180 likes | 301 Views
EMCal Jet Trigger Status. Hans Muller/CERN Peter Jacobs/LBNL. Jet Trigger enhancement. Jet trigger. Compare central Pb+Pb to reference measurements Pb+Pb peripheral: vary system size and shape p+A: cold nuclear matter effects p+p (14 TeV): no nuclear effects, but different energy
E N D
EMCal Jet Trigger Status Hans Muller/CERN Peter Jacobs/LBNL
Jet Trigger enhancement Jet trigger • Compare central Pb+Pb to reference measurements • Pb+Pb peripheral: vary system size and shape • p+A: cold nuclear matter effects • p+p (14 TeV): no nuclear effects, but different energy • p+p (5.5 TeV): ideal reference, but limited statistics All reference systems are required for a complete systematic study Includes acceptance, efficiency, dead time, energy resolution
Jet trigger in p+p Trigger efficiency Jet Patch 0.25x0.25 Jet energy (GeV) • p+p in ALICE: L~ 5x1030/cm2/s ~ 200 kHz • ALICE DAQ limits recording to 200 Hz • L1 rejection ~2000-4000 for p+p Chris Anson Sharp threshold at required L1 rejection
Jet yields: one LHC year Jet yield in 20 GeV bin Large gains due to jet trigger Large variation in statistical reach for different reference systems
Jet quenching measurement:p+Pb reference • With EMCal: jet trigger+ improved jet reconstruction provides • much greater ET reach • systematically improved response
Jet quenching measurement:Peripheral Pb+Pb reference Without EMCal, significant quenching measurements beyond ~100 GeV are not possible
PHOS / EMCal readout and trigger Charge-Sensitive-Preamplifier ( CSP ) Shaper CERN/Wuhan Altro-chips (10 bit ADC) TPC-like readout backend DAQ and Trigger DATE Monitoring 1 ò I dt = gauss V semi sampling EMcal 10…20 MHz PHOS 2 .. 10 MHz 2 digitization ranges - - HLT step C PHOS t =15 ns r GDC t EMCal tpeak= 200ns RC discharge =100us EMCal L0 L2 DDL (data) PHOS tpeak= 2000ns R p 1V/pC A.) RC highpass B.) dual integrator 100 us GTL LTC V0 A A = 0.015 -15 GeV = 0.005 -5 GeV A1 1 1 ADC PHS-Shaper fc =1.6 kHz A A = 0.25..-250 GeV = 0.08..-80 GeV MEB pipeline TTC (L2) 2 2 C EC-Shaper fc =1.6 MHz GTL Readout Bus f 20dB 2 * 20db 10b High gain 3dB/oct 3dB/oct 3dB/oct L0,L1 Anti-alias A2 CSP Pole –Zero 100 us PWO (PHOS) Tower(EMCal) Ethernet DCS glue dcs siu branchA APD APD Low gain R R - - . . bias PHOS 40 / EMCal 33 Trigger Region Units RCU fibers Xtals 210…400V differtl. cables PHOS M=50 EMCal M=30 TRU A->D individual APD L0 TMU HV bias +HV 400V to CTP TRU JET control L1 2 *2 analog Sums PHOS 112 EMCal 119inputs 3 32 channel APD bias control PHOS+EMCal 3.1-Gbit/s opt. links TMU Level-1 EMCal only • L1 (6 ms): 2x2 tower analog sum TRU 4x4 tower peak finder • EMCal: 12 FEE/GTL bus 12*32=384 towers/TRU • configure as 16*24 towers Dh x Df~0.22 x 0.34
Cartoon of jet patch trigger Summary TRU Low-latency serial pass-through Low-latency serial pass-through Low-latency serial pass-through …………… TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers TRU ~400 towers Jet patch trigger Max aggregate input bandwidth= 3 Gbit/s latency 1-2 ms < 100 Mbit/s ~100 bits/evt 13K towers ~ 30 TRUs
First TRU card proto ( PHOS) 3 x 3.1 Gbit optical I/O links, 1 V0 optical input EMCal I/O Common PHOS/EMCal 112 ADC’s 12 bit @40 MHz Analog inputs from FEE card RCU bus USB diagn.
