530 likes | 764 Views
Introduction and overview of FFAG accelerators. S. Machida CCLRC-ASTeC 7 February, 2006 http://hadron.kek.jp/~machida/doc/nufact/ ffag/machida_20060207.ppt & pdf. Contents . Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) Revival (6) Recent activities (12)
E N D
Introduction and overview of FFAG accelerators S. Machida CCLRC-ASTeC 7 February, 2006 http://hadron.kek.jp/~machida/doc/nufact/ ffag/machida_20060207.ppt & pdf
Contents • Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) • Revival (6) • Recent activities (12) • Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration (13) • Non-scaling FFAG for other applications (1) • Summary (1)
Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) • Revival (6) • Recent activities (12) • Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration (13) • Non-scaling FFAG for other applications (1) • Summary (1)
Accelerators of medium energy (< GeV) cyclotron synchrotron • In uniform and fixed field, revolution frequency is constant. • Cyclotron produces continuous beams, but fixed energy. • No focusing in longitudinal direction. Weak focusing in transverse direction. • Bunch current is limited by longitudinal space charge. • 590 MeV is maximum. • Magnetic fields increases synchronized with beam momentum. • Beams go through a fixed orbit. Accelerated beams are available only as a pulse. • Focusing in longitudinal direction. Strong focusing in transverse direction. • Bunch current is limited by transverse space charge. • Energy frontier machine. Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
FFAG (Fixed Field Alternating Gradient) • Fixed field like cyclotron • No feedback between magnet and RF. Operation is easier. • Cost of power supply is low. • Repetition can be higher and make high average current. • (strong) Focusing in both longitudinal and transverse direction like synchrotron • More particles can be accelerated. • Beam size is smaller and vacuum chamber is smaller. • Variable energy like synchrotron • Medium energy machine is usually multi-purpose. Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
Comparison strong point weak point Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
FFAG accelerator • Invented in early 1950s. • Ohkawa in Japan, Symon in US, and Kolomenski in USSR. • Research program at MURA (Midwestern University Research Associate) in US • Construction of electron FFAG of 180, 400 keV, and 40 MeV. • Proposal of 30 GeV proton FFAG Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
Good old days at MURA Chandrasekhar Bohr 400 keV radial sector 180 keV spiral sector All are electron FFAG. 40 MeV two beam accelerator Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
How does FFAG work? (field profile) • Bending radius cannot be constant for all momentum. However, sharp rise of field makes orbit shift small. • Focusing force can be constant if the field gradient increases with radius. • Proposed field profile in radial direction is k >1 Orbit of low p Orbit of high p Bz(r) Gradient of high p Gradient of low p r Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
How does FFAG work? (transverse focusing) • Alternating gradient can be realized by two ways. • F(q) has alternating sign. radial sector • Add edge focusing. spiral sector Bz(r) r + r Bz(r) Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
How does FFAG work?(radial and spiral sector) Radial sector consists of normal and reverse bends. Spiral sector use edge to have vertical focusing. machine center machine center Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
How does FFAG work? (cardinal conditions) • Geometrical similarity r0 : average curvature r : local curvature q : generalized azimuth • Constancy of k at corresponding orbit points k : index of the magnetic field • The field satisfies the scaling law. • Tune is constant independent of momentum: scaling FFAG Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
A way to change output energy • Change k value by trim coils. • Low momentum particle will reach the outer (extraction) orbit with low k. Bz(r) k (high) extraction momentum with high k. (Bz(r)h*rex) extraction momentum with low k. (Bz(r)l*rex) k (low) r injection radius extraction radius Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
Three reasons to stop development Development is stopped in late 1960s because, • Magnet design was complicated. It was hard to get desired 3-D fields profile in practice. • No material for RF cavity. It requires high shunt impedance, high response time, and wide aperture. • Synchrotron was more compact and better choice for accelerator of high energy frontier. Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG
Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) • Revival (6) • Recent activities (12) • Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration (13) • Non-scaling FFAG for other applications (1) • Summary (1)
