160 likes | 346 Views
Right place? Right time? Right person? Cultural heritage experts working with the military. Peter Stone UK National Commission for UNESCO & Newcastle University AIA 2011. Overview. Much blindingly obvious Based on my activity since 2003 Trilogy:
E N D
Right place? Right time? Right person? Cultural heritage experts working with the military. Peter Stone UK National Commission for UNESCO & Newcastle University AIA 2011
Overview • Much blindingly obvious • Based on my activity since 2003 • Trilogy: • Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq (2008) • Archaeology, Cultural Property, and the Military (2010) • Cultural Heritage, Ethics, and the Military (2011) • Cannot rely on recreation of Monuments Men model • Much still to do
Right place • To have influence cultural heritage experts must be either ‘on the inside’ or ‘accepted by the inside’ • Failed in 2003 because no cultural heritage experts had anything like the necessary level of influence • Requires acceptance by politicians and military that CPP is important • Winning the minds of military…slowly • Long way to go with politicians
Significant activity since 2003 • NATO’s ‘Comprehensive Approach’ & US revision of military doctrine • CENTCOM Historical Cultural Action Group • USA National Committee for Blue Shield • USA ratification of 1954 Hague Convention • ANCBS • SAFE • WATCH • CHAMP • IMCURWG • ICCROMM & ICOMOS activity • Strategic plan for DoD CPP training • Numerous conferences and courses • Publications
A concern Are we spreading ourselves too thinly..? Reinventing the wheel too much..? Are we properly focussed?
Right time Four phases of necessary activity: • Long-term awareness training at all levels • Specific pre-deployment training regarding host country/region • During conflict • Post conflict
1 - Long-term awareness training at all levels • Delivered at different intensity for different levels of military • Generic value of cultural property & cultural heritage • Cultural [national pride; dignity; use of heritage] • Economic [healthy society; tourism] • Military • Trade in illicit antiquities • Historical examples [Nazi Germany; Zimbabwe; India; Iraq; & Former Yugoslavia] • Generic training scenarios as already delivered
1 - Long-term awareness training at all levels: right person • Civilian cultural heritage experts embedded within the military • National cultural heritage experts • CIMIC/Civil Affairs staff
2 - Specific pre-deployment training & activity regarding host country/region • Identification of specific sites; museums; libraries; archives; galleries • Potential specific issues regarding CPP in-theatre • Types of artefacts • Quality of host country’s cultural heritage sector • Specific requirements for protection of CP – is specific expertise likely to be needed? • Marking of CP on maps • Allocation of unit responsibilities re CPP • [Protection of CP]
2 - Specific pre-deployment training regarding host country/region: right person • National/International cultural heritage experts • If appropriate, host country experts • CIMIC/Civil Affairs staff • Civilian cultural heritage experts embedded within the military • [Host country experts]
3 - During conflict • Damage limitation • Liaison with military legal advisors • ‘Conscience’ role • If possible/appropriate, communication between military and host country experts • Stifling trade in illicit antiquities
3 - During conflict: right person • CIMIC/Civil Affairs staff • Host country experts if possible • Arms length: • NGOs • International experts
4 - Post conflict • Stabilisation • Emergency aid/repair/conservation • Facilitation of access to, and liaison between, experts • Provision of necessary materials & technology • Combating trade in illicit antiquities
4 - Post conflict: right person • Host country cultural heritage experts • NGOs – Blue Shield (& ICRC/C?) • CIMIC/Civil Affairs staff • International cultural heritage experts
Issues • Naïve aspiration for Utopia • Not going to happen overnight • No time for additional training • Weakness of Blue Shield • Use of private security companies • Need to develop ‘networks of the willing’ • Need to win understanding of politicians – major issue in UK
Observation But if we don’t do it… nobody will…