510 likes | 648 Views
The Extreme BMP Makeover: James River Edition. P hoto Source: James River Assoc. Laurel Woodworth Middle James Roundtable Annual Meeting March 25, 2010. About Us. Non-profit 501(c)3, non-advocacy organization Work with local watershed groups, local, state, and federal governments
E N D
The Extreme BMP Makeover:James River Edition Photo Source: James River Assoc. Laurel Woodworth Middle James Roundtable Annual Meeting March 25, 2010
About Us • Non-profit 501(c)3, non-advocacy organization • Work with local watershed groups, local, state, and federal governments • Provide tools communities need to protect streams, lakes, and rivers
The Problem: • Urban land use in the James Basin will increase to 12% by 2020 • 2,000 acres/year of new impervious cover (estimate) • Widespread approval of poorly performing stormwater BMPs • Many BMPs NOT functioning as designed • Poor design, installation, or maintenance Source: USDA - NRCS
Extreme BMP Makeover: • Improve next generation of urban stormwater BMPs • Systematic way to Incorporate LID/ESD • Disseminate design information to James River Basin & Chesapeake Bay Watershed • Coordinate with Virginia regulatory & Handbook changes • Accelerate adoption of improved designs in James River “Early Adopter” communities • Focus on nutrient removal (Phosphorus)
Project Partners • Early Adopters: • Albemarle County • Henrico County • Chesterfield County • James City County • Hampton Roads Planning District • James River Association • Hampton Roads PDC • Chesapeake Stormwater Network
Summary of Tasks: • Form Early Adopter agreements (2008) • Update BMP Research – Runoff Reduction Method (2008) • BMP Field Performance Study (2008) • Local Gov’t Program Assessments (2008) • Workshops & Design Charettes (2008 – 10) • BMP Demonstration Projects – retrofits (2009) • Bay-Wide Training workshop (2010) • Technology transfer to James Basin & beyond
Runoff Reduction Method www.dcr.virginia.gov/lr2f.shtml Updated BMP Research w/ nutrient removal & runoff reduction values #1 = TECH MEMO: #2 = SPREADSHEET:
Benefits of RR Method • Wider spectrum of BMP types given credit • Green Roof, Cisterns • Soil Amendments, Filter Strips • Sheetflow to Open Space • Allows more flexibility in BMP options • Assigns nutrient removal rates to BMPs • More specificity in design guidelines
VA Stormwater Regs & Handbook revisions • Extreme BMP Makeover research tied into revisions of VA regulations • Center and CSN providing technical tools: • Spreadsheet for site BMP planning & nutrient accounting • 11 DCR charettes; 300+ local gov’t staff, design consultants, and state agency staff • Draft design standards incorporated into new VA stormwater Handbook www.vwrrc.vt.edu/swc/StandardsSpecs.html
BMP Field Survey: • ~200 BMPs in survey sample • Visual screening, NOT sampling water quality • Targeted BMPs: Newer types • Infiltration = 20% • Bioretention = 20% • Constructed wetlands = 14% • Dry swales = 10% • Others
Visual assessments of… • Installation Quality • Placement / Integration into Site • Sizing • Flow Paths • Stability • Vegetative Health • Soil Texture • Maintenance • Overall performance score
BMP Geometry • General flow path • Relation of inlets to outlets • Length/Width ratio • Shortest flow path
L/W = 3.4:1 Outlet Inlet
L/W = 8.9:1 Outlet Inlet
Outlet Weir Grass Channel Inlet
SFP = 25’/315’ Inlets Outlet
Outlet Last Curb Cut
Deviations from design plans • 46% surveyed deviated from plans • Vegetation composition – 18% • Dimensions / volume – 13% • Soil composition – 10%
Water Qual. Vol. Discrepancies Overall, most BMPs properly-sized or oversized. Of those undersized, bioretention and dry swales were the main culprits.
Filter / Soil Media Problems Compacted bioretention soil (left) with high clay content (right)
What percent of BMPs show signs of lack of maintenance? CAN YOU GUESS?
Vegetation: Too much, too little – what’s the intended palette?
Are YOUR inspectors this adventurous? Maintenance Access • BMP not very visible • Bad or NO maintenance access
Maintenance Recommendations • Maintenance Access • Plan for sediment removal • Target vegetative communities at 1-year, 5-year, 10-year intervals • Stable slope grades
Recommendations: Ch. 7 • Design • Construction • Maintenance • Also includes programmatic recommendations www.cwp.org
About The Partnership: • For SW designers – local gov’t & private sector • VA, MD, WV, and D.C. • 3-tiered training program • Free or low-cost • Webcasts • 1-day workshops • Intensive “master” SW design seminars • Direct technical assistance (limited) • Self-guided web-based learning modules