Revival in late 1990s Technology becomes ready and enough reason to re-start development, • 3-D calculation code such as TOSCA becomes available. Static fields can be modeled precisely. • RF cavity with Magnetic Alloy (FINEMET as an example) has most suitable properties for FFAG. • Growing demands for fast cycling, large acceptance, and high intensity in medium energy accelerator regime. revival
Magnet can be made with 3-D modeling code With an accuracy of 1%, 3-D design of magnet with complex shape becomes possible. Spiral shaped magnet for Kyoto-U FFAG (yoke with blue). revival
RF cavity with new material (MA) • mQF remains constant at high RF magnetic RF (Brf) more than 2 kG • Ferrite has larger value at low field, but drops rapidly. • RF field gradient is saturated. Magnetic Alloy also has • High curie temperature ~570 deg. • Thin tape (large core can be made) ~18 mm • Q is small (broadband) ~0.6 revival
Magnet for large acceptance • From 1980s’, high intensity machine is demanded, not only high energy. • Ordinary AG machine needs large aperture magnet to accommodate large emittance beam. Quad of J-PARC 3 GeV synchrotron Magnet of 150 MeV FFAG revival
First proton FFAG at KEK • With all those new technology, proton FFAG (proof of principle) was constructed and a beam is accelerated in June 2000. revival
What we achieved from PoP FFAG • Design procedure. • FFAG accelerator works as we expected. • 3-D modeling of magnet is accurate enough. • 1 ms acceleration (1 kHz operation) is possible. • MA cavity gives enough voltage. • Enough acceptance in both longitudinal and transverse. • Beam dynamics study • Multi-bucket acceleration • Acceleration with fixed frequency RF bucket • Resonance crossing, preliminary result revival
Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) • Revival (6) • Recent activities (12) • Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration (13) • Non-scaling FFAG for other applications (1) • Summary (1)
Three new programs started in Japan • Hadron therapy prototype • 150 MeV (initially aimed at 200 MeV) • Status: Completed. • Muon phase rotation • PRISM • Status: Under construction. • ADSR (accelerator driven sub-critical reactor) • Three cascade FFAGs to 150 MeV as a neutron source • Status: 1st spiral FFAG just starts commissioning. Recent activities
Hadron therapy prototype • 150 MeV, 100 Hz, ~10 nA • Why FFAG for hadron therapy ? • Easy operation. • High average intensity (more dose, more patients per year). • Spot scanning with high repetition pulses is possible. • Variable energy and acceleration of many ion species. Recent activities
Broad beam method (Conventional) vs. Spot scanning method • Inevitable irradiation outside of the treatment field. • Each patient needs his own shaped bolus. • A small beam spot makes it possible to irradiate a well defined area. • Non-uniform irradiation in the area is possible. Ridge filter vs. Bolus Final collimator Recent activities
Acceleration and extraction Beam signal during acceleration. Extraction efficiency is ~60% at the moment. (1.5 nA.) Recent activities
r cm PRISM • Momentum acceptance of +- 30%. • Central momentum is 68 MeV/c. • Why FFAG for phase rotation ? • Large acceptance in longitudinal and transverse. • Multiple use of RF cavity. • Prototype of muon accelerator. • Injection and extraction kicker are necessary. Recent activities
Accelerator Driven Sub-critical Reactor • 150 MeV (1 GeV in future), 1 mA (100 mA in future). • Why FFAG for ADSR ? • Stable operation (a fewer trip) compared with linac. • Almost DC beams. No difference between DC and 1 kHz for target. • 1 GeV machine is no problem compared with cyclotron. • High average current. Recent activities
Spiral injector FFAG • Commissioning just started. • Variable energy with different k value is demonstrated. Recent activities
More projects are coming • Hadron therapy machine in Ibaraki prefecture • Neutron source for BNCT • Industrial applications • Neutrino factory Recent activities
Hadron therapy machine in Ibaraki prefecture Recent activities
Neutron source of BNCT (Boron Neutron CaptureTherapy) • Reactor was the only neutron source. • With FFAG, similar neutron intensity is expected. Proposed neutron source (Mori) Kyoto-U reactor Recent activities
Neutrino factory • In 2001, Japanese proposed neutrino factory based on FFAG muon accelerator. Recent activities
Problems to be solved(there are still many) • Interference between main magnet and peripheral devices such as injection, extraction, and RF elements. • Beam diagnostics. • High intensity operation. • H- injection. • More efficient RF cavity. • … • Projects and R&Ds are going on in parallel. Recent activities
Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) • Revival (6) • Recent activities (12) • Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration (13) • Non-scaling FFAG for other applications (1) • Summary (1)
