1 / 13

Modeling Interspecific Competition Lotka Volterra

Modeling Interspecific Competition Lotka Volterra. Effect of interspecific competition on population growth of each species: dN 1 / d t = r max1 N 1 ((K 1 -N 1 - α 12 N 2 ) / K 1 ) dN 2 / d t = r max2 N 2 ((K 2 -N 2 - α 21 N 1 ) / K 2 )

ventimiglia
Download Presentation

Modeling Interspecific Competition Lotka Volterra

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Modeling Interspecific Competition Lotka Volterra • Effect of interspecific competition on population growth of each species: • dN1 / dt = rmax1N1((K1-N1 -α12N2)/ K1) • dN2 / dt = rmax2N2 ((K2-N2-α21N1) / K2) • α12: Effect of individual of species 2 on rate of pop. growth of species 1. • α21: Effect of individual of species 1 on rate of pop. growth of species 2.

  2. Lotka Volterra • In general, LV predicts coexistence of two species when, for both species, interspecific competition is weaker than intraspecific competition. • LV predicts population growth for the two species will stop when: • N1=K 1 - α12 N2 and N2 = K 2 - α21 N1

  3. Lotka Volterra Zero Growth Isoclines • Above: Population decreasing • Below: Population increasing • Parallel isoclines will result in competitive exclusion of species with lower K value. • Coexistence of two species is only possible when isoclines cross. • Trajectories between isoclines always toward higher K values. (e.g. “c” is unstable coexistance)

  4. Paramecia Lab Experiments • Gause demonstrated resource limitation with Paramecium caudatum and Paramecium aurelia in presence of two different concentrations of Bacillus pyocyaneus. • When grown alone, carrying capacity determined by intraspecific competition. • When grown together, P. caudatum quickly declined. • Reduced resource supplies increased competition.

  5. Paramecia Lab Experiments

  6. Flour Beetle Experiments • What’s a niche? Collective environmental factors that influence growth, survival, and reproduction. • Tribolium beetles infest stored grain products. • Park studied interspecific competition between T. confusum and T. castaneum under varied environmental conditions. • Had similar fundamental niches; when grown alone the abiotic constraints were similar. • Growing the two species together suggested interspecific competition restricts the realized niches (adds biotic influences) of both species to fewer environmental conditions.

  7. Niche Overlap and Competition Between Barnacles • Connell discovered interspecific competition in barnacles. Balanus plays a role in determining lower limit of Chthamalus within intertidal zone. • Did not account for all observed patterns.

  8. Competition and Niches of Small Rodents • Brown studied competition among rodents in Chihuahuan Desert. • Predicted if competition among rodents is mainly for food, then small granivorous rodent populations would increase in response to removal of larger granivorous rodents. • Insectivorous rodents would show little or no response. • Results supported hypothesis.

  9. Competition and Niches of Small Rodents

  10. Character Displacement= evolution of niche divergence by competition • The degree of competition is assumed to depend upon degree of niche overlap, • Interspecific competition has been predicted to lead to directional selection for reduced niche overlap. • Galapagos finch size versus seed size.

  11. allopatric Galapagos Finch Character Displacement sympatric

  12. Character Displacement • Taper and Case: Necessary criteria for C.D.: • Morphological differences between sympatric populations are statistically greater than differences between allopatric populations. • Differences between sympatric and allopatric populations have genetic basis. • Differences between sympatric and allopatric populations evolved in place, and are not derived from different founder groups already differing in the character.

  13. Taper and Case: Characteristics • Variation in the character must have a known effect on use of resources. • Must be demonstrated competition for the resource and competition must be directly correlated with character similarity. • Differences in character cannot be explained by differences in resources available to each of the populations.

More Related