450 likes | 610 Views
Elk Run Interchange Design-Build Project S.P. 2505- 48 (TH 52) PROJECT INFORMATIONAL MEETING. March 26, 2010. INTRODUCTION Terry Ward, Mn/DOT District 6 Mn/DOT Project Manager. DISCLAIMER
E N D
Elk Run Interchange Design-Build ProjectS.P. 2505- 48 (TH 52)PROJECT INFORMATIONAL MEETING March 26, 2010
INTRODUCTION Terry Ward, Mn/DOT District 6 Mn/DOT Project Manager
DISCLAIMER What is discussed today is informational only, meant to assist interested teams in the pursuit of this project. The ultimate contract requirements will be included in the Request for Proposals (RFP). There may be changes between now and the time the RFP is issued.
Project Partners • City of Pine Island • WSN • Olmsted County • Goodhue County • Federal Highway Administration • Design-Build Proposers • HNTB – Design-Build Contract Development • SRF • Preliminary Geometric Layouts • Environmental Documents • Tower Investments, LLC • Other firms listed in RFQ
Agenda • Previous RFQ / SOQ Procurement • Project Background • Design-Build Procurement • Design-Build Activity • Questions
Cancelled Procurement Letter on DB WebsiteSOQ’s are confidential until project awardSOQ evaluation materials are confidential until project awardSOQ’s will not be returned to contractors until after award Previous RFQ / SOQ Procurement
Elk Run AUAR • Full Build-Out – 5,157 Acres • Residential – 3,860 acres • Commercial – 680 acres • BioScience – 208 acres • Institutional – 410 • Park and ROW – included in Residential
City of Pine Island • Abraham Algadi, City Administrator • Project Issues • Development Issues
Background http://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/
Information for Bidders http://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/elkrun/index.html
Information for Bidders Project Informational Meeting Presentation Preliminary Geometric Layout Utilities Layout Value Engineering Study Tower Right-of-Way Map Bridge 97287 Design Files Soil Boring information Public Meetings Initial RFQ materials – Addendums etc.
Conflict of Interest • Single Point of Contact • terry.ward@state.mn.us
Letters of Interest (LOI) Received Alliant Engineering, Inc. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. Duininck Incorporated Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. Hoffman Construction Co. Jacobs Lunda Construction Company Mathiowetz Construction Company Minnowa Construction, Inc. PBS&J Pierce Pini & Associates, Inc.
Letters of Interest (LOI) Received Reilly Construction Co., Inc. RLK Incorporated Rochester Sand & Gravel SEH Shafer Contracting Co., Inc. Stanley Consultants, Inc. TKDA Ulland Bros., inc. URS Valley Paving incorporated Westwood WSN Yaggy Colby Associates
ScheduleTentative – Subject to Change ACTIVITY Due Date Issue RFQ March 17, 2010 SOQ Due Date April 9, 2010 Determine Short List April 23, 2010 Issue RFP April 29, 2010 Project Letting July 30, 2010
Design-Build Best-Value • Request for Qualifications (RFQ) • Short-listing • Request for Proposals (RFP) • Technical Proposal • POSSIBLE CRITERIA: • Quality • Safety • Innovation – Roadway Geometric Design • Schedule Integration • Public Relations • Alternate Technical Concepts • Price Proposal
Request for Qualifications • Issued March 17, 2010 • Project Goals: • Design and Construct a Quality product. • Increase Long Term Performance using Quality Materials and Construction Methods. • Design and Construct a Safe project. • Maximize the roadway geometric design via Innovation for cost effectiveness and efficiency. • Integrate Interchange project schedule with development schedule. • Public Relations
Request for Qualifications • Added Olmsted CSAH 12 Realignment • RFP Stipend – $150,000 • Page limit increased from 15 to 17 • Electronic SOQ Submittal • Modified some Key Personnel • Scoring • 100 pt. scale
Request for Qualifications • Estimated Cost $35 - $40 million • Maximum Price Cap - $40 million • Mn/DOT Single Point of Contact • terry.ward@state.mn.us
Status • Funding • Right of Way • Tower ROW • Olmsted County Property • Other Parcels • Geotechnical • Utilities • Roadway Geometric Layout • EA Update • Municipal Consent
Design-Build General Discussion Points • Staged Approach to Delivery • All construction completed by 2012. • Co-Housing – probably not. • Teams need to think about communications and issue resolution. May required Design-Builder to co-locate during Design Phase • Roadway Design Flexibility • Roundabouts
Proposer Project Site AccessContact: Terry WardMay need a Mn/DOT Permit