100 likes | 239 Views
CD2 Documentation Preparations. Responses to review recommendations (May 2006 partial draft, July 2007 document not started) TDR (in progress, see later in presentation) Other documents (PEP, PMP, VMP, RMP, CMP, PSAD) All have drafts except PSAD (which builds on PHA)
E N D
CD2 Documentation Preparations • Responses to review recommendations (May 2006 partial draft, July 2007 document not started) • TDR (in progress, see later in presentation) • Other documents (PEP, PMP, VMP, RMP, CMP, PSAD)All have drafts except PSAD (which builds on PHA) • MOUs (in progress; tasklists done, some have previous drafts, new UIUC draft in circulation) • Baseline Schedule (expect L2 changes complete by August 1)
DECam TDR Schedule • Counting Backwards:Review November 15Submit TDR November 1Collab Review October 17Editorial Work October 10 • July 11 – October 10 : 13 Weeks
TDR Delivery Schedule • Section I (Wyatt) • Draft Outline July 20 done • First Draft Text Complete Aug 3 in progress • Final Text Complete Aug 17 • Section II Chapters (L2 Managers) • Outlines and Overview Paragraphs July 31 in progress • Text 50% Complete Aug 24 • First Draft Complete Sep 14 • Final Draft Complete Oct 7 • Section III Chapters (Wyatt and Brenna) • Draft Chapter List and Outlines Jul 20 done • Text 50% Complete Aug 24 in progress • First Draft Complete Oct 3 • Final Draft Complete Oct 10 • V0.1 of TDR in DocDB – Draft outline (not fleshed out in Section II) + placeholder text from CDR
TDR TOC • Foreword • Section I. Introduction and Management Structure • 1The Science Context of the Dark Energy Survey • 2Overview of the Dark Energy Survey • 3The Dark Energy Survey Organization • 3.1Dark Energy Survey Projects • 3.2Dark Energy Survey Collaboration • 4Site Selection • 4.1Properties of the CTIO site and the Blanco Telescope • 5The DES Observing Plan • 5.1Improvements Planned for the Blanco Telescope and the DECam Instrument • 5.2Data Management for the Dark Energy Survey • 5.3The CTIO Facilities Improvement Project
TDR TOC cont’d • Section II. Technical Description of the DECam Project • 1Work Breakdown Structure for the DECam Project • 2The Design of the Dark Energy Camera • 3WBS 1.2 Focal Plane Detectors • 3.1CCD Characterization • 4WBS 1.3 Front End Electronics • 5WBS 1.4 Optics • 5.1Optical Corrector • 6WBS 1.5 OptoMechanical Systems • 6.1Prime Focus Cage and Alignment • 7WBS 1.6 Survey Image System Process Integration (SISPI) • 8WBS 1.7 Simulation and Survey Planning • 9WBS 1.8 CTIO Integration with DECam
TDR TOC cont’d • Section III. Management for Cost and Schedule • 1DECam Funding Mechanisms • 1.1In-Kind Contributions to the DECam Project • 1.2Project Deliverables • 2Value Engineering for the DECam Project • 2.1Choice of CCDs • 2.2Optical Design Choices • 2.3CCD Readout Electronics • 3Risk Management for the DECam Project • 3.1Risks in the Optical Manufacture • 3.1.1Incorrect figuring • 3.1.2Lens damage • 3.1.3Material inhomogeneity • 3.1.4Schedule
TDR TOC cont’d • 3.2Risks in the CCD Manufacture • 3.2.1Risks associated with processing at the foundry • 3.2.2Risks associated with processing at LBNL • 3.2.3Risks associated with packaging and characterization • 3.2.4Schedule and Cost • 4Cost and Schedule for the DECam Project • 4.1The Proposed Baseline Cost and Schedule of the DECam Project • 5Managing the Project Responsibly • 5.1Environment, Safety, and Health • 5.1.1The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • 5.1.2Safety Assessment Documents • 5.1.3Integrated Safety Management Plan • 5.1.4Waste Minimization/Pollution Identification • 5.2Quality Assurance Program • 5.3Safeguards and Securities Plan and Vulnerability Assessment • 5.4Preliminary Plan for Demobilization of Replaced Facilities • 5.5Preliminary Plan for Decontamination and Decommissioning • 5.6Preliminary Project Execution Plan
TDR TOC cont’d • 6Preliminary Management Control Documents • 6.1Memoranda of Understanding • 6.2Preliminary Project Management Plan • 7Public and Stakeholder Input • 7.1Stakeholders in the DECam Project • 7.2Community Use of DECam and Access to Data Obtained with DECam • 8Project Reviews • 8.1Technical Reviews • 8.2ES&H Reviews • 8.3Director’s Reviews • Appendix: Acronyms Used in This Document • References
RSDs • Requirement and Specification Documents – linchpin of Configuration Management plan • Template complete (Jean Slaughter) • First example complete – Barrel RSD (Andy Stefanik) • Two of the text sections from the RSDs are copied into the TDR, and for many subsystems will be all that is needed for the TDR. • Barrel TDR subchapter has been created from Barrel TDR (Andy Stefanik)