1 / 20

Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Resource for Researchers

Explore the grant-funded Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems that help manage, analyze, and report individual student data. Obtain insights into successful programs and support informed decision-making at all education levels. Learn about the goals, grantees, and student-level data collected. Discover opportunities for accessing data, state collaboration, and future developments.

vanessalee
Download Presentation

Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Resource for Researchers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statewide Longitudinal Data SystemsResource for Researchers Tate Gould, NCES

  2. Authorized in 2002 by the Education Sciences Reform Act and the Educational Technical Assistance Act The grants are cooperative agreements – a form of grant in which the federal government has a more active involvement than in typical grants. 3 to 5 year awards of $1.5 to $9 million per State November 2005: 14 SEAs awarded over $52 million June 2007: 13 SEAs awarded over $62 million April 2009: 27 SEAs awarded over $150 million Legislative Background

  3. The purpose of this program is to provide grants to SEAs to enable such agencies to design, develop, and implement statewide longitudinal data systems to efficiently and accurately manage, analyze, disaggregate, report, and use individual student data. The long term goals of this program are to: identify successful instructional programs, facilitate use of research to improve instruction determine whether graduates have knowledge and skills to succeed in postsecondary education and the workforce simplify the processes used by state education agencies to make educational data transparent through local, state, and federal reporting support informed decision-making at all levels of the education system permit the generation and use of accurate and timely data. Goals of the Program

  4. Grantee States 2006 Alaska Arkansas California Connecticut Florida Kentucky Maryland Michigan Minnesota Pennsylvania Ohio South Carolina Tennessee Wisconsin • 2007 • Arizona • Colorado • District of Columbia • Indiana • Kansas • Maine • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • North Carolina • Oregon • Utah • Virginia • 2009 • Arkansas • California • Connecticut • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • New York • North Dakota • Ohio • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • Texas • Washington • Wisconsin

  5. Grantee States

  6. Grantee Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems are additionally collecting the following Student-Level Data: • Local and State Assessments • National College Readiness Assessments (for SAT, ACT, AP Scores, etc.) • Classroom Grades for K-12 • Course Enrollment and Completion • Attendance (Daily or Received on a Daily Basis) • Discipline • Enrollment • Homeless • Migrant • NGA Graduation/Drop Out • Special Education – IEP Data • Statewide Unique Student Identifiers • Student-Teacher Link • Students Not Tested and Rationale

  7. FY06, FY07, and FY09 SLDS Grantee States Access to Student-Level Data (n=42) • Business Intelligence Tools for Schools/Teachers • LEA District Staff • Parent • Publicly Accessible Policy on Data Access for Researchers • Published Policy on Data Use • Publicly Accessible School/Grade-Level Achievement Growth Model Data (based on individual student growth measures)

  8. Examples of SLDS Sharing with Research Community • Arkansas • Utah • Rhode Island • Louisiana

  9. FERPA – data access for organizations State procurement issues – often takes longer than originally planned SEAs as facilitating organization – new role for state collaboration Sustainability at the state level – impact of state economy Issues Identified through the Program

  10. Next Steps for SLDS Building data structures for seamless transfers of student records across state lines Allowing for effective e-Transcripts and reliable connections to post-secondary and labor data Providing data access to research community and public stakeholders

  11. Appendix Slides

  12. Questions?

More Related