1 / 36

Contracts and Sale of Goods

Contracts and Sale of Goods.

vaughan-dunn
Download Presentation

Contracts and Sale of Goods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Contracts and Sale of Goods

  2. Harris v. Time. Three year old boy received an offer as follows: “Joshua Gnaizda, I’ll give you this versatile new calculator watch free just for opening this envelope.” On the inside – hidden by the envelope it said – “And mailing this Certificate today” requiring him to buy Fortune Magazine. • False Advertising • Unilateral Contract? • Promissory Estoppel? Contracts - Promise • Benefits Society to Enforce Promises • Common law v. UCC • Contract Law is based on state law • Bi-lateral v. Unilateral Contracts Contract Defined An agreement that can be enforced in court, formed by two or more parties who agree to perform or to refrain from performing some act now or in the future.

  3. §1: The Uniform Commercial Code • Contracts Across State Lines • How UCC works among states • Benefits of UCC • All states adopted except Louisiana • UCC Article 2: Sale of Goods. • Modifies common law of contracts of some areas. • UCC 2 preempts common law. • Where UCC 2 is silent, common law governs

  4. Re: Plantation Shutter Co. v. Ezell, p. 317, Case Presentation Special interior shutters for his home. Free installation §2: The Scope of Article 2 • Sale of Goods. Article 2 applies to the “sale of goods.” • “Sale.” A “sale” is the passing of title of “goods” to/from a “merchant” (seller or buyer) for a price (money, goods, services, etc). • Good v. Service • Lohman v. Wagner (2004). Pig “farrow to finish” program. Does UCC apply? Service of raising pigs or sale of goods? Mixed purpose contracts – look for predominant purpose – sale of goods or service – that controls. • “Merchant.” A “merchant” has special business expertise and is not a casual buyer/seller. • Real Estate. UCC does not apply, unless can be severed (e.g. trees). • Services. Generally contracts for services are not governed by UCC2.

  5. §1: Good Faith Requirement • Good Faith is the foundation of every UCC commercial contract. • Good faith means honesty in fact. • Generally judging state-of-mind • Merchants are held to a higher standard of care than non-merchants. • Observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade. Exxon Case Exxon stations argued the Exxon violated good faith under UCC by charging stations more than they could get gas from “jobbers.” Exxon argued that it met good faith by charging a commercially reasonable price.

  6. Requirements of a Contract The four requirements that constitute what are known as the elements of a contract are: CONSIDERATION AGREEMENT LEGALITY CAPACITY

  7. Requirements of the Offer Intent There must be a serious, objective intention by the offeror to become bound by the offer. Nonoffer situations include: (a) expressions of opinion; (b) statements of intention; (c) preliminary negotiations; and (d) advertisements, catalogues, and circulars. Definiteness The terms of the offer must be sufficiently definite to be ascertainable by the parties or by a court. Communication The offer must be communicated to the offeree.

  8. Presentation Case: Advertisement as Offer, Leonard v. PepsiCoGroups 19 & 12 Link To Commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdackF2H7Qc

  9. Arbitration ClausesHarris v. BlockbusterCase Illustration 9.3, p. 323 • Harris sued blockbuster because Blockbuster entered into a contract with Facebook that caused Blockbuster customer movie selections to be disseminated on Facebook. • Blockbuster’s online contract had an arbitration clause that Harris agreed to. • Blockbuster also stated: “You agree to review these Terms and Conditions of Use periodically and your continued use of this Site following such modifications will indicate your acceptance of these modified Terms and Conditions….” • Is the arbitration clause/contract valid or is it illusory because Blockbuster can change at any time? • AT&T Case – Nov 9, 2010 • US Supreme Court Case • $30.22 sales tax on “free phone” • Arbitration clause prevents class action lawsuits • Plaintiffs argue the clause is “unconscionable” • Arbitration Clause Details • AT&T must pay a minimum of $7,500 if it loses • AT&T pays all arbitration fees • Supreme Court Ruled April 2011. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion.

