1 / 13

February 24 – February 28, 2013 ♦ Phoenix , Arizona

Collaboration in Long-Term Stewardship at DOE’s Hanford Site - Abstract # 13019 * Rick Moren, PG, *David Brown, **Ella Fiest , ***Keith Grindstaff, PMP, *** Jamie Zeisloft *Mission Support Alliance, LLC, Richland, WA **Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Richland WA

vanig
Download Presentation

February 24 – February 28, 2013 ♦ Phoenix , Arizona

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collaboration in Long-Term Stewardship at DOE’s Hanford Site - • Abstract # 13019 • *Rick Moren, PG, *David Brown, **Ella Fiest, ***Keith Grindstaff, PMP, • ***Jamie Zeisloft • *Mission Support Alliance, LLC, Richland, WA • **Washington Closure Hanford, LLC, Richland WA • ***US Department of Energy, Richland Operations, Richland WA February 24 – February 28, 2013 ♦ Phoenix, Arizona Session #110

  2. Background/History • Hanford Site • 1943-1987 Pu Production • 1989 Placed on NPL • 1998 Initial discussions of LTS • 2010 DOE/RL LTS Program • 2011 First land to LTS • 2013 First reactor to LTS

  3. LTS Today • 3 DOE Programs • 3 Contractors • 3 Periods of Performance • 3 Incentives

  4. Contractors • Mission Support Alliance (MSA) LLC (Services) • Washington Closure Hanford (WCH) (River Corridor Closure) • CH2MHill Plateau Remediation Company (PRC) (Central Plateau Cleanup)

  5. Hanford’s LTS Program

  6. Collaboration Elements • Integrated Project Team • DOE SMEs Technical and Contracts • Contractor SMEs • Meet Bi-weekly • Bias toward action – personal accountability • Builds relationships and working trust • Issues solved at lowest appropriate level • Collaborative innovation • Risk management

  7. Collaboration • Transition package prepared by all three contractors • Differing performance incentives/contract • Change from one transition to 14 transitions w/o significant REA • Allowed more efficient transition • New discovery process tested in first transition

  8. Transition Schedule YEAR # 2011 1 2012 2 2013 2 2014 4 2015 5 14 • Schedule is accelerating into 2015 • New ideas to speed the process • ISS reactor transition • Combine parcels

  9. LTS Progress 3 transitions 98 mi2to date 1 cocooned reactor in 2013 >149 Waste Sites Institutional Controls Vegetation Monitoring Remedy Assessments

  10. ISS Reactor Transition • Transition 5 cocooned reactors in 2013 • 2 years early • Reschedule S&M activities • cost savings and efficiency 105-DR, 105-D 2015 105-C 2014 105-H 2015 105-N 2015

  11. Benefits of Collaboration • High performing team • Multiple transitions promotes efficient closeout for WCH and DOE • Closure documentation on a manageable scale • MSA directly supports cleanup mission and RL site vision

  12. Conclusions • Collaboration is essential for effective progress • Transparency and open communication drive collaboration • Strong team relationships and individual accountability result in long term progress • Strong DOE leadership

  13. QUESTIONS?

More Related