1 / 17

Ultrasound Imaging Capability for Otologic Surgical Drills

Ultrasound Imaging Capability for Otologic Surgical Drills. Julianna Ianni Meher Juttukonda David Morris Advisor: Dr. Jadrien Young, M.D. What is Otologic Surgery?. Surgery of the ear Mastoidectomy Mastoid air-filled spaces behind the ear Uses to remove cells from the mastoid

vaughan
Download Presentation

Ultrasound Imaging Capability for Otologic Surgical Drills

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ultrasound Imaging Capability for Otologic Surgical Drills JuliannaIanni MeherJuttukonda David Morris Advisor: Dr. Jadrien Young, M.D.

  2. What is Otologic Surgery? • Surgery of the ear • Mastoidectomy • Mastoid • air-filled spaces behind the ear • Uses • to remove cells from the mastoid • to treat anti-biotic resistant infections in the region • to insert a cochlear implant • 30,000 to 60,000 performed annually in the U.S. [1]

  3. Anatomy of the Ear

  4. Mastoidectomy Clip

  5. Objectives • To find and attach an ultrasound transducer to an otologic surgical drill. • To calculate the thickness of the mastoid bone using US • To shut off the drill when the mastoid bone has been drilled or provide the surgeon with enough information to stop at the correct distance.

  6. Why Ultrasound?

  7. Past Work • Studied ultrasound equipment in order to determine the most effective way to produce accurate images • Researched the best transducer frequency for imaging that region of the skull • Developed the website • Observed use of otologic drills & identify design constraints • Identified potential design obstacles • Generated design ideas concerning mechanism of attachment • Restructured design goals focusing more on finding an ultrasound transducer compatible with an otologic drill. • Performed some proof of concept tests for ultrasound depth measurements through bone.

  8. Solidworks Prototype Side View Top View Bottom View

  9. The Prototype • The ultrasound transducer is placed so that it allows for the surgeon to quickly move the transducer into place to perform quick ultrasound scans. • When not in use the transducer can be moved back out of the way and will allow the surgeon to quickly return to work. • This set up allows for the surgeon to work quickly and prevents them from wasting a lot of time during surgery while also adding a safer means of cutting through the bones.

  10. Model of Mastoid • Bone -> Acrylic • Speed of Sound = 2750 m/s [4] • Soft Tissue -> Gel • Speed of Sound ~ 1540 m/s

  11. Analysis of Simulation

  12. Results of simulation • (gradient plots matched well w/ built-in edge detection) • Worked really well with 1 layer of acrylic: • Actual thickness= 2.03mm • Measured thickness= 2.23mm w/o tissue & 2.35mm w/tissue • For 4MHz: 2.13mm & 2.23mm respectively • Want accuracy w/in 1mm

  13. Multiple layers of acrylic? • Harder to read • Multiple peaks (including ones at the correct thickness) • Not as distinct from noise • Able to discern correct peaks knowing thickness, but can’t back them out just from data • Most likely due to small air-pockets between layers of acrylic • caused more echoes & attenuation @ ea. intersection

  14. Multiple layers y-gradient amplitude • Example with 2 layers of acrylic • (total thickness= 4.06mm) • w/tissue layer • 8.89MHz Depth(cm)

  15. Statistics

  16. Future Work • Getting transducers in & testing (high frequency and low frequency) • building prototype & attachment for drill • calibrating/signal processing and analysis

  17. References • 1. French, LC et al. “An estimate of the number of mastoidectomy procedures performed annually in the United States”. Ear Nose Throat J. 2008 May; 87(5): 267-70. • 2. Ear Anatomy: http://www.umm.edu/imagepages/1092.htm • 3. Clement, GT et. Al. “Correlation of Ultrasound Phase with Physical Skull Properties”. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2002 May; 28(5): 617-624. • 4. http://www.signal-processing.com/tech/us_data_plastic.htm

More Related