1 / 54

International Accounting Standards Committee Issues Under IAS 39 AAA August 2000

International Accounting Standards Committee Issues Under IAS 39 AAA August 2000. Presentation by Paul Pacter Hong Kong paupacter@deloitte.com.hk.

Download Presentation

International Accounting Standards Committee Issues Under IAS 39 AAA August 2000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. International Accounting Standards CommitteeIssues Under IAS 39AAA August 2000

  2. Presentation by Paul PacterHong Kong paupacter@deloitte.com.hk

  3. IAS 39: SCOPE• All enterprises• All financial instruments except:-- Investments in subs, associates, joint ventures-- Leases, pensions, insurance-- Enterprise’s own equity-- Commodity contracts - intent to take delivery

  4. IAS 39: RECOGNITION• All financial assets and liabilities must be on the balance sheet• Including all derivatives

  5. TRADE DATE OR SETTLEMENT DATE?Purchases: Normal purchases either at trade or settlement date, with recognition of certain value changes if settlement date accounting is used.Sales: Settlement date.

  6. INITIAL MEASUREMENT: FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES• Initially all financial instruments measured at cost (which is fair value at acquisition)• Transaction cost included in initial measurement.

  7. SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT: FINANCIAL ASSETS All financial assets are remeasured to fair value (includes those held for trading or available for sale) except the following, which are measured at amortised cost . . .

  8. SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT AT COST• Originated loans and receivables• Fixed maturity investments: must intend and be able to hold to maturity • Some unquoted equities and derivatives indexed to them (if FV is not measurable reliably)

  9. STRICT TESTS FOR HELD TO MATURITY• Single sale taints all for two years -- unless sale is due to isolated event beyond company’s control and not reasonably anticipated• Variable rate debt can be HTMNote: Intent and ability tests do not apply to originated loans

  10. SUBSEQUENT MEASUREMENT: FINANCIAL LIABILITIES• Most financial liabilities at original recorded amount less principal repayments and amortisation• Derivatives and liabilities held for trading (short sales) remeasured to fair value

  11. REPORTING FV CHANGE:Single enterprise-wide option:• Entire FV change in P&L OR• In P&L only FV changes relating to trading assets and liabilities. FV changes for non-trading assets in equity until sold, then in P&L. Derivatives always trading (unless hedging)

  12. IMPAIRMENT OF FINANCIAL ASSETS CARRIED AT COST• Recognise impairment lossesIndividually for large assets• Portfolio allowed for groups• Strict indicators of impairment• Write-down to P&L• Reversal to P&L up to cost• Interest after impairment

  13. MEASURING IMPAIRMENTImpairment is the excess of carrying amount over estimated recoverable amount (present value of cash flows discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate).

  14. DERECOGNITIONAssets: Control surrendered -- transferee can sell or pledge the asset. Transferor can only reacquire at fair value.Liabilities: Debtor must be legally released. No in-substance defeasance.Partial transfer: Split based on relative FV.

  15. COLLATERALIf a debtor gives collateral to the creditor, and the creditor can sell or repledge:• Debtor recognises the collateral given as a receivable• Creditor recognises the collateral received as an asset and the obligation to repay the collateral as a liability.

  16. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES• Not normally recognised under IAS 39 (eg letter of credit)• Recognised in some derecognitions• If recognised, measure at fair value until expiration

  17. HEDGE ACCOUNTINGDesignating a financial instrument as an offset to the change in FV or cash flows of an asset, liability, commitment, or forecasted transaction.Offsetting effects recognised in P&L in the same period.

  18. HEDGE ACCOUNTINGPermitted by IAS 39 in certain circumstances. The hedging relationship must be:• Clearly designated• Measurable• Actually effective

  19. FAIR VALUE HEDGE• Hedge value change in a recognised asset or liability• Gain or loss on hedging instrument and on hedged item are both recognised in P&L • Carrying amount of hedged item is adjusted even if otherwise carried at cost

  20. CASH FLOW HEDGE• Hedge cash flow risk from an asset or liability, firm commitment, or forecasted transaction• Gain or loss on hedging instrument in equity until the hedged transaction hits P&L, then “recycled” to P&L

  21. DISCONTINUE HEDGE ACCOUNTING WHEN• Hedging instrument expires (unless replaced or rolled over)• Hedge is no longer effective• The forecasted transaction (if any) is no longer expected to occur

  22. BASIS ADJUSTMENT• When the forecasted transaction occurs, should the amount reported in equity become part of the cost of the asset or liability?• IAS 39: Yes.

  23. DISCLOSURE - 1• Most IAS 32 disclosures continue• How FV was determined• FV changes in P&L or equity?• Current period amounts in P&L or equity• Cumulative amounts in equity

  24. DISCLOSURE - 2• Describe risk management policies• Detailed Info if FV cannot be reliably measured• Detailed info about hedges• Reclassifications of financial• instruments (e.g. HTM to AFS)• Impairment and reversals

  25. EFFECTIVE DATE• 1 January 2001• Companies are gearing up now• Postponement probability: nil

  26. TRANSITION• Recognise all financial assets and liabilities, including those that had not previously been recognised• If a previously designated hedge does not meet IAS 39 conditions, no more hedge accounting

  27. MAINTENANCE OF IAS 39• Minor amendments to IAS 39: proposed in June• Implementation Guidance Q&A: Special Implementation Guidance Committee is hard at work. Over 100 Q&A exposed.

