1 / 9

Aims of Workshop

Developing and adapting evidence-based social work interventions in the UK: the example of Families And Schools Together (FAST). Dr. Lynn McDonald, Brunel University Dr. Mary Pat Sullivan, Brunel University Dr. Donald Forrester, University of Bedfordshire. Aims of Workshop.

urbana
Download Presentation

Aims of Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing and adapting evidence-based social work interventions in the UK: the example of Families And Schools Together (FAST) Dr. Lynn McDonald, Brunel UniversityDr. Mary Pat Sullivan, Brunel UniversityDr. Donald Forrester, University of Bedfordshire

  2. Aims of Workshop • To explore issues in developing and delivering “evidence based” interventions • FAST used as an example – the workshop is not about FAST but about EBP • Aim to explore EBP in theory and practice • Concerned at lack of social work involvement in producing evidence based approaches

  3. What is EBP? “the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions regarding the welfare of those in need” Sheldon and Chilvers 2002 • Seems self-evidently a good idea • Yet topic of great controversy

  4. Nature of EBP • Based on medical approach • Within this Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) seen as the “gold standard” • Develop evidence with generalisable applicability

  5. Social Model critique • Social model critical of terms used – this makes RCT approach problematic • Child abuse not the same as cholera • Tendency to individualise problems – RCTs rarely consider social change

  6. Criticisms of scientific method Particularly RCTs • RCTs of psycho-social interventions not generalisable in same way • Context vital for RCTs • Problematises interpretation of evidence

  7. Criticisms of values At odds with those of social work? • Doing EBP “to” – not with – service users. What of the voice of the client? • EBP perhaps ignores issues of difference eg race, gender, sexuality etc. • The individual-in-society infinitely complex and therefore “one size fits all” not possible • EBP tool of managerialism – central control and “manualisation” of practice

  8. Reconceptualising EBP • These criticisms all apply to EBP as it may be or is – not as it could - or SHOULD - be • Reconceptualisation of EBP needs to: • Take account of “social model” in defining, understanding and intervening • Understand the strengths AND limitations of RCTs • Be consistent with social work values

  9. EBP and FAST • Families and Schools Together – a social work “evidence based” approach • Want to explore: • How FAST developed • The social model and social work values in an evidence based approach • Issues around generalisability and adaptation

More Related