1 / 32

SEEKING THE DRAGON PEARL… MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN? WRONG TARGET

SEEKING THE DRAGON PEARL… MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN? WRONG TARGET. Milton Cohen FPMANZCA ASM, Hong Kong , May 2011. The “implementation gap” How do we use the information we have? We don’t use the evidence we have. Dr Steve Yentis , Ellis Gillespie Lecture, 14 May 2011. Low back pain

tudor
Download Presentation

SEEKING THE DRAGON PEARL… MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN? WRONG TARGET

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SEEKING THE DRAGON PEARL…MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN?WRONG TARGET Milton Cohen FPMANZCA ASM, Hong Kong, May 2011

  2. The “implementation gap” How do we use the information we have? We don’t use the evidence we have. Dr Steve Yentis, Ellis Gillespie Lecture, 14 May 2011

  3. Low back pain Musculoskeletal pain Neuropathic pain “Myofascial” pain “Fibromyalgia” Facet joint “arthritis” Internal disc disruption “Sciatica” “Neuralgia” PSEUDODIAGNOSES

  4. Biomedical focus Anatomical determinism Confused and confusing nomenclature The dominant paradigm…

  5. Biomedical focus >> “Biopsychosocial” Anatomical determinism >> Functional appeciation Confused nomenclature >> Rational understanding …that has reached its use-by date

  6. ENVIRONMENT PERSON BRAIN AND NERVOUS SYSTEM BODY

  7. ENVIRONMENT -social PERSON -psycho- BRAIN AND NERVOUS SYSTEM Bio- BODY

  8. THREE ARGUMENTS • From neurobiology • From therapeutics • From terminology

  9. CENTRAL SENSITISATION • “…once triggered remained autonomous for some time, or only required a very low level of nociceptor input to maintain it.” • “Pain…might not necessarily reflect the presence of a peripheral noxious stimulus.” • “Pain could…become the equivalent of an illusory perception…” Woolf C. Pain 2011;152:S2-S15

  10. Yunus MB. Semin Arth Rheum 2007; 36:339-356

  11. Diagnostic criteria Avoid chasing nociception in region of pain Nociception vs perception Words! What are we doing with drugs? CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF CENTRAL SENSITISATION OF NOCICEPTION

  12. Anterior cingulate cortical (ACC) activation • Thermal injury (Koyama et al 2003) • Rectal distention (Wilder-Smith et al 2004) • Hearing pain words (Osaka et al 2004) • Viewing facial expressions of pain (Botvinick et al 2005) • Social exclusion (Eisenberger et al 2003)

  13. A model regarding brain circuitry involved in the transition from acute to chronic pain. Apkarian et al. Pain 2011:152:S49-S64

  14. BRAIN AND NERVOUS SYSTEM HYPERVIGILANCE HYPERALGESIA BODY

  15. BRAIN AND NERVOUS SYSTEM CONTEXTUAL EFFECT HYPERVIGILANCE HYPERALGESIA MAINTAINING SENSITISATION BODY

  16. THREE ARGUMENTS • From neurobiology • From therapeutics • From terminology

  17. A review of reviews Ernst et al. Pain 2011;152:755-764 “It is becoming increasingly clear that the surrounding ritual, the beliefs of patient and practitioner and the nonspecific effects of treatment are likely responsible for any reported benefits.” Hall, H. Commentary. Pain 2011;152:711-712 ACUPUNCTURE

  18. Variability of criteria used to diagnose myofascial trigger point pain syndrome - Evidence from a review of the literature. Tough EA et al, Clin J Pain 2007;23:278-286 Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Lucas N et al. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 80-9. MYOFASCIAL PAIN (SYNDROME)Is it credible?

  19. Systematic review of needling as a treatment for myofascial trigger point pain Cummings TM, White AR. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:986-92 The effectiveness of non-invasive treatments for active myofascial trigger point pain: a systematic review of the literature. Rickards LD. Int J Osteopath Med 2006; 9:120-136 “Know that the best evidence for the treatment of myofascial pain is extremely limited.”IASP Curriculum

  20. Shoulder pain “There is some evidence from methodologically weak trials to indicate that some physiotherapy interventions are effective for some specific shoulder disorders.” (Green et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004258) Low back pain “In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: acupuncture, analgesics, antidepressants, back schools, behavioural therapy, electromyographic biofeedback, exercise, injections (epidural corticosteroid injections, facet joint injections, local injections), intensive multidisciplinary treatment programmes, lumbar supports, massage, muscle relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), non-surgical interventional therapies (intradiscal electrothermal therapy, radiofrequency denervation), spinal manipulative therapy, surgery, traction, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation(TENS).” (Chou R. Clinical Evidence [Clin Evid (Online)] 2010 Oct 08) “More studies are needed…”

  21. “…the positive studies are false positives…” “No matter how many studies showed negative results, they would not persuade true believers to give up their beliefs.” Hall, H. Commentary. Pain 2011;152:711-712. “More studies [may not be] the answer…” How do we use the information we have? We don’t use the evidence we have.

  22. Chronic “musculoskeletal” pain is attributable to altered central nociceptive and/or perceptual function rather than reflecting active peripheral pathology CONCEPTUAL SHIFT

  23. THREE ARGUMENTS • From neurobiology • From therapeutics • From terminology 

  24. “Pain” unacceptable as a diagnosis Biomedical matrix dominant anatomical determinism pseudo-mechanistic dichotomy Where are the “-psycho-” and “-social” components CLINICAL NOMENCLATURE

  25. A FALSE DICHOTOMY “NOCICEPTIVE” “NEUROPATHIC”

  26. REPLACING THE DICHOTOMY “NOCICEPTIVE” “NOCIPLASTIC” “NEUROPATHIC”

  27. [type] [site of pain] OR [hypothesis of pathogenesis] [site of clinical pain] A MATRIX FOR THE “BIO-” CONTRIBUTION

  28. [knee] [arthritis] [inflammatory] [knee impairment] KNEE PAIN knee “osteoarthritis” = symptomatic osteoarthrosis of the knee = biomechanical impairment of the knee on the [sufficient but not necessary] basis of osteoathrosis [biomechanical] [knee impairment]

  29. (chronic) [low back] [pain] ?nociceptive ?neuropathic [nociplastic] [lumbar spine impairment] leg pain in segmental distribution + signs of radiculopathy lumbar radiculopathy [radiculopathic] [leg impairment] leg pain in non-segmental distribution with no signs of neurological deficit somatic referred pain in leg [nociplastic] [leg impairment] SPINAL ± REFERRED PAIN

  30. Complex regional “pain syndrome” of arm ? inflammatory ?neuropathic [nociplastic] [upper limb impairment] “Fibromyalgia” or “myofascial pain” (“syndrome”) ? nociceptive neuropathic [diffuse] or [local] [nociplastic] [impairment] “CRPS” and “FIBROMYALGIA”

  31. THREE ARGUMENTS • From neurobiology • From therapeutics • From terminology 

  32. “Target” is CNS and its person Transcending face validity of biomedical approach (“old paradigm”) New nomenclature required The “dragon pearl” for “musculoskeletal” pain ?

More Related