140 likes | 351 Views
DTE Hydrogen Technology Park Project. The Project Team:. Ed Chao Marshall Chase Kris Jadd Doug Glancy Advisors: Dr. Thomas P. Lyon Dow Professor of Sustainable Science, Technology, and Commerce Dr. Gregory A. Keoleian Co-Director, Center for Sustainable Systems
E N D
The Project Team: • Ed Chao • Marshall Chase • Kris Jadd • Doug Glancy Advisors: • Dr. Thomas P. Lyon • Dow Professor of Sustainable Science, Technology, and Commerce • Dr. Gregory A. Keoleian • Co-Director, Center for Sustainable Systems • Secondary Advisor: Dr. Gautam Kaul, Finance Professor
The Client: • DTE Energy’s Technology Investments unit • A diversified energy company involved in the development and management of energy-related businesses and services nationwide. • Other participants: • US Department of Energy • DaimlerChrysler • BP
What are they doing? • “Distributed Hydrogen Generation” • On-site generation of hydrogen, using electricity from the grid and solar cells to split water into hydrogen and oxygen • Use hydrogen to fuel vehicles or generate electricity using fuel cells.
One option: Fuel cell vehicles Liquid hydrogen storage tank
Why are they looking at hydrogen? • DTE wants to evaluate the feasibility of using hydrogen as an energy carrier. • Potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce dependence on foreign oil. • Can store electricity from renewable and other sources • Can be used in automobiles to replace gasoline • Determine economic viability of the distributed hydrogen generation model. • Gain experience in using hydrogen – potential competitive advantage
So where’s the problem? • Hydrogen currently isn’t a financially viable alternative to the existing energy and vehicle fueling infrastructure. • But this might change: • Many regulatory and market factors affect the viability of a hydrogen infrastructure • Price of oil • Electricity cost differentials • Regulations (RPSes, carbon regulations, etc)
Where do we fit in? • Help DTE evaluate two things: • What might future regulatory & market landscapes look like? • What are the implications of these future scenarios for the viability of DTE’s distributed hydrogen generation model? • Ultimate goals: • Decide whether this distribution system has a chance of succeeding in the energy market. • Provide DTE with the tools to conduct ongoing evaluations as circumstances change.
How? • Literature review • Interview energy & policy researchers and professionals • Define market, policy and other variables likely to affect distributed hydrogen generation • Develop set of likely scenarios based on above variables • Design software input-output model using the above variables and scenarios to evaluate the financial and competitive viability and environmental impacts of DTE’s proposed stations.
Methodology • Phase I: Project inception – May 30 • Initial review of existing models in the field • Literature review • Initial client interviews • Site Visit • Phase II: June 1-September 1 • Continue interviews and lit. review • begin drafting model units and scenarios • Deliverable: Initial model units and scenarios for presentation to advisors and client • Phase III: September 1-December 20 • Continue drafting model units and fleshing out scenarios • Plug scenario variables into models, gather output • Draft recommendations based on scenarios and model output • Deliverables: Scenarios, models, and draft recommendations to advisors and client • Phase IV: January 2-April 15 • Draft reports submitted to advisors and client • Revisions as needed • Final reports and presentations to client and school • Training of DTE representatives to use models
Project Roles: • Primary client contact: Ed Chao • Primary advisor contact: Marshall • Team Finances: Kris • Information controller: Marshall • Team coordinator & meeting planner: Ed • Team social chair: Kris
Travel to project site, other DTE facilities, and interview and research sites Travel to one conference for presentation of results Telephone calls for interviews & discussions Data and reference material Relevant modeling software purchase and training Opus binding, 7 copies @ $150/copy Administrative overhead (photocopying, etc) Total $500 $1200 $150 $1500 $3000 $1050 $500 $7900 Budget
Results/Deliverables • Distributed hydrogen energy station evaluation software-based model. • Explanation of scenario forecasts, and discussion of conclusions and recommendations based on those scenarios. • Presentation of the model, scenarios used, and recommendations to DTE representatives. • Presentation and bound paper to fulfill the SNRE Master’s Project academic requirement.