1 / 18

SIMSAT 3.0 a platform independent version of ESOC s simulation infrastructure

Presentation Overview. Project SummaryProject description, its participants

van
Download Presentation

SIMSAT 3.0 a platform independent version of ESOC s simulation infrastructure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. SIMSAT 3.0 – a platform independent version of ESOC’s simulation infrastructure

    2. Presentation Overview Project Summary Project description, its participants & working practices Architectural Overview Differences to SIMSAT 2.0 Description of the main architectural differences Platform Independence How and why are we platform independent? Project Status How things are, how they look, and road-map Summary

    3. Project Summary – Products Project requires moving SIMSAT 2.0, Generic Models 2.0 and Ground Models 2.0 to Linux, based on open standards SIMSAT 2.0 Kernel: Run-time engine for the simulation MMI: Default method of controlling and interacting with the simulation Generic Models SIMPACK, SENSE, PEM and SimDyn Ground GMM, MCS DIF, TTC Streams, GVS

    4. Project Summary – Work Breakdown VEGA is prime contractor with SciSys, DataSpazio and Terma subcontractors Work share principles... Each company takes responsibility for one of the main products Each company has work packages on each product Each company responsible for their own code up to provisional acceptance After provisional acceptance, company responsible for product must fix all problems with that product

    5. Project Summary – Working Practices “Component Monitoring” to allow responsible companies to monitor components produced by other companies “Hot desks” in the VEGA offices for the use of sub-contractors to empower easier integration Off-site access to the source code to empower rapid problem fixing using CVS repository and a SSH link Web sites to empower better teamwork Project Portal with discussion groups and documents JIRA Issue tracking

    6. Architectural Overview

    7. Pluggable Components SIMSAT 2.0 supports components in the Kernel only E.g. TTC Streams and concurrent scheduler But MMI is statically compiled “Impossible” for third parties to alter or improve the MMI SIMSAT 3.0 will use components for the Kernel and MMI Third party code needs to meet interface requirements CORBA interfaces for Kernel, Java interfaces for MMI Component can be loaded into Kernel or MMI at run time Component need not be delivered with SIMSAT

    8. Pluggable Components – Benefits Easy for third parties to add items - Just ‘follow the interface rules’ (and semantics) Kernel and MMI can be augmented with new components to replace or enhance the functionality of the existing ones, e.g. A new logger that uses databases? A component to record and replay data values? Mimic diagrams of the simulated systems? Simulator specific control panels? System is more expandable System is more maintainable New features do not have to complicate existing components that are “tried and trusted”

    9. Kernel Services Kernel Services have been refined Kernel Services now on the same footing as models Allows kernel to be much more dynamic No compulsory components Kernel Services can be scripted Allows users to configure the kernel at run time

    10. Kernel Services - Benefits Kernel is no longer a closed box Need three loggers? Don’t need a scheduler? Simulation developers can use “debug” versions of components to help solve problems Schedulers that automatically performance profile the simulation Different types of components for different tasks

    11. Java MMI SIMSAT 3.0 MMI has been redesigned from scratch SIMSAT 2.0 MMI is implemented using MFC C++ classes Java Swing now used as the API MMI now scriptable MMI now utilises components Allows easy plug in of third party graphical objects Currently using Sun’s JVM, version 1.4.2

    12. Java MMI - Benefits Java is much easier to write and maintain than C++ Automatically supports multiple platforms Better developer knowledge for Java GUIs than MFC Extensive Java libraries as part of the standard language XML CORBA

    13. CORBA SIMSAT 2.0 uses COM as the middleware CORBA has replaced COM for SIMSAT 3.0 COM IDL definitions of the Kernel interfaces were “ported” to CORBA IDL Conversion Refactoring Much lower coupling and higher cohesion of interfaces But many more interfaces Need to replace some operating system features We use omniORB 4.0.3 at present

    14. CORBA - Benefits CORBA is an open standard Many open source implementations Many different platforms CORBA is used for the Mission Control System middleware as well

    15. Rhino SIMSAT 2.0 used the Microsoft script engines Provides access to the simulation objects from JScript Provides debugging facility Rhino is an open source script engine written in Java, with CORBA connectivity packages “LiveConnect” used for communication with Java objects “JSCorba” used for connecting JavaScript to CORBA objects “Rhino Debugger” for debugging scripts

    16. Rhino - Benefits We still control the models through JavaScript (JSCorba) We can still debug the scripts (Rhino Debugger) We can also control the MMI Automated system tests for Kernel and MMI

    17. Platform Independence Middleware is CORBA Available in “compatible” stable formats on virtually every platform Operating System independence Use of library to isolate platform dependencies Use of third party software to achieve easy portability of this library, e.g. ACE, APR or omniThreads MMI is Java based Available on all modern platforms Use of XML where possible

    18. Project Status Basic versions of critical system components are complete First integration of Kernel and MMI systems now underway Will result in ‘proof of concepts’ Second phase of project is planned to be ‘filling the gaps’ Current Delivery Dates Internal Engineering Drop Delivery due early next month SIMSAT 3.0 due early November 2004 Generic Models 3.0 and Ground 3.0 due early 2005

    19. A Systems Engineering Company

More Related