310 likes | 426 Views
Chapter 4: The FX Market. No single market although there are some physical locations, such as the CME, where currencies are exchanged Institutions and people, such as banks dealers physical markets facilitate the trading of currencies
E N D
Chapter 4: The FX Market • No single market although there are some physical locations, such as the CME, where currencies are exchanged • Institutions and people, such as • banks • dealers • physical markets facilitate the trading of currencies • 24 hours a day market with over $1 trillion traded each day
Growth of FX market has somewhat stalled in the most recent years • Why? • Vehicle/Key currencies: $, €, ¥, and £ • Major FX centers (by volume): London, New York, Tokyo, Singapore, Frankfurt • Ways to trade currencies: • Spot • Forward • Futures and Options
FX market is an OTC market dominated by banks • Trading done by phones and computer terminals (electronic) • Banks as market makers • Banks trade among themselves and with Speculators Arbitrageurs Other dealers and brokers Non-financial firms Central banks
Functions of FX markets 1. Transfer purchasing power from one currency to another • investments channeled to the most productive use 2. Facilitate international trade through specialized instruments • L/C, draft, B/L, etc. • see Chapter 20 3. Provide an opportunity for speculators to bet on changes • important source of liquidity
4. Provide a means to hedge against currency risk • alleviate some of the risks of international business 5. Make international portfolio diversification accessible
FX market efficiency • Allocational efficiency • Is capital channeled to the globally most productive use? • Higher among freely floating currencies • Operational efficiency • Are currency markets frictionless? • The most operationally efficient markets in the world • Informational efficiency • Are prices right? • Can anybody make extraordinary profits?
Market participants • Interbank (wholesale) vs. Client (retail) market • Bank and non-bank dealers • market makers • provide liquidity • Firms and individuals conducting commercial and investment transactions • “end users” • trade for the purpose of receiving foreign currency • Speculators and Arbitragers • trade based on their beliefs about future FX rates • trade for the purpose of profit-making • on the lookout for locational and triangular arbitrage opportunities
Central Banks and Treasuries • conduct their monetary policy through trading • often knowingly take a loss • FX Brokers • execute trades for their clients for a fee • often dealers (and even central banks) go through a broker in order to remain anonymous
Quoting system in FX trading • Banks quote a bid rate and an ask rate • Bid = rate at which the bank will buy the currency in the denominator • Memory tip: Bank Buys at Bid • Ask = rate at which the bank will sell the currency in the denominator
So: • if we want to sell the currency in the denominator, we would do that at the Bank's bid rate • if we want to buy the currency in the denominator, we would do that at the Bank's ask rate • Rule #1: • Always keep track of your currency units • Rule #2: • Always think of buying or selling the currency in the DENOMINATOR of a foreign exchange quote
Bank makes money on its bid-ask spread • bid-ask spread = ask rate - bid rate • can be computed as a % • the less traded and more volatile the currencies, the bigger the spread • because of higher risk
Direct and Indirect Quotes • direct quote: Home Currency (HC)/Foreign Currency (FC) • in U.S., direct quote is $/FC • consistent w/ Rule #2 when trading a unit of foreign currency • indirect quote: FC/HC • in U.S. then, indirect quote is FC/$ • convention in most countries • U.S. professionals traditionally use the indirect quote (e.g., DM/$) • a.k.a. European terms • Exception: British pound, Australian and NZ dollar, Irish punt
traders located in the UK traditionally use the indirect quote • i.e., a UK bank would give quotes in terms of FC/GBP
Spot rates • for "immediate" delivery • actually - 2 days for most currencies • WSJ quotes are for large transactions - $1M and above
Appreciation & Depreciation of currencies • currencies change values over time relative to one another • for instance, the U.S. $ has been depreciating relative to the Euro • $ is ”weak", € is ”strong" • with direct quotes: • if spot rate increases, the FC has appreciates relative to the $ • it now takes more $'s to "buy" one unit of FC • What does this say about the $? • What if spot rate has decreased?
