170 likes | 341 Views
Dielectron Analysis Status. WIS 21-Aug-14. Normalization. Get the normalization factors for the like sign spectra: Get in integrals of the normalized like sign spectra: Get the normalization factor for the unlike sign spectrum:. Normalization I. Normalization II. HIJING (~0-10% central).
E N D
Dielectron Analysis Status WIS 21-Aug-14
Normalization • Get the normalization factors for the like sign spectra: • Get in integrals of the normalized like sign spectra: • Get the normalization factor for the unlike sign spectrum: Normalization I. Normalization II.
HIJING (~0-10% central) • Compare the combinatorial background from SAME event with the combinatorial background from MIXED event • How do we select the combinatorial background from SAME event: vert1!=vert2 (both legs are coming from different space points) OR vert1==vert2 && vertr1==0 && vertr2==0 (both legs are coming from exactly zero – these are pi+ and pi-)
HIJING (~0-10% central) • Applying the Normalization II: -> the ratio of the combinatorics from the SAME and the MIXED is: 0.9898 +/- 0.0003
HIJING (~0-10% central) • Applying the Normalization I: -> the ratio of the combinatorics from the SAME and the MIXED is 1
HIJING to DATA -> Assuming the results from HIJING are correct we apply normalization I. to the data • Standards CA eID is applied • DC ghost track rejected • RICH ghost event rejected • Normalization done after CA and ghost cuts • HBD cuts applied later • In the following slides the data set is ~1B events
Cabana Boy settings //CabanaBoy *cb = new CabanaBoy(10,8,1,"ULMM_DataTrack"); CabanaBoy *cb = new CabanaBoy(10,8,6,"ULMM_DataTrack"); cb->setPoolType(CabanaBoy::AkibaPools);cb->setPoolDepth(100);cb->setFastMom(false);cb->setZVertexMax(20.0);//cb->setReactionPlaneSelectionType(CabanaBoy::ReactionPlaneNotUsed); cb->setReactionPlaneSelectionType(CabanaBoy::ReactionPlaneRun7RXNEllipticSN); cb->setCentralitySelectionType(CabanaBoy::CentralityTypeRun10AuAu200); • Other settings • CA eID cuts • no HBD cuts applied • Ghost events rejected
Nlike/Blike , S+- (0 < centrality < 10) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Nlike/Blike , S+- (10 < centrality < 20) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Nlike/Blike , S+- (20 < centrality < 40) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Nlike/Blike , S+- (40 < centrality < 92) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Applying strong eID cuts • eID cuts: • n0 > 3 • sqrt(emcsdphi*emcsdphi + emcsdz*emcsdz) < 2 • dep > -1 [#] • chi2/npe0 < 5 • disp < 4 • prob > 0.05 • |zed| < 75 • In the following slides the data set is ~2B events
Nlike/Blike , S+- (0 < centrality < 10) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Nlike/Blike , S+- (10 < centrality < 20) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Nlike/Blike , S+- (20 < centrality < 40) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Nlike/Blike , S+- (40 < centrality < 92) CA + ghost rej. CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching) + S/D rejection
Summary • There is some correlation in like sign? • It is masked by the combinatorics in the central, but becomes visible in the peripheral? • The like-sign ratio looks flat for the central and the normalization is reasonble? • Should we apply some kind of “jet-free region” normalization for the peripheral? • Will try to study peripheral events in HIJING