710 likes | 880 Views
Method . National family opinion panel80,000 households Balanced to key census variablesHIA survey in 1984 used NFOAll MarkeTrak surveysScreening Question
E N D
1. MarkeTrak VI:Hearing Aid Industry Market Tracking Survey 1984-2000 Sergei Kochkin, Ph.D.
Knowles Electronics, Inc.
February 27, 2002
2. Method National family opinion panel
80,000 households
Balanced to key census variables
HIA survey in 1984 used NFO
All MarkeTrak surveys
Screening Question – Phase I (November 2000)
“Does anyone in your household have a hearing difficulty in one or both ears without the use of a hearing aid?”
Physician screening for hearing loss during last physical within last six months.
Self, Spouse, Other, Child (Under age 18)
15,800 hearing-impaired individuals
72% response rate
3. Method Hearing Aid Owner Survey - Phase II
Detailed questionnaire 3,000 hearing aid owners based on Phase I response.
Response rate 87%
Topics:
Customer satisfaction (more than 50 areas)
Hearing aid usage (e.g. hours worn)
Use of ALDs
First time user influences
Brand selection
Factors impacting choice of audiologist/dispenser
Suggestions for improving hearing aids
Perceived quality of life changes
Use of computers in hearing healthcare
4. Hearing Aid Market Penetration has Historically been low (1 in 5).
5. Hearing-impaired User & Non-user Population
6. Hearing Loss Population by Age GroupOwners versus Non-owners (2000)
7. Clinton Announcement Spurred “Baby Boomer” Potential Market Growth Clinton news release 10/97.
M5 Survey taken 11/97.
Age 45-54 hearing loss growth =23%
$60k growth =35%
Some college growth = 30%
Growth continues.
But penetration among “Boomers” unchanged.
8. Little Change in Market Penetration by Age Since 1989
9. Physician Screening for Hearing Loss During Physical Exam
10. Binaural Penetration Trend
11. Hearing Instrument Fittings by Perceived Profession
12. Hearing Instrument Fittings by Source of Distribution
13. Current Hearing Aid Owners by Source of Distribution
14. Factors Impacting Choice of Dispensing Practice (n=2,251)(Importance scores =4-5 on 5 point scale)
15. Third-party Payment Trend
16. Average Retail Price Paid by Consumer (includes free, direct mail hearing aids, & third-party discounts)
17. Age of Hearing Instrument
18. First Time User Rate
19. Factors Influencing New First Time Users to Purchase Factors less than 10% mentions:
Ad-magazine (3%)
HL Literature (2%)
Boss/co-worker (5%)
Newspaper (6%)
Direct mail (5%)
Ad - TV (2%)
Ad – radio (0%)
Telemarketing (0%)
20. Physician Recommendation Trends 1989 - HIA advertising to physician.
Current initiatives:
AAA Best Practice
BHI Referral program
Trends + , but not enough.
Family doctor – single most important influencer of hearing aid purchase.
21. Factors Influencing New First Time Users to Purchase Notable changes since last MarkeTrak:
Audiologist influence increased to 40.5% - up from 26% in 1997.
ENT influence increased to 22.1% - up from 10.8% in 1997.
“Free” hearing aid influence nearly doubled.
22. Factors Considered Helpful or Reliable When Choosing Brand of Hearing Aid (n=2,273)(Helpfulness/reliability scores =4-5 on 5 point scale)
23. Average Age of New Users
24. New User Mean Household Income
25. U.S. Customer Satisfaction TrendsNo significant differences (H.A. <5 years.)
26. U.S. Customer Satisfaction TrendsNew Hearing Aids (< 1 year)
27. Hearing Aids “In the Drawer”
28. Hearing Aid Improvements Sought by Current Hearing Aid Owners (n=2,428)(Highly desirable scores =4-5 on 5 point scale)
29. Hearing Aid Improvements Sought by Current Hearing Aid Owners (n=2,428)(Desirable scores =4-5 on 5 point scale)
30. Non-owner Demography“The Opportunity”
31. The Non-Owner OpportunitiesSelf-admitted Hearing LossGender (Millions)
32. The Non-Owner Opportunities by Age Classification
33. The Non-Owner Opportunities by Household Income
34. The Non-Owner Opportunities by Level of Education
35. The Non-Owner Opportunities by Employment Status
36. The Non-Owner Opportunities by Metro-size
37. The Hearing-Impaired Market by State:Self-admitted Hearing Loss Top 10 states
California
Texas
New York
Florida
Pennsylvania
Illinois
Ohio
Michigan
Georgia
North Carolina
38. Conclusions Hearing-impaired population > to 28.6 million.
Major increases in “Baby Boomer” and 75+ age brackets.