How about indirect quotes? • FC/HC = FC/$ • if spot rate has gone up, what has happened to FC? • depreciated relative to the $
Forward rates • These are rates of exchange for future delivery • quoted in WSJ for 30 days, 90 days etc . . . • can be much longer - 5 to 10 years • entering into a contract to exchange currencies at a given date in the future, at the specified rate of exchange • OTC • typically through banks
there is a bid-ask spread as there was for spot rates • the longer the contract, the larger the bid-ask spread • non-standardized • no money exchanges hands until the specified contract date • Forward premium/discount • assume that we are using direct quotes: $/FC • if F (Forward rate) > S (Spot rate), the foreign currency is appreciating relative to the $ • so the forward rate contains a premium for the FC • in that case, forward $ is selling at a discount relative to the FC
Calculation of Forward premium/discount • on a Points Basis: • point = the last digit of the conventional quotation for the currency • e.g., 6 mo € in Exhibit 4.5, p. 108 is quoted Bid +112, Ask +113 • “outright” fwd quote would then be 1.0897+.0112=1.1009Bid, 1.0901+.0113=1.1014Ask • in annualized percentage terms: • (F - S)/S * 360/# days of forward contract • If this is negative (assuming direct quotes) FC selling at a forward discount
Cross Rate • The exchange rate between two currencies that is implied by their relationship to a third currency • Example: If we have spot rates of $0.1065/Mexican peso and $0.1250/Norwegian krone, what is the implied peso/krone rate?
% Changes in FX Rates • Again, easiest to keep the referent currency in the denominator (Rule #2 rules) • Simple % Change: • Annualized:
Hedging with Forwards • Forward contracts can be used to hedge currency risk • Eliminate FX-related value variation of future claims or obligations • Example: • A U.S. company can lock in the dollar value of their Account Receivable denominated in a foreign currency • Note: A forward hedge eliminates both the “upside” and the “downside”
Counter party risk in forwards: • Forward is a credit instrument • It is also a ‘zero sum game’ • The “losing” party will have an incentive to “disappear” • Forwards are mostly issued by commercial banks and used by large companies • Banks have more effective means of hedging the default risk • Large firms have ‘more to lose’ by defaulting
Futures contract on foreign currency • similar to a forward contract, a futures contract is an agreement to buy or sell: • a specified amount of foreign currency • at a specified exchange rate • on a specified date in the future
traded on an exchange (not OTC) (e.g., Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME)) • all trades through a clearing house • no bid-ask spreads • brokerage commissions • margin requirements (usually $1,000 to 2,000 per contract) • marking to market • standardized: • contract amounts • settlement dates :3rd Wednesdays in March, June, September, December • standardization increases liquidity
futures market caters to a clientele that cannot enter a forward contract • ultimate payoff from a futures contract - same as for a forward contract of the same size • closing out a position: • a position can (and often is) closed out by entering an identical contract of opposite sign • uses of futures: • hedging • speculation
Example: • Buy a SWF contract (contract size SWF 125,000) at $0.5960 • total value of the contract = DEM 125,000 x $0.5960 = $74,500 • Original margin =$2,500 • Maintenance margin = $2,000 • If the day 0 settlement price of the contract is $0.5968, the contract value is $74,600 • $100 transferred to the buyer’s margin account, which is then paid out to the buyer • On day 1, the settlement price is $0.5980, and the contract value is $74,750 • The buyer gains another $150
The price changes from $0.5968 to $0.5980 = 12 ticks • A tick is the minimum price movement in the contract • a movement of 1 tick $0.0001 would change the contract value by 125,000 x $0.0001 = $12.50 • Day 2: settlement price = $0.5969 • contract value $74,612.50 • margin account = $2,500 - 137.50 = $2,362.50 • Day 3: settlement price = $0.5929 • contract value = $74,112.50 • margin account = $2,362.50 - 500 = $1,862.50 < $2,000 • MARGIN CALL • the buyer must replenish the margin account to the original $2,500
The contract was originally bought at $0.5960 • If the investor closes it out at $0.5929, the total impact comes from a fall of 31 ticks • Net gain = -31 x $12.50 = ($387.50) • ignores round-trip commission
A comparison of currency fwd & futures contracts ForwardsFutures Location Interbank Exchange floor Maturity Negotiated 3rd week of the month Amount Negotiated Standard contract (e.g. ¥12,500,000 ) Fees Bid-ask Commissions (e.g. $30 per contract) Counterparty Bank CME Clearinghouse Collateral Negotiated Margin account Settlement At maturity Most are settled early Trading hours24 hours During exchange hours
Hedging w/ Futures • Currency forward contracts can provide a perfect hedge when the size and the timing of a foreign currency transaction are known. • Exchange-traded futures contracts come in only a few currencies, contract sizes, and maturity dates, and hence may not provide a perfect hedge against transaction exposure to foreign currency risk.