1 / 12

Structure of the academic year Senate June 2005 Professor Bob Craik

Structure of the academic year Senate June 2005 Professor Bob Craik. Objective to enhance student learning. Fewer, longer modules will enhance student learning whilst retaining flexibility (Senate Dec 04) Long study periods and large modules

urian
Download Presentation

Structure of the academic year Senate June 2005 Professor Bob Craik

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Structure of the academic year Senate June 2005 Professor Bob Craik

  2. Objective to enhance student learning Fewer, longer modules will enhance student learning whilst retaining flexibility (Senate Dec 04) • Long study periods and large modules • develop understanding, analysis and application • time for feedback and integrated coursework • cohesive and integrated course with greater emphasis on course objectives • opportunity for different types of learning

  3. Process • Senate agreed Dec 04 that restructuring would enhance learning and asked LTB to investigate further • 3 working groups undertook detailed investigation of academic structure, business processes and academic benefits • LTB concluded that the University should restructure but that resources and planning would be required • PME then considered further and agreed in principle to allocate the resources for restructuring

  4. PME decision • PME agreed that the University should adopt a two-block teaching an assessment structure not earlier than 2008-09 • PME further recommended that a two block structure should be implemented with appropriate resources, facilities, planning, infrastructure developments and timescales • 6 detailed points

  5. PME point of approval 1 • Prior to starting a 2 block structure there should be a revised student information system in place • Planning should assume a start in 2008-09 • Meets main RCB concerns

  6. PME point of approval 2 Academic structure Dundee/Edinburgh 11 2 11 6 4 weeks 3 weeks Heriot-Watt 12 2 12 4 3 weeks 3 weeks

  7. PME point of approval 3 • Still to be agreed • Module size (150 or 200 SEH) • Assessment rules and guidance • To be discussed with a view to early resolution

  8. PME point of approval 4 • The university should streamline its business processes (eg approval of course changes)

  9. PME point of approval 5 • A phased approach should be adopted • University level activities • Student record system • Business processes • Support for academic change • Schools should take responsibility for the pace of change in their school • Possible annual schedule in Appendix

  10. PME point of approval 6 • Steering group to develop and implement the plan • Convenor of LTB (Convenor) • Deputy Principal (Resources) • Director of Finance • Members of LTB • Others

  11. Structure of the academic year

  12. Annual Monitoring and Review • LTB, QESC, Deans etc have been reviewing APMR • Standard form no longer suitable for on-campus courses • Schools review programmes and report process, summary and action • Implement from this academic year • QESC to agree details with schools • Report to next Senate

More Related