  10. Termination of an Offer • Counteroffer • Revocation by offeror • Rejection by the offeree • Lapse of time • Death or incapacity of either party

  11. Noncompetewithout pay raise Consideration • Legally Sufficient • To be legally sufficient, consideration must involve a legal detriment to the promisee, a legal benefit to the promisor, or both. • One incurs a legal detriment by doing something that one had no prior legal duty to do. • UCC. UCC does not require consideration for a contract modification. Common law does.

  12. Contracts Contrary to Statute USURY Occurs when a lender makes a loan at an interest rate above the lawful maximum. The maximum rate of interest varies from state to state. GAMBLING Gambling contracts that contravene (go against) state statutes are deemed illegal and thus void. LICENSING STATUTES Contracts entered into by persons who do not have a license, when one is required by statute, will not be enforceable unless the underlying purpose of the statute is to raise government revenues. SABBATH LAWS Laws prohibiting the formation or the performance of certain contracts on Sunday. Such laws vary widely from state to state, and many states do not enforce them.

  13. Contrary to Public Policy and Quasi Contract • Contrary to Public Policy • Restraint of trade • Covenant not to compete • Unconscionable • Adhesion Contract • Exculpatory Clauses (exclude liability for fraud, intentional injury, or illegal acts) • Quasi Contract - Implied In Law • Quasi Contract • Unjust enrichment Jones v. Star Credit Corp. (1969). $300 freezer for $1,234. Fraud is not present. Excessive price and unequal bargaining positions. Houseboat example, fear factor,

  14. Statute of Frauds - UCC • Sale of goods over $500 must have a signed writing to be enforceable. • Exceptions • Between merchants – if within a reasonable time a writing confirms the contract • Specially manufactured goods. • Admissions by breaching party. • Partial performance (or complete performance – if payment made and goods received). • Merchant doesn’t object within 10 days. • Oral agreement enforceable after written confirmation between merchants. • job for “remainder of his life” End-of-Chapter Q: 1, p. 349 • New company offered 8% commission • Current company said it would offer 10% commission to get employee to stay – plus employment for life (except disability or dishonesty) • Relationship soured and employee fired. • Sued for permanent – job • Was there consideration? • Does Statute of Frauds apply?

  15. Separate Contract Issue - Language Limiting Liability in a Contract Puget Sound Financial LLC v. Unisearch, Inc. (1976). Searched for liens and missed one. Invoice said “liability limited to amount of fee” or $25. Puget used Unisearch and received this notice 47 times. Parol Evidence • No Oral Evidence. Terms of a written agreement intended to be the final expression of parties’ intentions, cannot be contradicted by prior or contemporaneous agreements. • Exceptions to the rule: • Contracts subsequently modified. • Voidable or Void contracts. • Contracts containing ambiguous terms. • Prior dealing, course of performance, or usage of trade. • Contracts subject to orally agreed-on conditions. • Contracts with an obvious or gross clerical error that clearly would not represent the agreement of the parties. • End-of-Chapter Q: 14, p. 352. Williams v. Spitzer Autoworld. • Williams purchased a 2004 GMC Yukon from Spitzer • He was to receive a trade in allowance of $15,500 for his 2003 Ford Explorer • The contract said “This was the entire agreement between the parties” • Williams sued Spitzer stating he and Spitzer had reached a prior oral agreement that he would receive a trade-in allowance of $16,500 – he said he failed to notice the difference.

  16. Presentation Case, Oakley Fertilizer (P) v. Continental Ins. (D) (2009) , page 341 Groups 8 & 1 Oakley Fertilizer v.

  17. Acceptance: Additional Terms UCCelimination of common law “mirror image” rule • Either Non-Merchant. If either party is a non-merchant, the contract is formed according to original terms of the offer. • Both Merchants. If both parties are merchants, contract incorporates new terms unless: • (1) original offer expressly limits terms, or • (2) material change, or • (3) offeror objects within reasonable time. • Material Alternations • Disclaimers or warranties • Arbitration clause • Different Terms. UCC position less clear. Some courts treat as a new term others find contract is formed and use gap-filling provisions. 200 start here thurs