  28. E66 JUNE 2000Minor Amendments to IAS 39• Symmetry of trade or settlement date for both purchases and sales.• Lender will no longer recognise collateral received from a borrower. Disclose. • Assess impairment individually for large assets.

  29. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE• Being developed by IASC staff• Reviewed by Implementation Guidance Committee (IGC)• Exposed for public comment• Reviewed and approved by IGC

  30. IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCEProposed Guidance:• Batch 1, 8 May 2000: 75 Q&A• Batch 2,12 May 2000: 33 Q&A• Batch 3 dealing with bank issues under development• Goal: finish by October• Status: Best practice guidance

  31. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• Are credit rating guarantee contracts excluded? No.• Are credit default derivatives excluded? Yes.• Is gold bullion a financial asset? No.• Are offsetting loans, one fixed one variable, a derivative? Yes.

  32. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• Company sells a put on its own shares, and has right to settle in shares. Liability or equity? Eq.• What if holder of put has right to require cash settlement? Liab.• Are royalties based on volume of revenue a derivative? No.• Contract to convert currency at fixed rate -- derivative? Yes.

  33. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• Is fixed price forward contract to purchase a commodity a derivative? Depends on intent. • Is 5-year put option to sell building for fixed price a derivative? Depends on history. • Are bank loan commitments derivatives? Yes, but not treated if ‘regular way’ draw-down.

  34. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• If embedded is separated from host, show separately on balance sheet? Yes. • Can investment in convertible bond be HTM? No. • Transferor has right of first refusal. Derecognise? Yes. • HTM not tainted by sale ‘close to maturity’. What is close? Under 3 months.

  35. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• HTM not tainted by sale after collecting ‘substantially all’ principal. Substantially = 90%. • Does reclass from HTM to trading taint all HTM? Yes. • Is amortisation of premium or discount interest (P&L) or part of FV change (equity)? Interest.

  36. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• Can impairment of individual loan or HTM asset be ‘ignored’ by a portfolio approach? No. • Can partial term hedging get hedge accounting? Yes. • Do bank ‘internal hedges’ get hedge accounting? Only if risk ultimately laid off with 3rd party.

  37. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• Can hedge effectiveness be assessed on after-tax basis? Yes. • If hedge is considered highly (but not 100%) effective, does ineffective portion go to equity? No, P&L. • Is purchase of bond when issued an originated loan? Yes.

  38. SAMPLE GUIDANCE ISSUES• Is commitment to issue debt at fixed rate accounted for as a derivative? No. • Derecognise receivables “sold” with guarantee for all credit losses? Yes. • Amortise discount or premium on variable rate investment to next repricing date or maturity? Depends on intent to hold.

  39. JOINT WORKING GROUP ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS• IASC and 10 standard setters• Exploring full fair value model• Developing proposal by end of 2000• Each standard-setter will invite comments on JWG discussion paper

  40. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS• Applies to all enterprises• Scope similar to IAS 39, but:-- Includes financial guarantee contracts-- Includes weather derivatives-- Applies to acquired servicing assets and liabilities-- Applies to any obligation that either party can settle in cash

  41. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS• Recognition of financial instruments: similar to IAS 39• Embedded derivative provisions are similar to IAS 39 except will be fewer separations because more hybrids are measured at fair value

  42. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS Derecognition: when enterprise is no longer a party to the contractual rights or obligations (“transferor has no continuing interest”)

  43. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS • Would derecognise in most repo and securities lending transactions.• Note: Transferee must have substance in its own right or transferred asset is isolated in bankruptcy.

  44. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS• Measure all financial instruments at fair value when recognised initially.• Remeasure to fair value at each reporting date.

  45. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONSFair value is exit price based on market transactionsBest: observed market priceIf exchange traded, closing price minus commissionsIf dealer traded, bid prices for assets, asked prices for liabilities

  46. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONSBest: market price for identical instrument.• If not available, use price for similar instrument.• If more than one market, use most advantageous price.

  47. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS• If no market price for identical or similar, use a DPV cash flow model based on general market info (interest rates, FX rates, commodity prices) risk-adjusted as necessary. • If not able to make reliable FV estimate currently, use most recent FV estimate.

  48. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS• Ignore non-contractual aspects of financial instruments (such as future deposits by depositors or additional purchases by credit card holders). • But do consider behavioural expectations (eg prepayments).

  49. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONSIf financial instrument is denominated in foreign currency:• For forward contract use forward rate• For all others use spot rate

  50. KEY TENTATIVE JWG CONCLUSIONS• Do not adjust market price for size of holding.• Procedures for determining fair value must be documented. • Fair values are generally determinable, at reasonable cost, and are practicably implementable.

More Related