1 / 13

Hans Peter L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers

Postsecondary and K-12 Data Sharing Results from SHEEO’s State of State Postsecondary Data Systems Study (and more). Hans Peter L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers. General Background. Starting assumption: state level data systems Monitor progress Assess effectiveness

uzuri
Download Presentation

Hans Peter L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Postsecondary and K-12 Data SharingResults from SHEEO’s State of State Postsecondary Data Systems Study(and more) Hans Peter L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers

  2. General Background • Starting assumption: state level data systems • Monitor progress • Assess effectiveness • All with ultimate goal of improved student achievement • Examine and describe key characteristics of state postsecondary data systems • Report designed to inform states and enhance policy

  3. Not Apples to Apples State postsecondary SUR data systems may be found within: • state boards of higher education (coordinating and governing boards) • state boards of education • state financial aid agencies/entities • state budget agencies, and • state labor/workforce agencies

  4. Study Included 59 SURs in 45 States 1 SUR 2 SURs 3 SURs 4 SURs

  5. Age of Systems is Wide Ranging

  6. Reasons for Creating SURs 33 33

  7. Types of Data Collected by # of SURs 58 58 54 46 44 45 43 37 37 29 24 17

  8. Existing links to K-12 and Labor K-12 Labor Both

  9. Matching between PS & K-12 • Of those in states with linkages: • Almost half (42%) use both the Social Security Number and a K-12 ID for matching • Almost all (92%) use an ID in conjunction with demographic elements such as name, date of birth, and gender • Just under a third (27%) use SSN as the only ID in conjunction with demographic elements

  10. Barriers to Linking

  11. Visit http://www.sheeo.org/sspds for • Full report • Profiles of each responding agency or entity • Data element tables Wednesday, 3:00 pm, Meeting Room 602

  12. 4 State Pilot Study • Gates funded, WICHE managed • WA, OR, ID, HI • Data from K-12, postsecondary and labor • “Where did they go and what did they do when they got there?” • Issues: • Legal (FERPA, state law, AG-approval) • Technical (share or align data?) • Different starting points and value for different states

  13. Postsecondary Data Advisory Committee K-12 / PSE feedback • Lack of trust and personality conflicts are on-going challenges • Joint activity (e.g. P-20 data systems) can generate good will) • Find opportunities that have shared value for motivated individuals • Demonstrate how data can be used • Identify what you need to (jointly) get to where you need to go • Start small to demonstrate results • Data generated reports can actually challenge trust that has been created during the development process • Trust is built on data integrity and willingness to address other’s needs • Foster the SHEEO/CCSSO relationship in each state • Institutionalize relationships • Lack of resources especially time • Shared interest is critical

More Related