L0 timing: simplest algorithm OK Pack and ship every bunch crossing (75 bits/TRU?):
L1 timing: simplest algorithm Just the data transfer takes too long! Simplest approach: no bunch filter at L0 Lumi loss due to pileup need local L0? Need to filter at TRU1 based on global L0
Bunch Filter 0.15 Gbit/s 0.15 Gbit/s 0.15 Gbit/s 34 Gbit/s 34 Gbit/s 34 Gbit/s • Initially planned major design effort not required ! -> TMU / SMU cards from TRD can do the job <- • Major step forward for building JET proto within 1 year 9x Level-0 @ 1.2 us
Bunch filter implementation with TMU and SMU 1 optical Output 3.1 Gbit/s Common LVDS I/O bus Compact PCI bus 64 bit SMU TTC TMU Level-0 trigger: from TTC @ 1200 ns after Bx L0 FiFo Transfer selection: L0 at 1.2 us, max 200 kHz Xilinx Virtex-IV FPGA Input: 11 x 3.1Gbit/s One SMU /DCS card for n TMU cards ( assume n=3) 11 optical inputs ( 1/3rd of TRU) pre-selected bunch packets from TRU
SMU concentrator cards with ALICE DCS ethernet and TTC link ( LHC clock, bunch count, L0,L1)
TMU/SMU crate for EMCal JET SYS empty TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU SMU SMU DCS TTC DCS TTC Need space for 2 Compact PCI crates TRU Jet Trigger out TTC Ethernet 1 Gbit fiber output LVDS communication bus Water-cooled PS Rocket I/O fiber connections SYS empty 99 Gbit fiber inputs from 33 TRU -> 9 TMU
EMCal system overview dcs dcs TMU TMU TMU TMU TMU ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC ADC Time after Bx Comment BW 6000 ns Level-1 yes/No Output L1 40 MHz NRZ V0(10 Multiplicity bits) Patch search of JET over V0-defined threshold TRU 1 GTL branch Level-1-JET 2000 ns Input Max: 1.35 Gbit/s CTP 1 optical R/IO link ( 2 spares) 10 x TMU+ 3 x dcs +1 TRU L0-triggered forwarding of selected packets 1750 ns 3 3 3 x 3 optical R/IO links 1 TMU Output Max: 0.15 Gbit/s dcs 1500 ns L0-packets->out L0 <= 200 kHz TTC LTC 1200 ns (lev-0) level-0 selection 1050 ns DCS, Ethernet Packet synch -> FiFo 1 TMU Input 11 x 3.1 Gbit/s Level-0 3 x Level-1 3 x 11 3 x 11 3 x 11 33 TRU 33 Xmit 10-bunch Packets750bit/250 ns 1 link=32 TRU channels 3 x 3 x 11 optical R/IO links 3.1 Gbit/s digital Bunch sync / reset Trigger-OR 800 ns Level-0 (600 ns) 1 TRU output Max: 9.3 Gbit/s 3 TRU Bunch Thresh: max 2 of 10 TRU 320 ns 3x 3 x Level-1 155 ns 1 TRU Input: 96 x 0.48Gbit/s = 46 Gbit/s analogue->digital 12 bit 12 DAQ +HLT 12 1 TRU input channel = analogue OR of 2x2 towers 22 x RCU 44 branches 22 DDL RCU RCU 12 x 8 Analogue Fast OR (100 ns) 150 ns 9 FEE/GTL branch analogue 396 x FEE 100 ns quad shaper FEE FEE FEE Ne ->CSP Steo Voltage 32 36 FEE/SM 4 g -> Ne conversion 11 Super-Modules 1 Super-Module = 12 x 24 Modules 12 g 24 12672 x APD / CSP / Towers Particle TOF collision o
Jet trigger summary • Estimated cost: ~ SFr 100K-150K • Relaxed schedule relative to other project issues: • jet trigger effective only for ~full device and high lumi • current plans: commission late ’08 • Technical solutions may be in hand now (thanks to TRD) • Participating institutions: CERN (H. Muller), LBNL, Grenoble, Nantes, ORNL,…