1 / 22

Introduction of TRIZ History of TRIZ Contradiction Su-Field Analysis ARIZ Technology Evolution

Introduction of TRIZ History of TRIZ Contradiction Su-Field Analysis ARIZ Technology Evolution Trimming Case Study Knowledgist ver. 2.5. History of TRIZ. History of TRIZ. 1926 15 October 1940 First Invention (13-year-old) 1946 Military serves in Patent department

uri
Download Presentation

Introduction of TRIZ History of TRIZ Contradiction Su-Field Analysis ARIZ Technology Evolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction of TRIZ • History of TRIZ • Contradiction • Su-Field Analysis • ARIZ • Technology Evolution • Trimming • Case Study • Knowledgist ver. 2.5

  2. History of TRIZ

  3. History of TRIZ • 1926 15 October • 1940 First Invention (13-year-old) • 1946 Military serves in Patent department • 1946 Start of TRIZ development (20yr) • 1949 Two Grand Prix in inventors • competition (23yr), Letter to Stalin, Arrest • 1956 Freedom, first publication in journal • 1958 Journalist and Science Fiction • 1961 First book about TRIZ • 1971 Lecture at University in Baku • 1974 Publication Abroad (Japan) • 1981 More than 300 school in USSR • TRIZCON held & AI established in USA

  4. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960, Altshuller researched “Contradiction” Problem Solutions called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4) Overcoming Contradiction Breakthrough The typical engineering approach is to compromise, but that approach does not lead to an invention. An Invention overcomes the contradiction.

  5. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Problem Solutions called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4) Removal of Contradiction Breakthrough

  6. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Problem Solutions called “Inventive” (Level 3 and 4) Removal of Contradiction Breakthrough Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction Technical Contradiction 40 Principles Two Kinds of Contradiction Physical Contradiction Separation Principles

  7. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Technical Contradiction (Generally, as soon as an engineer solve one problem, another unexpected harmful results happen) Airplane : Speed , Weight . Two Kinds of Contradiction (by the powerful engine) (by the larger weight of engine) Chemical : Speed , Quality . reaction (by temperature increase) (undesired reaction also starts) Physical Contradiction (Generally, by one reason, an engineer must choose an action. But simultaneously an engineer must choose count-action by another reason ) Airplane : Landing Wheels must Exist, must not Exist. (for landing on earth) (for an air resistance at flying) Bicycle : Chain must be Rigid and Flexible. (to transfer big force) (for circular movement)

  8. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Physical Contradiction Separation Principles Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction • Separation in TIME • Separation in SPACE • Separation in SCALE . . . .

  9. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Physical Contradiction Separation Principles • Separation in TIME • Separation in SPACE • Separation in SCALE . . . .

  10. Contradiction • 1946 ~ 1960, “Contradiction” Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction Technical Contradiction 40 Principles divide an object into independent parts make an object easy to disassemble increase the degree of fragmentation (or segmentation) of an object 1 Segmentation 2 Separation … 35 Parameter change 36 Phase transitions … 40 Composite materials separate an 'interfering' part (or property) from an object, or single out the only necessary part (or property) of an object change an object`s physical state (e.g. to a gas, liquid, or solid), change the concentration or consistency, change the degree of flexibility, change the temperature. use phenomena occurring during phase transitions (e.g. volume changes, loss or absorption of heat, etc.). change from uniform to composite (multiple) materials

  11. Contradiction Is there any method to use 40 principles with easy ? Altshuller made standard vocabulary at engineering field as 39 Engineering Parameters.

  12. Contradiction Recommended principles by Altshuller ; usually 3 or 4 principles among 40 principles

  13. Su-Field Analysis • 1956 ~ 1970, Altshuller researched “Resource” In every technological system, one can discern two objects or substances, S1 and S2. [ex : two parts of system the system itself and its product the system and its environment] These substances interact or communicate through a field, F. [ex : Mechanical Acoustic Thermal Chemical Electric Magnetic etc] The relationship between the field and the two substances can be expressed in a Su-Field triangle. This triangle diagram may be thought of the technological system. It is of course a very simple, abstract model. More detailed models can be made by adding more nodes, linking triangles together, etc.

  14. Su-Field Analysis • 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different line symbols for the connections between nodes. If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents needs improvement ie, an inventive problem. The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram, which would be a modification of the original diagram.

  15. Su-Field Analysis • 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at more than one million patents 76 Standard Solutions Initial Problem Situation is described as graphic method The recommended solution by Altshuller for each specific situation is also described as graphic method described as graphic method called Su-Field Diagram

  16. ARIZ • 1970 ~ 1985, he researched Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. ARIZ Education at SAMSUNG by TRIZ Master Nikolai Khomenko

  17. ARIZ • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. • Step 1.Analyzing the Problem • 1.1. formulate the mini-problem • 1.2. define the conflicting elements • 1.3. describe graphic models for technical contradiction • 1.4. select a graphic model for further analysis • 1.5. intensify the conflict • 1.6. describe the problem model • 1.7. apply the inventive standards • Step 2.Analyzing the Problem Model • 2.1. define the operational zone (oz) • 2.2. define the operational time (ot) • 2.3. define the substance-field resources (sfr)

  18. ARIZ • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. • Step 3. Defining Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Physical Contradiction (PhC) • 3.1. formulate IFR-1 • 3.2. intensify definition of IFR-1 • 3.3. Identify the physical contradiction for the macro-level • 3.4. Identify the physical contradiction for the micro-level • 3.5. formulate IFR-2 • 3.6. apply the inventive standards to resolved physical contradiction • Step 4. Mobilizing and Utilizing of Substance-Field Resources (SFR) • 4.1. simulation with little creatures • 4.2. to take a"step back" from IFR • 4.3. using combination of substance resources • 4.4. using "void" • 4.5. using derived resources • 4.6. using an electrical field • 4.7. using a field and field-sensitive substance

  19. ARIZ • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. • Step 5. Apply the Knowledge Base • 5.1. applying the system of standard solutions for inventive problems • 5.2. applying the problem-analogous • 5.3. applying the principles for resolving the physical contradictions • 5.4. applying the pointer to physical effects and phenomena • Step 6. Changing or Substituting the Problem • 6.1. transition to the technical solution • 6.2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems • 6.3. changing the problem • 6.4. reformulation of mini-problem

  20. ARIZ • 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process Attention! ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study. • Step 7. Analyzing the Method of Resolving the Physical Contradiction • 7.1 checking the concept of solution • 7.2. preliminary estimation of the solution concept • 7.3. checking the priority of the solution through patent funds • 7.4. estimation of sub-problems to implement obtained solution concept • Step 8. Applying The Obtained Solution • 8.1. estimate of changes for super-system • 8.2. find new application for obtained solution • 8.3. apply solution concept for other problems • Step 9. Analyzing the Problem Solving Process • 9.1. compare proposed process and real • 9.2. compare obtained solution concept and knowledge from TRIZ

  21. Technology Evolution

  22. History of TRIZ • Contradiction • Su-Field Analysis • ARIZ • Technology Evolution • Trimming • Case Study • Knowledgist ver. 2.5 These three part is done separated material.

More Related