .Separate water supply systems used solely for irrigation or stock water are not included.

7. W.S. 18-5-303: Exemptions from Provisions • Single Gift or Sale to Member of Landowner’s Immediate Family • Eminent Domain • Boundary Line Adjustments • Creates Cemetery Lots • Parcels are 35 Acres or Larger

8. W.S. 18-5-304: Permit Required • No person shall subdivide land or commence the physical layout or construction of a subdivision without first obtaining a subdivision permit from the board of the county in which the land is located.

9. W.S. 18-5-305: Enforcement • In accordance with Wyoming Administrative Procedures Act • Counties shall adopt rules and regulations as necessary to implement provisions of Act and insure compliance with intent and purpose of the article

10. Compliance with zoning regulations Survey Plat Title Sewage System Study Easements Water Supply System Study Roadway Access Evidence of Financial Resources Proof of Notice Water Rights Conservation District review (60 days) DEQ Review of sewage and water supply systems (30 days) W.S. 18-5-306: Minimum Requirements for Permits

11. W.S. 18-5-306(a)(xi): Appurtenant Water Rights • Prior to Final Approval, subdivider shall provide: • Evidence of relinquishment to SEO (Authorization to Detach) OR • Evidence of petitions to Board of Control OR • Water Distribution Plan approved by SEO AND • If located within Irrigation District, evidence that plan has been submitted AND • Evidence of notice on all offers and solicitations

12. The Subdivision Gap • The Board may EXEMPT from the minimum requirements the subdivision of one or more units of land into not more than a total of five units of land • Lots that are 35 acres or larger are EXEMPT

13. W.S. 18-5-307: Planning Commission • Board may delegate ability to receive and evaluate applications to Planning Commission • Planning Commission may make findings and recommendations to Board within 45 days

14. W.S. 18-5-308: Board Approval • Board shall approve or disapprove subdivision application and issue permit: • Within 45 days after receiving Planning Commission recommendation • If no Planning Commission, within 60 days after DEQ recommendation

15. W.S. 18-5-309: Permit Fee • Greater of $100 or $10/lot • Maximum Fee = $1,000

16. W.S. 18-5-311: Investigatory Powers • Board has ability to investigate • Board may: • Administer oaths; • Adduce evidence; • Require production • Request Court Orders

17. W.S. 18-5-312: Enforcement • Enforceable by all appropriate legal remedies including to, but not limited to: • Injunctive Relief • Writ of Mandamus • Board may request Attorney General to initiate civil or criminal proceedings

18. W.S. 18-5-313: False Statements; Penalty • False statements in publication or advertisement is punishable by: • Imprisonment for a period not to exceed 30 days; OR • Fined not to exceed $500 • Each day of violation constitutes a new offense

19. W.S. 18-5-314: Penalties • Any person who willfully violates any provision of the Article is subject to: • Imprisonment not to exceed 30 days; OR • Fined not more than $500 • Each day of violation constitutes a new offense

20. W.S. 18-5-315: Provisions Minimum • Boards may enact regulations that are more restrictive • Local provisions are not superseded by Article provisions

21. Summary of County Subdivision Regulations Provides website or other contact information Provides regulation dates

22. Wyoming Population Change (1990-2000) • 1970-1983: • 50% Increase • 1983-1990: • 10% Decrease • 1990-2000: • Growth Rate = 8.9% • Wyoming Ranked 32nd

23. Colorado = 30.6% Utah = 29.6% Idaho = 28.5% Montana = 12.9% National Average = 13.2% South Dakota = 8.5% Nebraska = 8.4% North Dakota = .5% Comparison Growth

24. Wyoming County Growth (1990-2000) • Teton County = 63.3% • Jackson = 93.4% • Sublette County = 22.2% • Lincoln County = 15.4% • Afton, Alpine, and Thayne = 45.6%

25. Other Counties Exceeding State Average Growth Rate • Johnson = 15.1% • Campbell = 14.7% • Sheridan = 12.7% • Laramie = 11.6% • Park = 11.3%