Penetration increased to 22.2%:
Free and direct mail impact
Physician screenings declined to 14%.
Overall customer satisfaction unchanged.
New hearing aid satisfaction on decline
Hearing aids in the drawer improved to 11.7%.
Audiologist influence in dispensing continues to grow.
39. Conclusions New user rate has dropped to 31.6%.
Average age increase to 69
Household income increase to $46.3k
Binaural rate is at an all time high of 84.5% for bilateral loss consumers.
Third-party payments continue to increase.
“Out-of-pocket” retail price to consumer increased 67% since 1994.
“Baby-boomer” age wave continues to grow with no indication that industry has tapped this segment.
40. Conclusions The top hearing aid improvements sought by current hearing aid owners:
Hearing in noise
Better sound quality
Less whistling & feedback
Lower price
More soft sounds
Least important improvements:
Leasing a hearing aid
Color of hearing aid
More fashionable hearing aids
41. Conclusions Top factors in choosing dispenser:
Professionalism
Convenient location
Convenient hours
Price
Top factors considered to be helpful and reliable when choosing a hearing aid brand:
Medical doctor recommendation
AARP recommendation
Manufacturer website
Hearing instrument specialist recommendation
42. Key Findings from Knowles Market Development Studies
43. The Decision To Purchase a Hearing Aid is Very Complex and Little Understood
44. The Relationship Between Ad Expenditures & Hearing Aid Sales is Weak
45. The Issue of Price & Value
46. Customer Satisfaction with “Value” = Price/performanceHearing aids 1-5 years of age
47. Satisfaction Highly Related to How Much $$ the Consumer Pays to Solve Their Problem
48. Hearing Aid Prices are Inelastic at Higher Prices & Highly Elastic at Low Prices
49. Stigma & Price Are Not the Only Barriers to Market Growth
50. The Issue of Stigma
51. Invisible Hearing Aids Have Greater Consumer Acceptance
52. Invisible Hearing Aids Have Greater Consumer Acceptance
53. Invisible Hearing Aids Have Greater Consumer Acceptance
54. Can Positive Role Models Help Consumers Overcome Stigma? Only Two examples I am aware of in our industry:
President Reagan – 1983 (associated with 20% growth)
Eddie Albert in Beltone commercials – 1989
Apparent Clinton effect in Fall of 1997
Probable impact on admission of hearing loss by male “baby-boomers”
No impact on sales to date
55. What is The Viable Market for Hearing Aids?
56. Market Penetration is Highly Related to Recognition of Hearing Loss Handicap
57. Discriminant Function Probability of Non-owner Resembling Current HA Owner Based on Multiple Subjective Hearing Loss Measures.
58. Four Methods of Measuring Viable US Hearing Aid Market Based totally on hearing loss measures the additional possible market growth is:
Gallaudet Scores (est. dB Loss Better ear) = 125%
Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHIE) = 154%
APHAB = 127%
Discriminant Function Modeling = 102%
Clear that the current market could easily double based totally on hearing handicap.
And, even more based on situational need.
59. Why Buy Hearing Aids?
60. Attitudes Per Se are Important, But Relationship to Hearing Aid Purchase Intent is Perhaps More Important Sample of 2,753 non-owners
Measured their attitudes on 76 issues.
Measured their hearing aid purchase intent in the next five years.
Categorized them as a high or low purchase intenders.
Took ratio of high/low purchase intenders for each attitude item.
Ranked ratios
First – present their attitudes in key categories.
On following charts – view red (negative) as “barrier” to growth.
61. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor = Distribution
62. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor = Hearing Health Professional Influence
63. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Hearing Loss
64. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Knowledge Level
65. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Lifestyle
66. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Hearing Aid Performance
67. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Hearing Aid Characteristics
68. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Social Influence
69. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Stigma & Cosmetics
70. Hearing-Impaired Non-owner Attitudes Towards Hearing AidsFactor =Value of Hearing Aids
71. Top 12 Correlates of Hearing Aid Purchase Intent
72. Lowest Correlates of Hearing Aid Purchase Intent Brand
HA make only certain sounds louder
Too expensive
HA sellers take advantage of you
Can afford hearing aids
Need surgery
Know where to go for hearing tests
Know where to buy hearing aids
Old image of hearing aids
Use lower expense product
Customer orientation of dispensers
HA warranty
Knowledge of hearing aids