350 likes | 478 Views
Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors. Alan Huffman Center for Materials and Electronic Technologies huffman@rti.org. Outline. Who is RTI? Solder Bump Technology Bumping process Post bump processes Wafers thinning Dicing control Hybridization
E N D
Current and Future Directions in Hybridization for Pixelated Particle Detectors Alan Huffman Center for Materials and Electronic Technologies huffman@rti.org
Outline • Who is RTI? • Solder Bump Technology • Bumping process • Post bump processes • Wafers thinning • Dicing control • Hybridization • Current Programs and Results • CMS • MEDIPIX • Future Technologies for Hybridization • 3D integration technology • Alternative bump materials • Alternatives to sawing
A Crisis of Identity…Who is RTI? • RTI acquired the research groups formerly known as MCNC Research & Development Center in March 2005 • RTI/MCNC has over 15 years experience in the development and implementation of flip chip technology, including the spin off of Unitive Electronics in 1998 (Amkor) • Fine pitch flip chip (<100 µm) has been ongoing since 1997
Important Points of Pixel Devices for Bumping • I/O pitch typically less than 100 µm • High interconnect counts, from a few thousand to over 65,000 • Large readout and sensor chip size (~ 1 cm2 and larger) • Multi-chip modules (MCM) typically needed to create large area sensor arrays • Materials used must withstand high radiation environment • Flux-free assembly processes are a necessity
Fine Pitch Solder Bumping • Formation of fine pitch solder bumps uses essentially the same processes as ‘standard’ pitch flip chip • Tighter control must be maintained over the processes than for typical wafer level packaging (WLP) applications due to smaller geometries • Additional post-wafer bumping processes are sometimes needed (i.e. wafer thinning) which can easily damage small solder bumps
Plate Solder or Wettable Metal Incoming Wafer With I/O Pads Repassivation With BCB Strip Resist Template UBM Deposition Reflow Apply and Define Plating Template Etch Field UBM RTI Fine Pitch Bumping Process Flow
Solder Bumped ROC and Sensor (US-CMS) 25 µm bump base diameter and 25 µm bump height Ni/Au bump bonding pads
Solder Bumped ROC and Sensor (MEDIPIX) 50 µm pitch readout chip with eutectic Sn/Pb bumps 50 µm pitch sensor chip with Ni/Au bump bond pads
Post-Bumping Wafer Thinning • Wafer thinning is done after bumping to prevent excessive handling and processing of thin wafers • A protective layer is applied to the wafer to protect the bumps during the taping, thinning, and de-taping processes • Wafer thinning process consists of two steps • Grind: to quickly remove Si from the wafer backside • Stress relief: to remove the damaged Si layer and alleviate the stress created in the silicon during the grind • Protective layer is removed prior to dicing
Dicing Considerations • Thinned ROC wafers are more susceptible to damage during dicing and require different blades and parameters • Dicing kerf must be very close to the active area (50 µm or less) on ROCs to allow close placement in multi-chip module assembly • Thin, high resistivity silicon sensors are susceptible to chipping and microcracking during dicing, which increases the leakage current
Assembly Processes • Flip chip assembly of fine pitch bumped devices requires high placement accuracy bonder • Assembly of multi-chip module detectors have ROCs in very close proximity (~150 µm); process must not disturb previously placed die • Use of flux for reflow is undesirable due to difficulty removing flux residue under large chips
Standard Vs. Fine-Pitch Assembly 50um Pitch 250um Pitch • Chip-to-substrate gap reduces from 65µm to 22µm for 25µm diameter bumps
Replaces flux in assembly process Solder-bearing parts treated prior to assembly Short (10-15 min) treatment time Leaves no residues on chip or substrate Plasma Assisted Dry Soldering (PADS) • Proven applications in SMT, MEMS, photonics, and standard flip chip packaging and assembly processes
