240 likes | 375 Views
Pakistan 4590.2010. http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/pakistan.pdf http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/pakistan_map.htm. Start from the present. Taliban Attacks in Pakistan (NY Times) Class Dismissed (NY Times) Drone attacks Floods. images.
E N D
http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/pakistan.pdfhttp://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/pakistan.pdf • http://www.nationsonline.org/oneworld/map/pakistan_map.htm
Start from the present • Taliban Attacks in Pakistan (NY Times) • Class Dismissed (NY Times) • Drone attacks • Floods
images • http://boingboing.net/2010/03/04/us-drone-attacks-in.html • http://www.google.ca/images?hl=en&source=imghp&biw=1280&bih=565&q=drone+attack+in+pakistan&gbv=2&aq=1&aqi=g4&aql=&oq=drone+atta&gs_rfai=
Some basics… • Independence on August 14, 1947 • East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and West Pakistan • 4 provinces: Sindh, Punjab, Balochistan, NWFP • 3 territories: Azad Kashmir, Federally Administered Tribal Areas, and Gilgit-Baltistan • National language is Urdu - but most people speak Punjabi (60-70%)
Sources of power • Religion • Military • State • Salariat • Land • Social power?
Alavi • “This elitist underpinning of state formation in Pakistan, (which is quite different from Bangladesh where a popular revolution was at the basis of state formation) was fully reflected in the kind of social configuration that emerged after Independence. Four dominant social groups : the military, the ulema, the salariat and the landed classes
Religion • Basis of unity for the Pakistani nation-state: “Muslims are a nation according to any definition of a nation, and they must have their homelands, their territory, and their state.” (Jinnah, 1940) • “We are starting with this fundamental principle that we are all citizens and equals of one State…I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense…but in the political sense as citizens of the State” (Jinnah, 1947)
Religion (2) • 3 constitutions since independence (1956, 1962, 1973) each reiterating the importance of Islam • The last iteration (1973) of the constitution came after the cessation of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in 1971
Role of Religion in the State • The Ulema were against the creation of the Pakistani state because they were not interested in sovereignty based on territorial/cultural definitions • However, when Pakistan gained independence, they were/are very vocal about the formal implementation of Islamic law in Pakistan • Jamaat-i-Islami party is a major proponent of this vision of the Pakistani State • Maulana Maududi (founder of Jamaat-i-Islami Party): “Political power is essential for protecting the Islamic system of life from deterioration and perversion…for the enforcement of all those laws that require the sanction of the state and the judiciary for their operation”
Role of Religion in the State • The various degrees of state secularity/religiousity of different governments demonstrates the difficulties, at the state level, to articulate the role of Islam in the state • Zia-ul-Haq’s government (1973-1988) came closest to implementing Shariah law through its ‘Islamization programs’, but no federal government has fully implemented Shariah Law • Shariah Law has existed, however, in certain territories
Religion and women “Rules governing the (family) – marriage, inheritance, divorce – have legally been conceded, in Pakistan as in many other Muslim countries, as the preserve of religious authorities and a particular constituted religious morality. This has two consequences. First, in areas where women have most immediately been subordinated such as the family, the discourse has been conducted predominantly within religious parameters.
“when women demand legal changes or legal equality, they must directly confront religious authority and institutions. In societies where Islamic fundamentalism is experiencing a resurgence, consequent upon the failure of the bourgeois elements and of the left, this means not just a cultural confrontation but a political one as well”. (Bhasin et al: 17-18).
Political Economy of Defence • Ayesha Jalal (1995) has argued that Pakistan’s overdeveloped military has had determinative effects on Pakistan’s political economy • She argues that there is a key difference between the political economies of India and Pakistan: • India has a ‘political economy of development’ • Pakistan has a ‘political economy of defence’
Political Economy of Defence • First decade after independence, Pakistani military and civil administration took up 3/4 of the federal budget • Military governments • Ayub Khan (1958) • Zia-ul Haq (1977) • Pervez Musharraf (1999)
Political Economy of Defence • Class aspect of military is tied to the extent to which the military has been able to infiltrate key economic structures/entities • Military presence can be felt in: housing developments, agriculture, transportation, oil/gas, defence production, hospitals, schools • Greater upward mobility for military personnel and their families because of access to better social services (schools, hospitals)
Political Economy of Defence • “Dominance of non-elected institutions in Pakistan…points to a disjunction between state power and class power” (Jalal, 144) • Support of landowning families alongside failure to bring about effective land reforms • Mutually constitutive relationship between dominant social classes and military i.e. members of military entereing dominant social classes, and dominant social classes being protected by military
Political Economy of Defence • Why military overdevelopment? • Pakistan: On a Razor’s Edge
Opposition to military • The military has been met with opposition from other political parties • But many of the same parties have often worked in tandem with the military to secure their power • The times where political parties have emerged in opposition to the military is connected to the degree of economic marginalization in the country
Opposition to military • Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (Pakistan People’s Party) took power in 1971 in the context of unrest in rural areas, including rural Punjab • “Roti, kapra, aur makaan” - bread, clothes, and shelter • (1971-1977) Glimmer of democracy • Bhutto legacy (dynasty) is very strong but is also often romanticized (ex. treatment mohajirs) • Post-Zia - “constitutional coups”
Strategic Importance of Pakistan in International Relations • Pakistan’s neighbours - Afghanistan, Iran, India, China • Cold War • War on Terror • Not separate from overdevelopment of military
Major markers • Extreme inequality of wealth and power • US dependence/aid • Debt • Bangladesh • India
Conclusion: Where are we now? • Military operations in the Swat and Waziristan • Displacement of 2 million people (refugee camps, other cities) • Relationship with US • Role of the Pakistani establishment • Civil society