  18. §4: Formation of Sales Contracts Under UCC • Common Law. At common law once a valid offer is unequivocally accepted, a binding contract is formed. • UCC is more flexible, and allows for open pricing, payment, and delivery terms. • Open Price Term: If parties have not agreed on pricing, court can determine “reasonable price at the time of delivery.” UCC2-305. • Open Payment Term: Unless otherwise agreed, payment is due on delivery (COD). UCC2-310(a). • Open Delivery Term: Unless otherwise agreed, buyer takes delivery at the Seller’s place of business. UCC2-308(a). • Open Quantity: generally courts will not impose a quantity. UCC2-306. End-of-Chapter Q: 2, p. 349.

  19. Presentation Case: Discussion Case, Promissory Estoppel, Tour Costa Rica v. Country WalkersGroups 6 & 3

  20. Examples of each

  21. termination of catering job 5 days before picnic • End-of-Chapter Q 6, p. 350 also End-of-Chapter Q: 7 • $7,000 contract for catering • Cancelled 5 days before • Contract required full payment if cancelled • Plaintiff asserts it's an unlawful penalty clause Types of Damages Compensatory Damages Consequential Damages Punitive Damages Nominal Damages Liquidated Damages

  22. Liquidated Damages, • Facts (End-of-Chapter Q: 3) • Ameritech Business Pages – Sells ads to its phonebook • Ameritech failed to place Ad for customer (it made a mistake) • Customer, Trimble, sued for lost business revenue. • Clause in signed contract read: “if publisher should be found liable for loss or damage due to a failure on the part of the publisher or its directory, in any respect…. The liability shall be limited to an amount equal to the contract price for the disputed advertisement, or that sum of money actually paid by the customer toward the disputed advertisements, whichever sum shall be less, as liquidated damages, and not as a penalty…” • Trimble not charged • Issue - Is this enforceable? • Question - What is this clause called?

  23. Mitigation of Damages • When breach of contract occurs, the innocent injured party is held to a duty to reduce the damages that he or she suffered. • Duty owed depends on the nature of the contract. • End-of-Chapter Q 7, p. 350 • Diaz v. Learjet Liquidated Damages Ques • Diaz purchased a Learjet: • He singed a contract with a $250,000 nonrefundable deposit. • Learjet expected to make $1.8 million on the sale • Diaz breached the contract and wanted his $250,000 back • Learjet sold Diaz’s jet for a $1.88 million dollar profit • Learjet was building jets under capacity and could have sold 2 • Should Learjet have to return the deposit?

  24. Specific Performance • Equitable Remedy. An equitable remedy calling for the performance of the act promised in the contract. • Unique Goods. Specific performance is only available in special situations, such as • those involving contracts for the sale of unique goods or land, or • when monetary damages would be an inadequate remedy. • Personal Services. Specific performance is not available as a remedy in breached contracts for personal services.

  25. Special UCC Rules Start here thurs 930

  26. §2: Obligations of the Seller- UCC – Tender of Goods • Tender. Seller has a duty to “tender” delivery of “conforming goods.” Meaning with reasonable notice, at a reasonable hour, In a reasonable manner, Exactly, unless otherwise agreed. • Non- Carrier • Buyer picks up at Seller’s place of business or, if Seller has no place of business, then Seller’s residence. • If both parties know the goods are elsewhere (at a warehouse), then place of delivery is where the goods are. • Carrier • Shipment contracts. Seller has a duty to: • Put goods into hands of independent carrier. • Make contract for transportation. • Obtain and promptly deliver or tender to the Buyer any documents necessary. • Promptly notify Buyer that shipment has been made. • Destination contracts. Seller has duty to: • Tender the goods at a reasonable hour and hold conforming goods at the Buyer’s disposal for a reasonable period of time.

  27. The Perfect Tender Rule UCC • Buyers’ Rights for Sellers Failure of Perfect Tender • Accept the goods; • Reject the entire shipment; or • Accept part and reject part. • Seller has the right to “Cure” if: • Agreed time of performance has not yet expired; or • If Seller had reasonable grounds to expect that Buyer would accept non-conforming goods, i.e., these goods are better than goods ordered, or Buyer has accepted non-conforming goods in the past

  28. §3: Obligations of the Buyer UCC and Right to Inspect • Buyer Obligations. • Receive Goods. • Make Payment. • Right to Inspect. Buyer has right to inspection before paying: • Costs of inspection borne by Buyer. • However, C.O.D. give Buyer no right to inspect.

