240 likes | 403 Views
Case Study 2 – NiTi Quadrupole magnet. C. Bayer, L. Dassa , R. Principe, R. Vallcorba , D. Valuch , J. Vogt. [1]. 1 . Motivation. 1 . Motivation. Quadrupole magnet of NiTi for triplet. x. z. y. Emittence at 90%. [1]. 2 . Cable design. 2 . Cable design. Parameters.
E N D
Case Study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet C. Bayer, L. Dassa, R. Principe, R. Vallcorba, D. Valuch, J. Vogt
[1] 1. Motivation Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
1. Motivation Quadrupole magnetofNiTifortriplet x z y Emittenceat 90% Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
[1] 2. Cable design Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
2. Cable design Parameters N strand 40 Strand d (mm) 0.85 Cable width (mm) 17.5 Cable in thickn. (mm) 1.389 Cable out thickn. (mm) 1.59 Keystone angle 0.66 Ins 0.15 Cu% 54.5 Sc% 45.5 Cu/Sc ration 1.2 Area SC cable (mm²)10.328 Area copper cable (mm²)12.484 Area ins cable (mm²)31.853 Fill fact 0.324 Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
[1] 3. Magnetic gradient Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
3. Magnetic gradient • κ = 0.324 • w = 35 mm • = 146 T/m = 10.0 T Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
[1] 4. Current calculation Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
4. Current calculation Parameters Necessarycurrentdensity: Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
4. Current calculation Parameters Necessarycurrentdensity: Area inside cable 31.853 mm² Area SC cable 10.328 mm² Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
4. Current calculation Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
[1] 5. Mechanical stabilization Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
5. Mechanical stabilization • Thicknessfotheshrinkingcylinder4.2 mm + savetythickness Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
5. Mechanical stress of the mid plane Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
[1] 6. Iron yoke dimension Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
6. Ion yoke dimension Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
6. Ion yoke dimension increasingofthemainfieldby ~ 38% Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
[1] 7. Coil layout verification and optimization Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
7. Coil layout verification and optimization Twolayers, one wedge b6 = b10 = b14 = 0 [0 –21.5, 26.2 – 33.5] Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
7. Coil layout verification and optimization magnetcenter requestedaperture (120 mm) Twolayers, one wedge b6 = b10 = b14 = 0 [0 –21.5, 26.2 – 33.5] Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
7. Coil layout verification and optimization Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
7. Coil layout verification and optimization Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
Reference list Superconducting magnets for particle accelerators H. Felice, P. Ferracin, S. Prestamon, E. Todesco,http://etodesco.home.cern.ch/etodesco/, USPAS, 2011. Cable Design Optimization for HTS ApplicationsA. Ballarino, B. Bordini, L. Oberli, D. Richter,C. Scheuerlein and E. Seiler Magnetic DesignE. Todesco Superconductors for MagnetsR. Flükiger Mechanical design of superconducting accelerator magnetsF. Toral Basic course on accelerator opticsJ. Rossbach, DeutschesElektronen-Synchrotron DESYP. Schmüser, II. InstitutfürExperimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg, F.R. Germany Quadrupole Magnetshttp://www.lhc-facts.ch/img/quadrupol/Quadrupol%20Schema%20xyz.jpg Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet
5. Critical criteria Case study 2 – NiTiQuadrupole magnet