CMS Detector Modules • Readout chips are fabricated on full thickness 8-inch silicon wafers and are thinned to 200 µm prior to assembly, 4160 bumps per chip • Sensor wafers are fabricated on thin, high resistivity wafers • Bump size is 25 micron base diameter with a minimum I/O pitch of 50 microns • 6 different module sizes: 1x1, 1x2, 1x5, 2x3, 2x4, 2x5 • Full detector will require over 800 total modules with about 5000 individual readout chips • Total number of bumped connections is over 20,000,000
Pixilated Detector Module Assemblies 2x4 detector module in test fixture Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration
Yield Data • Recent evaluation of CMS detector modules (1x1, 1x2, 1x5, 2x3, 2x4, 2x5 arrays, 76 total modules) • 1134 bad bump connections out of about 2,000,000 • Bump bonding yield of 99.94% • Leakage current measurements previously completed on 61 modules • 60 of 61 modules meet leakage current specifications at 250V • 59 of 61 modules meet leakage current specifications at 600V • Power consumption on all modules within spec Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration
Yield Data Sensor Wafer 029 Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration
Yield Data Courtesy: US-CMS FPix Collaboration
MEDIPIX Consortium - CERN • X-ray/gamma ray detector devices working in single photon counting mode • 55 µm pitch, uniform in both directions • Detector modules of 1x1 (~1 in2) and 2x2 (~4 in2) • MEDIPIX ASIC is used in conjunction with different sensor devices for a number of applications • X-ray imaging • Biological radiography • Neutron detection
Pixilated Detector Module Assemblies MEDIPIX 2x2 detector array
MEDIPIX2 Images Courtesy: MEDIPIX Collaboration
MEDIPIX2 Images Courtesy: MEDIPIX Collaboration
Future Hybridization Technologies • 3D Integration • Alternative Bump Materials • Alternative Singulation Processes
3D Integration • Through via interconnects (TVI) are formed through bulk silicon in active devices • Allows multiple device layers to be interconnected front-to-back • TVIs can be formed before or after devices are physically joined together • Significant process differences between vias first process and vias last process • Process used dictated by device design and process compatibility • Allows array sizes not limited to 1xN or 2xN modules: true area array ROC placement
Benefits of 3D Integration: Pixelated Devices • 3-D Integration allows massively parallel signal processing • Dramatically increased electronic functionality in each pixel Detector/Sensor Arrays Actuator Arrays Spatial light modulators w/digital control of optical wave front phases Mirror MEMS Actuator 3-D Interconnects 3-D Interconnects DARPA Coherent Communications, Imaging & Targeting (CCIT) program 3-D ROIC • 3-D Sensor Arrays • Large formats with high resolution • On-chip signal processing • Reduction of size, weight & power • 3-D Actuator Arrays • Large formats with high resolution • Low switching energy & latency • Reduction of size, weight & power
Test Structure Operability Test 65,536 interconnects in ~1 cm2 Si IC 25 mm 256x256 ROIC 20 mm Operability Map Insulator Copper 14 Defective pixels Si IC Nonfunctional cell Demonstrated 99.98% operability in 256x256 arrays with 4 mm vias on 30 mm pitch
Imaging Demonstration FPA cross section Thermal image Demonstrated image from 256x256 MWIR FPA built on 2-layer stack with 4 mmdiameter3-D interconnects (one per cell)
Alternative Bump Materials • Non-collapsible bump materials may be useful for extremely small bump interconnections (~5 µm dia.) Sn-capped Cu bumps
Alternatives to Saw Dicing • Silicon etching using Bosch process allows damage-free singulation of ROCs and sensor devices • Dicing streets must be free of metal Deposit and pattern photoresist Bosch etching complete Photoresist removal Bosch etching
Conclusion • RTI has developed a number of technologies to enable the successful bumping and hybridization of pixel devices • Currently applying these technologies to CMS and MEDIPIX projects for detector manufacture • New technologies under development will someday enable smaller pixel sizes in larger arrays with more functionality