1 / 16

Updating The Fuel Poverty Indicator For England

Professor David Gordon and Dr Eldin Fahmy Townsend Centre for International Poverty Research University of Bristol. Updating The Fuel Poverty Indicator For England. First developed by CSE and UoB, using 1991 Census and 1996 EHCS data Existing FPI widely used for:

vega
Download Presentation

Updating The Fuel Poverty Indicator For England

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Professor David Gordon and Dr Eldin FahmyTownsend Centre for International Poverty ResearchUniversity of Bristol Updating The Fuel Poverty Indicator For England

  2. First developed by CSE and UoB, using 1991 Census and 1996 EHCS data Existing FPI widely used for: Identifying the small areas with highest needs Targeting fuel poverty programmes at a local level More than 1,100 data downloads (July 03) Used by 200+ local authorities Changes in Census and EHCS data have resulted in more reliable and accurate estimates: 2001 Census Output Area Geography Improvements to 2001 Census indicators Ability to link postcoded house price data to the 2001 Census Improvements in energy use modelling and income measurement in EHCS Why Update the Fuel Poverty Indicator?

  3. What Exactly Do We Mean By Fuel Poverty? “A household is said to be in fuel poverty if it needs to spend more than 10 per cent of its income on fuel to maintain a satisfactory heating regime (21°C in main living areas / 18 °C in other rooms)” • Basic Income Fuel Poverty = Total household income (incl. winter fuel payments): excludes income related directly to housing • Full Income Fuel Poverty = Total household income including income from: • Housing Benefit • Income Support Mortgage Interest • Mortgage Payment Protection Insurance • Council Tax Benefit • Less payment of Council Tax

  4. The following groups are especially vulnerable: Unemployed households (HRP) Under-occupied households Household without a car Single pensioners Households without central heating Lone parents Disabled people LA and private renters Who Is Most At Risk of Fuel Poverty? • Two groups are vulnerable to fuel poverty: • People with lows incomes • People with low/moderate incomes living in energy inefficient housing

  5. Outline of Methodology

  6. Estimating the Risk of Fuel PovertyUnivariate and Multivariate Odds (Full Income) Data: 2003 EHCS households

  7. Basic Income FPI is equal to: 1.3% of hhlds in properties less than £80,000 + 1.1% of routine/semi-routine employees (HRP) + 1.4% of single pensioner hhlds + 4.7% of single non-pensioner hhlds + 3.7% of lone parent hhlds + 1.9% of private rental hhlds + 1.1% of council tenants + 5.0% of hhlds where HRP is not in work + 1.3% of hhlds in pre-WW1 dwellings + 1.0% of hhlds lacking central heating + 1.1% of hhlds lacking educ. qualifications (HRP) + 1.0% of under-occupied dwellings + 1.7% of one-person hhlds with 7+ rooms + 2.8% of detached pre-WW1 dwellings Applying the Models: Basic Income FPI

  8. Applying the Models: Full Income FPI Full Income FPI is equal to: 0.8% of hhlds in properties less than £80,000 + 0.6% of routine/semi-routine employee hhlds (HRP) + 1.3% of single pensioner hhlds + 3.0% of single non-pensioner hhlds + 1.6% of lone parent hhlds + 0.9% of private rental hhlds + 3.3% of hhlds in where HRP is not in work + 1.2% of hhlds living in pre-WW1 dwellings + 1.0% of hhlds lacking central heating + 1.2% of hhlds without educ. qualifications + 1.5% of under-occupied dwellings + 1.3% of one-person hhlds with 7+ rooms + 2.2% of hhlds in detached pre-WW1 dwellings

  9. Maps of Basic and Full Income FPI at MSOA Level, 2001 Census data Basic Income FPI Full Income FPI

  10. EHCS is not designed to accurately measure household income EHCS income model differs from measures used in other Government surveys: Income is not adjusted (equivalised) for household composition and sizes Assumes reported household incomes less than the Income Support threshold to be miss-reported Further work explores how the rate and geography of fuel poverty changes if Household incomes are adjusted to need (equivalised) Households with very low incomes are assumed to have reported their incomes correctly These changes to the 2001 EHCS Income Model make results more comparable with other surveys (e.g. FRS, EFS) Alternative Definitions and Measures of Fuel Poverty

  11. The overall rate of fuel poverty is not very sensitive to the way Full and Basic Incomes are measured BUT the Official FPI places greater emphasis upon: Single person households Single pensioner households Under-occupied households The HBAI-FPI places greater emphasis upon: Households containing large families Overcrowded households Households in urban areas (esp. London) Household in remote rural areas (Southwest, East Anglia, Northumbria, etc.) Vulnerability to Fuel Poverty:Full Income FPI vs. HBAI FPI

  12. Maps of Basic and Full Income HBAI-FPI at MSOA Level, 2001 Census data Basic Income HBAI-FPI Full Income HBAI-FPI

  13. The Effects of Changing Definitions and Measures Full Income FPI vs HBAI Full FPI

  14. The ability to find and target households suffering fuel poverty is vital in eliminating fuel poverty The new FPI should help policy makers and programme managers to target resources at areas of greatest need BUT results are ‘best estimates’ and need to be interpreted in the light of local knowledge and expertise Changes in measurement of incomes also affect the composition and geography of fuel poverty… If the FPI is used to inform the allocation of resources then the official indicator is preferred It is always useful to investigate consistency in estimates between the different approaches Conclusions: Which Indicator to Use?

  15. Professor David Gordon and Dr Eldin FahmyTownsend Centre for International Poverty ResearchUniversity of Bristol Updating The Fuel Poverty Indicator For England

More Related