1 / 20

Implementation of Innovations at FSMN 2002 - 2005

Implementation of Innovations at FSMN 2002 - 2005. b y Miroslav Ćirić & Predrag Krtolica. Contents. Short History Principles S ubjects Open Questions Conclusion. Short History. 3 years ago TEMPUS project CD JEP 16160 – 2001 was started.

udell
Download Presentation

Implementation of Innovations at FSMN 2002 - 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation of Innovations atFSMN 2002 - 2005 by Miroslav Ćirić & Predrag Krtolica

  2. Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion

  3. Short History • 3 years ago TEMPUS project CD JEP 16160 – 2001 was started. • We planed to reorganize our CS studies only in few subjects. • This includes: • changes in some subjects syllabi, • introducing new subjects, • producing the supporting material, • purchasing equipment, and • staff retraining.

  4. Short History • So far, we have reorganized courses in Data Structures & Data Bases and Computer Systems. • Also we have introduced new courses in: • Information Technologies, • Intagrated Software Packages, • Informatics Didactics, • Security and Cryptography, • Business Informatics.

  5. Short History • Lecture presentations and/or teaching material are posed at faculty WEB site for a number of subjects: • Data Structures & Data Bases, • Computer Systems, • Operating Systems, • Parallel processing, • Integrated Software Packages, • Mathematical Logic, • Languages and Automata, etc.

  6. Short History • Most of teachers use multimedia now. • Purchased equipment • 5 PCs, • 1 LJ printer, • 1 photocopy machine, • 1 binding machine, and • a number of books. • Before the end of project we will purchase 5 more PCs. • Equipment is used for preparing teaching material.

  7. Short History • We have performed a number of short visits to the partner institutions including the retraining of teaching staff. • Exchanging the experiences and information about curricula in partner institutions was of the crucial importance!

  8. Short History • Meanwhile, we realized that we need completely new studies. • At TEMPUS meeting in Ohrid (September, 2004) we have presented new curricula proposal in first version. • We have also promised to inform you about future progress. • Important circumstance: new university law is about to be adopted in spring 2005.

  9. Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion

  10. Principles • We follow recommended area according to CC2001. • Subject are designed pretty much on our own. • We have defined forest of the subject precedence with list of compulsory and elective subjects.

  11. Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion

  12. Subjects • In the following list we present subjects allocated in the earliest semesters when they can be taken. • Also, we marked compulsories and electives. • Hypothetic modules of electives are defined too, but they would not be imposed to the students and they are not marked in the following list.

  13. Compulsory at introductory level Subjects – First Year

  14. Subjects – Second Year Compulsory at introductory level Compulsory at intermediate level Advanced level electives

  15. Subjects – Third Year Compulsory at intermediate level Compulsory at advanced level Advanced level electives

  16. Subjects – Forth Year Advanced level electives Compulsory at advanced level

  17. Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion

  18. Open Questions • We need final recheck of the proposal before put it in the procedure. • Credits! Very important but still not quite clear.

  19. Contents • Short History • Principles • Subjects • Open Questions • Conclusion

  20. Conclusion • Earlier law limitations apparently will be removed sun. • This make local acceptance more probable. • We can not be very wrong. This curricula should not last more then 5 years.

More Related