380 likes | 565 Views
February 9, 2005. Who’s here? JFK in Nashville in 1963 Representation Readings Congress as an institution for Representation Mayhew Fenno Poole/Rosenthal. What is Representation?. District-Based Conception. Yes. No. Policy/Issue. Collective. High. Policy Content.
E N D
February 9, 2005 • Who’s here? • JFK in Nashville in 1963 • Representation Readings • Congress as an institution for Representation • Mayhew • Fenno • Poole/Rosenthal
District-Based Conception Yes No Policy/Issue Collective High Policy Content Service/Allocational Symbolic/Descriptive Low Conceptions of Representation
Policy/Issues • Style • Delegate: follow the mandate of constituents • Trustee: exercise independent judgment • “Politico”: switches roles or may engage be a delegate and trustee at same time • Focus • The constituency that is being represented
Policy/Issue Studies • Wahlke et al (1952): divide members into trustee, delegate, and “politico” • Miller & Stokes (1958): attempt to link constituent opinions to legislator’s behavior • Social Welfare: Vote by Party • Civil Rights: Delegate Role • Foreign Affairs: Deference to Executive • Fenno (1977): “home style”; members convince constituents that they represent them regardless of the extent of agreement
Policy/Issue Studies Continued • Browne (1995): constituents influence vote on agricultural legislation • Hall (1987, 1996): district influences legislator membership on committees
Concentric Constituencies • Geographic • Reelection • Primary • Personal
Geographical Constituency • “The District” • Physical: specified by boundaries • Internal Demographic and Political Variables: socioeconomic status, ethnicity, ideology, partisanship, religion, diversity, etc. • Heterogeneity v. Homogeneity: variable that seems to determine members’ perceptions of their districts
Reelection Constituency • “The Supporters” • Who she thinks will vote for her • Reference points in determining reelection constituency • Cross-Sectional • Longitudinal • Partisans, Cross-Party, Least-Likely • “Last Time” v. “This Time” • Challenger has greatest potential for altering the size and composition of reelection constituency • Issues can alter reelection constituency
Primary Constituency • “The Strongest Supporters” • Weak supporters: follow routines (straight party) or are temporary (waiting for alternative) • Strong supporters: more political activity, will not support any challenger • Difficult to delineate primary constituency in some cases, members who recently emerged from a primary election can determine their primary constituency
Personal Constituency • “The Intimates” • Few individuals: closest advisors and confidants, sometimes a spouse (“Kitchen Cabinet”) • Usually the people who have been by an official since their first race • Thought of as “friends”
Proximate Goal • Reelection • Universal • Cannot achieve other goals if member is not reelected • “All members of Congress have a primary interest in getting re-elected. Some members have no other interest.”
Activities Useful for Reelection • Advertising • visiting constituency, non-political speeches to home audiences, letters of condolence and congratulation, newsletters, opinion editorials • Franking Privilege
Activities Useful for Reelection • Credit Claiming: generating belief that the legislator is personally responsible for a government change • Particularized Benefits • Given to specific individual or group that allows the single legislator to be recognized • Done in an ad hoc fashion
Activities Useful for Reelection • Position-taking: “public enunciation of a judgmental statement on anything likely to be of interest to political actors” • roll call vote, floor addresses, speeches, television appearances, letters, press releases, interviews, etc.
Institution Meets Electoral Needs • Benefits Associated with the Office • Staff, casework capabilities, franking privilege • Seniority • Committee Structure • Platform for position-taking, particularized benefits, allows division of labor among members • Parties • Majority party could cut off particularized benefits from minority party, but this has not happened
Basic Goals of a Legislator 1. Reelection 2. Influence within the House 3. Good Public Policy X. (career beyond house, private gain) • Committee membership reflects the goal of a legislators
Appropriations, Ways & Means • “Power,” “Prestige,” “Importance” • Reflects desire to have influence within the House
Interior, Post Office • “District Interests,” “Projects,” “Political Help” • Reflects goal of reelection by helping constituents
Education, Labor, Foreign Affairs • “Interesting,” “Exciting,” “Controversial,” “Important” • Reflects goal of making good public policy
LIBERAL CONSERVATIVE Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call VotingKeith T. Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al
Motivation of Legislator • Ideology • Liberal to Conservative Spectrum • Constraint Hypothesis: issues tend to be mapped onto a fixed ordering or placement of legislators • Voting tends to be highly consistent over a member’s time in office. • History: http://www.voteview.com/h461051.htm
Service/Allocational • Obtaining projects that help the district (“pork) or interceding in the bureacracy (“cutting through red tape) • Motives • Sense of duty • Grateful constituents = Reelection • Studies on impact of pork for reelection mixed • Issues: necessary for constituents to have help?, votes for district at expense of nation?
Symbolic/Descriptive • Legislator as “symbol” that represents public • Representation may extend beyond geographic boundaries of the district • Individual Examples: female legislator as advocate for women nationally, minority legislator as advocate for minorities nationally • Group Example: legislative caucuses
Collective • Represent constituents with a more collective view • political parties • Congress as representative of the nation as a whole • May lead to conflict with district constituents
The Great Divide • Trustee Representation (Burkean) • Delegate Representation
Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process Walter J. Oleszek
The Constitutional Context • Limited Government • Separation of Powers • Checks and Balances • Federalism
Functions of Rules and Procedures • Stability (and predictability) • Legitimacy • Division of Labor • Protection of Minority Rights • Conflict Resolution • Distribution of Power
Rules and Policy Making in Congress • Procedure and Policy Procedures affect outcomes. Procedural moves express policy decisions. The nature of policy determines the use of procedure. Procedural expertise helps members impact policy. • Conventional versus Unconventional Lawmaking “I’m just a bill…” • Precedents and Folkways Precedents: “…the accumulated past decisions on matters of procedure…” Folkways: “…unwritten norms of behavior that members are expected to observe.”
Congressional Decision Making •Decentralized Power Structure Political and structural realities More than 200 committees and subcommittees Parties can provide cohesion. • Multiple Decision Points • Bargaining and Coalition Building Logrolling Compromise Nonlegislative Favors • The Congressional Cycle Two-Year Deadline
House versus Senate • The Big Three Size of Body Size of District Length of Term • Complexity of Rules
House versus Senate continued • Policy Incubation • Specialists versus Generalists • Distribution of Power More even in Senate • Similarities Equal power Lawmaking, oversight and representation Heavy workloads Decentralized committee and party structures Dependence on staff
Pressures on Members • President & Executive Branch • The Fourth Estate • Constituent Pressures • Washington Lobbyists
Credits • Adrian Rodriguez & Alex Theodoridis • Presentation based on: Weisberg, Herbert F., Eric S. Heberlig and Lisa M. Campoli, Classics in Congressional Politics “What is Representation?”, Weisberg et al eds. (Glenview: Longman 1999) pp. 68-82. • Image on Cover from: The Architect of the Capitol http://www.aoc.gov/cc/capitol/c_wf_1.cfm Concepts of Representation slide based on: Table 5.1 in Weisberg et al, p. 74. • Presentation based on: Fenno, Jr., Richard F., Home Style: House Members in their Districts (Glenview: Little, Brown & Company 1978), “Perceptions of the Constituency”, pp. 1-30. • Image on Cover from: US Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/images/water_home.jpg