Bz(r) Bz(r) r r All of those FFAGs are conventionalscaling FFAG • If we can break scaling law, FFAG will be much simpler and magnet will be smaller. • Why do we keep scaling (constant tune) during acceleration? Because of resonance in accelerator. No gentle slope at low momentum. - Orbit excursion is shorter. Constant gradient. - Linear magnet. Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
ny nx Resonances in accelerators • There are many resonances near operating tune. Once a particle hits one of them, (we think) it will be lost. In reality, however, operating tune moves due to imperfection of magnet (red zigzag line). • Particles can survive after crossing resonances if resonance is weak and crossing is fast. Tune diagram of 150 MeV FFAG Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Non-scaling FFAG • Muons circulate only a few (~15) turns in FFAG. • Is resonance really harmful to a beam? Maybe not. • Forget scaling law ! • Let us operate ordinary AG synchrotron without ramping magnet. • Orbit moves as momentum increases. • Large ap makes the orbit shift small. • Focusing force decreases as momentum increases. Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Orbit for different momentum • Orbit shifts more at larger dispersion section. • No similar shape unlike scaling FFAG. high p low p non-scaling Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Tune variation in a cycle • Tune decreases as a beam is accelerated. • dn(tune)/dT(turn)~1 for muon rings. low p high p Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Acceleration (1) • Acceleration is so quick that RF frequency cannot be synchronized with revolution frequency of muons. • In a first half of a cycle, path length becomes shorter and revolution frequency becomes higher. In a second half of a cycle, path length becomes longer and revolution frequency becomes lower. • Suppose we choose RF frequency that is synchronized with revolution frequency at the center. In the first half of a cycle, a particle lags behind the RF. At the center, a particle is synchronized with RF. In the second half, a particle lags again. low center high voltage time of flight time momentum Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Acceleration (2) • In the longitudinal phase space, a particle follows the path with constant color. • If there is enough RF voltage, a particle can be accelerated to the top energy. • This is called “Gutter acceleration”. extraction dp/p (normalized) injection Phase (1/2 pi) Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Beam dynamics issues • Acceleration out of RF bucket. “Gutter” acceleration. • Mismatch in longitudinal and transverse . • With finite initial transverse amplitude. • Crossing of many resonances during acceleration. • Structure resonance has some effects. • With alignment errors, integer resonances have to be considered. • Huge acceptance (30,000 p mm-mrad) for muons. • Dynamic aperture without acceleration at injection energy. Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
“Gutter” acceleration Finite transverse amplitude Longitudinal phase space (phi, momentum) without transverse amplitude 5 to 10 GeV ring with finite transverse amplitude Horizontal is 5,000 pi mm mrad Vertical is zero Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Resonance crossing without errors • Vertical is 5,000p mm-mrad, normalized, zero horizontal emittance. • Shows the coupling due to nx-2ny=0 (structure) resonance. • If we start finite horizontal and zero vertical emittance, no exchange of emittance. vertical emittance 5 GeV horizontal emittance 10 GeV Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Resonance crossing without errors, amplitude dependence 5,000 pi mm-mrad 500 pi mm-mrad 0.5 pi mm-mrad Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Resonance crossingwith alignment errors Beam has to face many integer tunes. tune per cell tune per ring Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Resonance crossing with alignment errors, envelope • Horizontal is 10,000p mm-mrad, normalized, zero vertical emittance. • Errors of 0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20 mm (rms). Horizontal phase space (x, xp) 0. mm 0.05 mm 0.10 mm 0.20 mm Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration
Cyclotron, synchrotron, and FFAG (11) • Revival (6) • Recent activities (12) • Non-scaling FFAG for muon acceleration (13) • Non-scaling FFAG for other applications (1) • Summary (1)
Issues • Emittance is much smaller than muons. • 30,000 pi mm-mrad vs. 300 pi mm-mrad • Half of the problems go away • Acceleration is much slower. • 15 turns vs. 15,000 turns • RF frequency modulation is possible. • Resonance crossing is much more serious problem. • Alignment tolerance • Errors of fields strength Non-scaling FFAG for other applications