26. Counties Losing Population • Carbon = -6.1% • Niobrara = -3.7% • Sweetwater = -3.1% • Washakie = -1.2%

27. Causes of Population Growth • Natural Increase • Births exceeding deaths among current residents • 75% of 8.9% Growth • In-Migration • Net in-migration of individuals from outside the region • 25% of 8.9% Growth

28. Teton Sublette Johnson Sheridan Park Crook Big Horn Platte In-Migration Growth

29. Uinta Albany Weston Goshen Washakie Sweetwater Niobrara Carbon Counties with Out-Migration

30. Rural Growth Areas Sublette Lincoln Crook Fremont Urban Growth Areas Natrona Rural vs. “Urban” Growth

31. Wyoming’s Second Home Growth (1990-2000) • 3,000 new housing units in State • Represents 14% of total increase in housing units • 5.5% of Wyoming’s housing units are second homes

32. Second Home Growth (cont) • Increased by more than 30% • National Average = 16.1% • Utah = 41.2%

33. Hot Springs = 300% Niobrara = 200% Campbell = 159% Sweetwater = 77.4% Uinta = 75.4% Goshen = 57.8% Big Horn = 0.4% Johnson = -2.5% Wyoming County Second Home Growth (1990-2000)

34. Montana = 5.9% Idaho = 5.1% Colorado = 4% Utah = 3.9% South Dakota = 3% Nebraska = 1.6% National Average = 3.1% Wyoming = 5.5% 11th Nationally Neighboring States % of Second Homes

35. Sublette County = 26% Teton County = 20% Lincoln County = 13.4% Carbon County = 12.6% Sweetwater County = 2% Campbell County = 2% Wyoming Counties Second Home Statistics

36. Future Development • American Farmland Trust Study • Estimates more than 24 million acres of western ranchland will be replaced by housing developments by 2020 • Lists 2.6 million acres in Wyoming as “vulnerable ranchlands”

37. WWDC Irrigation System Survey Report - 2003 • Approximately 176 Entities Surveyed • 22 Reported Subdivisions as Problems • Many who have problems, didn’t report

38. II. Issues Raised in Districts by Subdivisions • Inadequacy of Delivery Systems • Ground Water Impacts • Quantity • Quality • Liability Concerns

39. Inadequacy of Delivery Systems • Irrigation Systems not Constructed to Deliver Water to Small Acreages • Historical Points of Diversion and Means of Conveyance

40. Ground Water Impacts • Reduction of Surface Irrigation results in: • Ground Water Quantity Reductions • Ground Water Quality Concerns

41. Recent Study • Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Report on the Yellowstone Valley • West of Billings

42. Study Results - Quantity • 80-90% of groundwater is historically from irrigation • From 1990-2000 • Population increased 26% • Irrigated Lands decreased 23%

43. Study Results - Quantity • When subdivisions consume irrigated fields – the residents may well be depleting the very ground water they hope to tap

44. Study Results - Quality • Water quality depends on irrigation to dilute concentrations of nitrates and dissolved solids. • As irrigation is lost with the shift from agricultural lands to subdivisions, the aquifer’s ability to dilute and flush nitrates and dissolved solids is also reduced.

45. Liability Concerns • Always an Issue • Increased Population increases chances of incidents

46. Liability Concerns • Yuma, Arizona Planning and Zoning Commission • Requires all developments to construct barrier walls along all irrigation district open-water conveyances • Required in all areas: subdivisions, industrial and commercial

47. III. County Planning Process • Review County’s Existing Subdivision Regulations • Potential Modification of County Subdivision Regulations • Wheatland Irrigation District Example

48. Wheatland Irrigation District Example • Existing Process • Permit Application Completed • Request for Comment Circulated • District analyze situation • District Prepared Comment Letter • District Attend Planning Commission • District Attend County Commission

49. Wheatland Irrigation District Example • Amendment to Platte County Regulations • Approval from District is Required Prior to Application being Deemed Complete

50. Wheatland Irrigation District Example • Chapter III – Permit Applications Procedures • Section 3b – Minimum Requirements • The following items must accompany every submittal • “Approval from the Wheatland Irrigation District on a form adopted by the District regarding attached water rights.”