1 / 18

Technology on the Horizon

Technology on the Horizon. Sean J. Smith, Ph.D. seanj@ku.edu University of Kansas http:// seanjsmith.pbworks.com / kcdsg. COLLABORATION. LEARNTOGETHER. SHAREDSUPPORT. COLLABORATION. Tech Use?. Growth – So Many Solutions/Tools Interest – Motivation – Peers – Siblings

vea
Download Presentation

Technology on the Horizon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology on the Horizon Sean J. Smith, Ph.D. seanj@ku.edu University of Kansas http://seanjsmith.pbworks.com/kcdsg

  2. COLLABORATION LEARNTOGETHER

  3. SHAREDSUPPORT COLLABORATION

  4. Tech Use? • Growth – So Many Solutions/Tools • Interest – Motivation – Peers – Siblings • Under-utilization – Evaluation – Implementation • Tech in the IEP

  5. Nolan + IEP ≠ AT

  6. Nolan – The Basics Strengths • Able to take information he hears and remember & apply • Interested in music • Very social individual • Wants to demonstrate what he knows • Interested in books

  7. Nolan – The basics • Poor reader – 1st grade reading level • Horrible handwriting – able to write first name • Limited ability to work with keyboard • Socially immature – behavior challenges • Counting skills stop about 13 • Alternate assessment

  8. Nolan & AT • Where would you begin? • What process would you follow? • What instruments/tools would you use? Why? Who would be engaged? Why? • What would you expect for outcomes? Would these be separate goals? Would they be tied to the IEP Goals?

  9. Mary, Mary, Quite Contrary • Mary, Mary, quite contrary, • How does your student grow? • With follow-up and training • And data collected on each goal.

  10. Consideration Forms 6 • Texas AT Network - http://www.texasat.net/default.aspx?name=trainmod.consideration • WATI - http://wati.org/& GPAT - http://www.gpat.org/information on how to assess for AT considerations. • Fritschi’s AT Tool Chart- http://fritschi.home.mindspring.com/tools2.html - Excellent resource to get one thinking about AT Solutions.

  11. UDL 3 Principles • Provide Multiple Means of Representation • Provide Multiple Means of Action and Expression • Provide Multiple Means of Engagement

  12. udltechtoolkit.wikispaces.com

  13. UDL 101 Number of Web-based Tutorials

  14. Back to Nolan • How does UDL fit within Nolan’s needs? • Where would you lead with UDL? Where in Nolan’s IERP would you say it is not AT but instead, we will address through classroom-wide/school-wide UDL efforts? Explain. • What strengths/weaknesses for Nolan appear to scream, “put UDL-based solutions here?”

  15. Mr. Cottrell, an eighth-grade math teacher, is beginning a chapter on basic geometry.

  16. Mr. Cottrell, an eighth-grade math teacher, is beginning a chapter on basic geometry.

More Related