  29. Buyer Breach: Seller Remedies • Goods in Seller’s Possession • Withhold Goods. Seller may withhold delivery of the goods: • Rescind Contract. Seller may rescind the contract. • Identify Goods. Seller may identify the goods to the contract. • Sell Material. Seller may sell raw materials. • Re-sell the goods • Recover damages • Sue Buyer for breach of contract. • Goods in Transit • Goods are “in transit” when Seller has tendered goods to Carrier. • Seller has the right to stop the goods in transit if: • Buyer is insolvent - Seller can stop entire shipment of goods. • Buyer is in breach - Seller may stop a whole truckload or whole container. • Goods in Buyer’s Possession • Sue for Purchase Price. Seller may sue for the purchase price. • Reclaim Goods. Seller can reclaim goods received by an insolvent Buyer if demand made within 10 days of receipt.

  30. Seller Breach: Buyer RemediesGoods in Seller’s Possession • Buyer Wants Goods • Specific performance or replevin • Recover goods from Seller if Seller becomes insolvent within 10 days after receiving first payment. • Buyer Does Not Want Goods • Rescind contract. • Cover or do not cover and sue for breach of contract.

  31. Risk of Loss for Goods • Title. Sale of goods requires different rules than real property transactions: risk should not always pass with title. • UCC replaces title with • identification, • risk, • and insurable interest.

  32. Risk of Loss in the case of Breach of Contract • Generally breaching party bears ROL. • Seller’s Breach. • Rejection - risk stays with seller. • Revocation of acceptance - risk passes back to seller to the extent that buyer’s insurance does not cover the loss. • Buyer’s Breach. Goods are identified, risk passes to buyer for a reasonable amount of time after seller learns of the breach, to the extent that seller’s insurance does not cover loss.

  33. §4: Insurable Interest • Identification. Buyer has an insurable interest in goods that have been identified. • Title/Security Interest. Seller has an insurable interest in goods as long as they retain title or a security interest. • Both at Same Time. Both buyers and sellers can have an insurable interest at the same time.

  34. Ganno v. Lanoga Corp. (2003). End-of-Chapter Q: 12. Ganno purchased a 12 foot beam and the Building Center put it in his truck without tying it down. It fell out at an intersection and when he picked it up, the other end was struck by a car shattering his knee. Risk of loss passed. §2: When Title Passes • Title can pass: • Upon physical delivery, or • When agreed to by the parties, or • If no agreement, depends on whether contract is shipment or destination contract: • Shipment: title passes at time and place of shipment. ROL passes to Buyer when tendered to carrier • Destination: title passes when goods are tendered at the destination. ROL passes to Buyer when goods tendered at destination. • Delivery Without Movement of Goods Title passes when agreed by the parties, or • With document of title: when and where document delivered. • Without document: when sales contract is made, if goods have been identified or when identification occurs if they have not been identified. • If Seller is a merchant, ROL passes when buyer takes physical possession of goods. Windows Inc. v. Jordan Panel System Corp. (1999). “delivery to New York City” Goods properly packaged but broken during shipping via Consolidated (a carrier). When terms ambiguous a strong presumption exists for a shipping contract. End-of-chapter Q: 12, p. 352

  35. Skip – requirements and options contracts End-of-Chapter Q: 2, p. 249 • Carl Merritt contacted R&P Products about selling RxP Gas Kicker, a fuel additive as a private label product. • The agreement stated the following: • $10 for consideration • R&P agrees to sell RxP Gas Kicker for • $1.25 per 2.5 oz bottle • $1,280 per 55 gallon drum • R&P agrees to guarantee shipment within 14 days of an order • Dispute arose and Merritt sued for specific performance under a requirements contract. RXP argued it was an options contract.

More Related