230 likes | 370 Views
Science Leadership Network. January 23, 2013. Outcomes. Participants will collaborate on plans for implementation of the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science. Participants will collaborate on plans for exploring implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards.
E N D
Science Leadership Network January 23, 2013
Outcomes • Participants will collaborate on plans for implementation of the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science. • Participants will collaborate on plans for exploring implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards. • Participants will form work groups that will build products to be shared across the network.
Agenda • Introductions • Group goals • CCSS experience • Workgroup conversation • Science versus engineering? • Planning for the future
Introductions • Who are we? • What would you like to get our of your participation in this network? • Personal gains? • Products that you could share in your building/district? • Share • Norms
Apples • Describe your apple • What do you think each part is for? • Other models • Put a check mark if the observation no longer applies.
Apples • Arguing from evidence • Article: • Read the text • What technology is used to bring the apple from the tree to the table? • What is your evidence? • Standards? • CCSS Anchor Standards • Practices • Cross-cutting concepts
CCSS • Now: Beginning implementation, pilot of SBAC items • 2013-2014: Continued implementation, field test of SBAC • 2014-2015: Full implementation, operational assessment
CCSS and Science? • CCSS-ELA Literacy in Science • Math practices • Alignment to NGSS
CCSS and Science? • What is your implementation plan for CCSS-Literacy in Science? • What have you done already? • What are you planning on doing? • What resources could this group help provide?
NGSS • Final draft in March • Adoption this spring? • Assessment in 2016-2017 (earliest) • WA State plan will be developed in March • Framework PD • Alignment of practice • Alignment of materials
Workgroups? • RSC Network • Products • Group up • Highest priorities • Products
THE BOX & T-CHART Similarities Differences Pencil Marker Betsy Rupp Fulwiler
You need to get across the river! • Criteria: • Must be able to get across the river without additional forces added • Constraints: • Limited materials • 2 index cards, 2 plastic cups, duct tape, 3 washers, 2 wooden skewers, 4 straws, 5 rubber bands, 2 paper clips, 2 sheets of waxed paper. • Limited time (30 minutes) • May only be powered by a rubber band • Record your design and think about when and how you use science, math, and technology.
Take Another Look at the Box & T Diagram Is there anything you wish to add or revise about the work of scientists and engineers?
Article • What science or engineering practices did you use when building your device? • How will the practices play out in your classroom or instructional role? • What questions might you have?
NGSS and you • What might your implementation plan for NGSS look like? • What have you done already? • What are you planning on doing? • What resources could this group help provide?
Future • Workgroup time • What might be your action plan? • Short term product? (this year…) • Webinars? • What would you like to know about? • Next meeting
Gots and Needs Index card: What did you get out of today- what worked well for you? What do you need- what would you like to see different from next time?