1 / 34

Presentation on Full Scale CRA and Developing RRAP

Presentation on Full Scale CRA and Developing RRAP. Experiential learning. Ownership Mainstreaming Exclusion issues Relief mentality/politics everywhere No review process exists No stocktaking / individual organization’s target Undermining coping capacity /Making Community dependent

tyanne
Download Presentation

Presentation on Full Scale CRA and Developing RRAP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation on Full Scale CRA and Developing RRAP

  2. Experiential learning • Ownership • Mainstreaming • Exclusion issues • Relief mentality/politics everywhere • No review process exists • No stocktaking / individual organization’s target • Undermining coping capacity /Making Community dependent • Requisite Competency

  3. Dos & Don’ts • Use UDMC members; particularly the Chair as facilitator (Describing different steps of CRA/ benefit of CRA, Roles of CRA Facilitators), • Create opportunity for the DMC members to be a part of facilitators team, do not treat them as secondary stakeholders only, • Do not try to give impression that only the non-government organizations’ have expertise to do CRA, • Do not engage junior level / entry level staff to deal with DDMC and or UzDMC, • Take every steps to mainstream the RRAP into development plan • Be tactful not to show over enthusiasm,

  4. Five Stages of Community Risk Assessment

  5. Five Stages Community Risk Assessment

  6. What do we mean by Community? • Community is a group of people having ethnic or cultural or religious characteristics in common with common interest living in a particular area.

  7. What do we mean by “Hazard” • Hazard:is an event that could lead to danger, loss or injury

  8. What is Risk? • Risk is the probability of harmful consequences or expected losses (deaths, injuries, property, livelihoods, economic activity disrupted or environment damaged) resulting from interactions between natural or human-induced hazards and vulnerable conditions. • Risk = Hazards X Vulnerability/Capacity Gap

  9. What is Assessment ? Assessment is an evaluation or appraisal of a condition

  10. Assessment could be done in many ways: • Secondary Data Review • Consultation with the decision makers / duty bearers. • Consultation with the people at risk and decision makers / duty bearers.

  11. What is CRA? CRA is a participatory process for assessing:- • Hazards, • Vulnerabilities, • Risks, • Ability to cope, • Preparing coping strategies and • Finally preparing a risk reduction action plan by the local community.

  12. STEPS IN CRA • CRA has two parts: • Pre CRA • CRA

  13. Pre-CRA Steps(Planning Meeting with UzDMC) • Consensus Building at Upazila level • Which are the vulnerable Union(s) in terms of Hazard (s)? • Is there any Risk Assessment done? • If it is done-when done and name of the organization. • Is there any further revision needed? • Method: Plenary session; Participants: UzDMC Members NOTE: If new CRA needed then the next steps are applicable

  14. Planning Meeting with UDMC • Consensus Building at UDMC level • Vulnerable pockets/parts of the Union(s). • Consensus on the CRA schedule & Steps/sessions. • Logistics support needed by the CRA facilitators etc.

  15. Relevant information Collection • Scientific & Modeling Information • Socio-economic Information [From Secondary Sources]

  16. Example of Scientific and modeling information • Rainfall Trends over the seasons for last years • River Bank Erosion Trend and Prediction • Land Elevation • Groundwater table and quality of water information (including discharge and recharge rate) • Water level/water extent /duration of last floods • Drought trend and Prediction information • Cyclonic surge predictions/ or past inundation

  17. Example of Socio-economic information • Location, Type and Area • Population • Education (primary, secondary) • Health and Family Planning • Communication (roads, bridge, culverts, sluice gates etc) • River, Canal, Wetland (beels) etc. • Economic Activities (livelihood options) • Social – Religious Groups

  18. STEPS IN PRE-CRA (Contd); • Familiarize facilitators with the people’s vulnerability and local risk environment. • Methods/Tools: Transect Walk, Social cum vulnerability Mapping, Key Informants Interview-KII. • Stakeholders: UDMC Members, Village People, Govt. & NGO officials

  19. Documentation • Narrative report on Transact walk • Narrative report on KII

  20. Getting ready for CRA • CRA participants selection • Reconfirmation of Date and Venue • Notification to the selected participants • Logistics arrangements/ supplies • Briefing to CRA facilitators by the respective organization. • Method: Discussion with UDMC

  21. Consolidated Table for Exercise

  22. STEPS IN CRA • Identification & prioritization of Hazards and Problems faced due to Hazards. • Methods/tools: Group Work. • Stakeholders: Vulnerable Community (Women, Landless, Farmers, Fisher Folk, PwDs), UDMC, Village people. • (Men & Women Separate group)

  23. Identification of Reasons Behind the Problems • NOTE: Prioritization of identified reasons (vulnerabilities) • Method: Group Work • Stakeholders: Vulnerable Community (Women, Landless, Farmers, Fisher Folk, PwDs), UDMC, Village people. • (Men & Women Separate group)

  24. Identification of Risks • Risks statement: If the reasons are not addressed what risks likely to occur: NOTE: Prioritization of Risks Method: Group Work Stakeholders: Vulnerable Community (Women, Landless, Farmers, Fisher Folk, PwDs), UDMC, Village people. (Men & Women Separate group)

  25. Identification of RR Options NOTE: Prioritization of RR Options • Method: Group Work • Stakeholders: Vulnerable Community (Women, Landless, Farmers, Fisher Folk, PwDs), UDMC, Village people. • (Men & Women Separate group)

  26. Compilation of RR Options • The facilitators will compile and prepare a common list of prioritized RR Options including the special options identified by Female participants • Method: Room Discussion • Stakeholders: 4-5 representative from Each group

  27. RR Action Plan-RRAP • Community Level MY-RRAP Method: Group Work • Stakeholders: Vulnerable Community (Women, Landless, Farmers, Fisher Folk, PwDs), UDMC, Village people-Combined Group

  28. Refer to Upazila DMC A list of the RR options are to be prepared for UzDMC’s assistance • Method: Group Work • Stakeholders: Vulnerable Community (Women, Landless, Farmers, Fisher Folk, PwDs), UDMC, Village people-Combined Group

  29. Validation at UDMC Level • Presentation of the findings from Transact walk up to proposed RRAP at Community level: • Method: Plenary Session • Stakeholders: UDMC leaders including members, local elites, and representatives from primary stakeholders (Both men & women)

  30. Comprehensive RRAP at UzDMC Based on the forwarded list of RR Options a comprehensive RRAP would be prepared: • Method: Group work • Stakeholder: UzDMC members

  31. Validation Session • Validation of the Upazila based Comprehensive RRAP • Method: Plenary Session • Stakeholders: UzDMC Leaders including general members • NOTE: Referral may happen at this stage too-Refer to DDMC

  32. Impact Analysis of Risk Reduction Options • Political / Social • Technical / Financial • CCA/Environmental and • Sustainability

  33. CONCLUSION • The end product is a consensual community risk assessment and set of risk reduction actions: It includes: • Prevention/ Mitigation Measures • Preparedness Measures

  34. Thanks

More Related