1 / 25

Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation

Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation. CHIP Learning Session # 2 • March 11 ,2014 Sarah Hartsig, M.S. Kansas Health Institute. PHAB Requirements. 5.2.2: CHIP Includes measureable and time-framed targets 5.2.3: Implementation Implement the CHIP in partnership with others

tuwa
Download Presentation

Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation CHIP Learning Session # 2 • March 11 ,2014 Sarah Hartsig, M.S. Kansas Health Institute

  2. PHAB Requirements • 5.2.2: CHIP • Includes measureable and time-framed targets • 5.2.3: Implementation • Implement the CHIP in partnership with others • Tracking process to document progress in implementation (action plan) • 5.2.4: Monitoring • Monitor and revise as needed the strategies in the CHIP with participation from stakeholders and partners

  3. Crosswalk: Implementation

  4. Crosswalk: Monitoring and Evaluation

  5. Implementation: Where the ‘rubber hits the road’ • Strong CHIP and action steps are a prerequisite for successful implementation • But they DON’T guarantee success • Must maintain active engagement with partners • Keeping momentum can be aided by strong communication

  6. Monitoring • Tracking progress of your outcome measures and process measures/activities • Need to determine: • Data Source • Responsible organization/individual • Monitoring frequency

  7. Monitoring (continued) • Frequency is determined by • Sensitivity of measure (i.e. obesity rate vs. attendance at farmers’ market) • Time/resources • Availability of data (some statewide and national measures are only updated yearly) • Monitoring more frequently can allow responsiveness in strategies, if needed • Allows for adaptation to challenges • Remember to document!

  8. Full Detailed Plan Example

  9. What if we’re not on track? • PHAB anticipates that you may need to change course • That is OKAY! • Document what you did and why • Include in monitoring and evaluation plan

  10. Worksheet #9

  11. Worksheet #9: Example

  12. Practice • Use Worksheet #9 • Develop a Monitoring/Evaluation plan • Fill out the first 6 columns • Take a look at your Outcome Measure(s) • Where will you get the data? • How frequently will you monitor it? • Who will be responsible?

  13. Monitoring and…Evaluation • Identify and understand the results of the program • Helps to form the decision about whether your activities produced the change you set out to make Remember this?

  14. Evaluation: Types • Impact/outcome evaluation • Review outcomes measures • “Did the community’s health change in the way we set out to change it?” • Process evaluation • Review completion of process measures/action steps • “Did we do what we said we were going to do?”

  15. Developing vs. Evaluating What will help us meet our…? Were we successful? Did it help mae progress toward our…? Impact/Outcome Process

  16. Why Evaluate? Remember: Activities Outcomes Impact What do your stakeholders care about? And what really matters at the end of the day? How will you know when you have made a difference? Evaluation is about telling and learning from your story.

  17. Evaluating for Success: Example Goal: Increase the consumption of healthy foods by County residents • Activities: Craft a healthy vending policy for schools • Outcomes: • 22% of youth ages 2-17 consume 5 or more servings of fruit and vegetables daily • Increase sales of healthy foods in vending machines from 10% to 30% • Impact: By 2020, obesity in County is under 28% (baseline: 32% in 2012)

  18. More on Evaluation • For our purposes, evaluation is the end-result of your outcomes measures (and activities/process measures) • However, evaluations can include many parts: • Contextual narrative • Focus groups • Surveys • Advanced Statistical Analysis • External evaluation of program and related activities • Financial assessment • If you are receiving a grant, your funder may require a more extensive evaluation than a list of outcome measures

  19. Tools and Resources • http://kansashealth.org/grantmaking/evaluation/resources

  20. Worksheet #9

  21. Worksheet #9: Example

  22. Discussion • Use Worksheet #9 • Review your Monitoring/Evaluation plan • Discuss: What will you do when you’re not on track to reach the goal?

  23. Questions? Sarah Hartsig, M.S. Analyst, Kansas Health Institute shartsig@khi.org 785-233-5443

  24. Resources • NACCHO CHA-CHIP resources • http://www.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/CHAIP/upload/Final-Planning-for-CHIP-Monitoring-and-Evaluation-Participants-Slides.pdf • http://www.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/CHAIP/upload/Unlocking-the-Secrets-of-CHIP-Implementation-Final-Slides.pdf • KU Community Toolbox: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluation/framework-for-evaluation/main

  25. Kansas Health Institute Information for policy makers. Health for Kansans.

More Related