140 likes | 323 Views
Ordinance Amendment: Schools Adequate Public Facilities (APF) Ordinance. Schools APF Ordinance. Adopted July 1999 Intent Link Provision Of School Capital Improvements With Future Development To Ensure Adequate Public Facilities In Conjunction With New Development
E N D
Ordinance Amendment: Schools Adequate Public Facilities (APF) Ordinance ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Adopted July 1999 • Intent Link Provision Of School Capital Improvements With Future Development To Ensure Adequate Public Facilities In Conjunction With New Development • Applies Only At Site Plan/Subdivision Plan Stage • General Schools Impact Also Identified During Rezonings ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Based On MOU With Wake County Board Of Education • Requires Wake County School System To Issue A Certificate Of Adequate Educational Facilities (CAEF) • Ordinance Officially Amended In 2003 • Allow Advance Donation Of Schools Or Sites, Or Payment Of Funds, For Large Projects To Meet Future APF Requirements • Case-by-case consideration • Incorporated Into Zoning Conditions Or Developer Agreement ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Some Developments Exempt: • Low-density Subdivisions • Affordable Housing Projects That Use Public Subsidies Or Other Arrangements To Ensure Affordability • Amendments To Approved Plans That Do Not Increase The Number Of Units By More Than 5% ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • LOS Standards (“Overcrowding Level”) Established: • First 3 Years: • 148% For Elementary Schools • 132% For Middle Schools • 141% For High Schools • Since July 2002, No INDIVIDUAL School Can Exceed 130% Of Its Permanent Seat Capacity ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • >25 Subdivision Plans + >12 Apartment/Townhome Projects “Tested” Over The Past Few Years • >1100 Lots And 900 MF Units Since 1999 • All Have Received CAEF • School System Continues To Reduce Overcrowding Through Capital Program… ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools Overcrowding - Area CBy Level, 1997 vs. 2003 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools Overcrowding - Area CBy Individual School, 2003 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Limited Applicability Due To Numerous Other Town Initiatives Difficult To Assess Outcomes • Limits Due To Water Supply • Roads APF Ordinance • Increased Development Fees Enacted • Residential Annexations Limited • General Economic Slowdown And Decrease In Residential Development ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Conclusions: • Reduction In Growth Rate Cannot Be Directly Attributed To Ordinance • Still Questionable Whether Town Can Regulate Local Development Vis-à-vis School Capacity Not Capital Provider • School System Has A Responsibility To Serve Students • Ability To Shift Students Makes Schools Adequacy A “Moving Target” ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Conclusions: • Complexity of school system also makes adequacy assessment a “moving target” • Public given false impression that ordinance actually makes a difference • Administration of ordinance an added burden for no benefit • Overcrowding being addressed “naturally” as WCPSS continues to implement capital programs ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Staff Recommendation: • Eliminate Schools APF from the Land Development Ordinance • Section 3.18 & related provisions • Add repeal language to explicitly state that fee imposed by prior PDD condition or separate developer’s agreement still applicable unless amended in future • Continue to provide development data to school system ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Schools APF Ordinance • Staff Recommendation: • Maintain & strengthen planning coordination for schools • Continue to assist with provision of school facilities via Town expenditures for land and/or roads & utilities in keeping with Council policy ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY
Ordinance Amendment: Schools Adequate Public Facilities (APF) Ordinance ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________TOWN Of CARY