1 / 9

2014 – 15 Title I Plan First Reading — January 14, 2014

2014 – 15 Title I Plan First Reading — January 14, 2014. Parent/Community Engagement. November 20, 2013 DAC reviewed student counts December 18, 2013 DAC reviewed/discussed proposed 2014-15 Title I Plan and School Allocations DAC formed a subcommittee to review proposed plans

ursula-norman
Download Presentation

2014 – 15 Title I Plan First Reading — January 14, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2014 – 15 Title I PlanFirst Reading — January 14, 2014

  2. Parent/Community Engagement • November 20, 2013 • DAC reviewed student counts • December 18, 2013 • DAC reviewed/discussed proposed 2014-15 Title I Plan and School Allocations • DAC formed a subcommittee to review proposed plans • Superintendent communicated her intention to keep the overall site funding at $15.4M • January 8, 2013 • DAC subcommittee convened with district staff • January 15, 2013 • DAC reviews subcommittee recommendations and Board discussion

  3. 2014-15 Title I Entitlement • Planning began with a projected decrease of 11% (influenced by sequestration and California’s relative share of national poverty) • Changes have now improved the outlook • Effect of sequestration is substantially reduced • Revised census information now indicates that California has slightly increased its share of national poverty • CDE still needs to determine required state-level set-asides before determining district allocations

  4. 2014-15 Site Allocations • Proposed amount remains at $15.4 million • Threshold remains the same, i.e., 40% • Distribution method remains the same, i.e., sliding scale • Declining enrollment results in the same amount of funding distributed to fewer students

  5. Required Reservations • 20% PI set-aside for SES and PISC (free tutoring and transportation) • 10% set-aside for professional development • 1% set-aside for parental involvement • Equitable participation for eligible students in private schools • Equitable participation for homeless students

  6. Not-Required Allocations • Parent Involvement activities beyond the minimum requirement • Site support for SSCs and SPSAs • Dropout prevention (Goal 5 in LEA Plan) • Administration of required PI activities, e.g., SES, PISC, parent notifications, PI Year 4 restructuring plans, LEA Plan revision • Assessment and data services • Indirect cost billed services

  7. Superintendent’s Priorities • Stability at sites — programs and staffing Continue but fund differently: • Class Size Reduction • Professional Development tied to the Common Core State Standards

  8. Superintendent’s Recommendations • Keep site allocation amount at prior level • Discontinue Title I funded class size reduction • Spend the legally-mandated minimum amount on professional development (10% of entitlement, including amounts required of schools in program improvement)

  9. Exhibits • Proposed 2014-15 Title I Budget • Proposed 2014-15 Title I School Ranking

More Related