1 / 7

AusAID Bilateral Donor System

AusAID Bilateral Donor System. Country Program Evaluations included in Performance Management and Evaluation Policy (PMEP) of the Agency Part of Tier 2 of Agency Results Framework Three identified components to ‘purpose’ – management, learning and accountability

truly
Download Presentation

AusAID Bilateral Donor System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AusAID Bilateral Donor System • Country Program Evaluations included in Performance Management and Evaluation Policy (PMEP) of the Agency • Part of Tier 2 of Agency Results Framework • Three identified components to ‘purpose’ – management, learning and accountability • Builds on and tests self assessed Annual Program Performance Reports (APPR)

  2. AusAID CPE Methodology Evaluates three elements of the strategic architecture – • Country Situation Analysis – analysis and policies to inform the ODA approach • Country Strategy – a public statement of the ODA approach • Delivery Strategies – how AusAID will deliver aid in each sector or priority area

  3. AusAID CPE Methodology Evaluative Criteria – • Selectivity and focus – has a clear and informed allocation rationale • Represent whole-of-government interests – means the interests of various Australian Government departments delivering ODA • Effectively managed – is strategic in nature, takes risks into due consideration and deploys resources efficiently • Produce results – refers to the outputs, outcomes and impacts (intended or unintended) of the cooperation program

  4. Methodological Challenges • Explicit versus implicit – strategy acknowledged as only a small part of what the program does • Operational approach entails much wider scale of ways of working – understanding the link between the two is difficult • Avoiding retrospective strategies – does the strategy drive the program or the program drive the strategy? • Enough structure while not restricting innovation in approach

  5. Choosing CPEs Office for Development Effectiveness (ODE) responsible for CPEs • Work plan decided by Independent Evaluation Committee (3 outside members 1 internal) • Largely driven by current internal performance and policy priorities – Health Checks prepared by Operations to inform choices (set of broad-based program metrics) • Very few CPEs in last 5 years – huge political opposition internally and little clarity without significant work on strategies themselves • No mandatory requirement, but have returned to favor given political pressures on spend

More Related