1 / 15

The focusing mirror system

The focusing mirror system. spherical (elliptical) mirror within gap volume for backward refl. plane mirror just beyond radiator for forward reflections. Minimize detector area (~1 m 2 /sector) interference with FTOF. TOF. Low material budget. Reflecting inside. direct &

velma-combs
Download Presentation

The focusing mirror system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The focusing mirror system • spherical (elliptical) mirror within gap volume for backward refl. • plane mirror just beyond radiator for forward reflections Minimize detector area (~1 m2/sector) interference with FTOF TOF Low material budget Reflecting inside direct & reflected Preliminary studies with mirrors (to reduce instrumented area): - focalization capabilities shown - ring patterns for positive and negative mesons at different angles and momenta reconstructed Different scenarios (refractive index, radiator thickness, mirror geometry) are being explored

  2. Hit prob > 3 10-4 Hit prob

  3. Unidentified events: reduced by better treatment of unwanted events (i.e. muon from meson decay) Mismatch in number of N p.e.: wrong seed assignment Protons weird probability: feature of the LH definition close to the threshold

  4. Direct ring example: Hit prob > 3 10-3 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm Mirror: 14-25o PMTs: UBA Hit prob

  5. Hybrid ring example: Hit prob > 3 10-3 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm Mirror: 14-25o PMTs: UBA Hit prob

  6. Average N p.e. : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm N p.e. > 5 for reflected rings N p.e. > 12 for direct rings

  7. LHp-LHk,p : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm Low angles more challenging Possibly due to limited number of trials Protons benefit the small number of unfired PMTs whit expected signal (P is small when C=0) -

  8. Average N p.e. : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm Mandatory for positive hadrons Benefit for negative hadrons at large angles and small energy Big dot = studies show in the previous slide

  9. Average N p.e. : PMTs: UBA Mirror 14-25o Mirror 14-35o Worse for positive hadrons Better for negative hadrons

  10. LHp-LHk,p : PMTs: UBA Mirror 14-25o Mirror 14-35o Worse for positive hadrons Better for negative hadrons

  11. Average N p.e. : PMTs: UBA 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm Mirror up to 35o: Worse for positive hadrons Better for negative hadrons

  12. Average N p.e. : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA n=1.03 Aer. thick 3-6-9-12-15 cm n=1.06 Aer. thick 2-4-6-8-10 cm n=1.03 gives less photons regardeless the increase thickness due to same assumed transmission length

  13. LHp-LHk,p : Mirror 14-25o PMTs: UBA n=1.03 Aer. thick 3-6-9-12-15 cm n=1.06 Aer. thick 2-4-6-8-10 cm n=1.03 still good due to the larger Cherenkov angle separation

  14. Average N p.e. : PMTs: UBA 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm n=1.06 better for patter recognition in the presence of backgrouns

  15. Wrong ID example: Hit prob > 3 10-3 200 trials per point Aerogel: - n=1.06 - thick. increasing with radius: 2-4-6-8-10 cm Mirror: 14-25o PMTs: UBA Hit prob

More Related