1 / 16

ICA clustering vs. CORRMAP for EEG pre-processing using EEGLAB

ICA clustering vs. CORRMAP for EEG pre-processing using EEGLAB. Amir Omidvarnia Nov. 23, 2009. Outline. EEGLAB Guideline tips of Using ICA for EEG pre-processing Introduction to CORRMAP Results of ICA Clustering on continues data. EEGLAB Tips.

vern
Download Presentation

ICA clustering vs. CORRMAP for EEG pre-processing using EEGLAB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ICA clustering vs. CORRMAP forEEG pre-processing using EEGLAB Amir Omidvarnia Nov. 23, 2009

  2. Outline • EEGLAB Guideline tips of Using ICA for EEG pre-processing • Introduction to CORRMAP • Results of ICA Clustering on continues data

  3. EEGLAB Tips • “Finding N components (from N-channel data) typically requires more thankN^2 data sample points (at each channel), where N^2 is the number of weights in the unmixing matrix and k is a multiplier. In our experience, the value of k increases as the number of channels increases.”  From EEGLAB Website • It means that we should apply ICA on continues data, not after extracting epochs and applying ICA on each condition separately.

  4. EEGLAB Tips • “We do not recommend this approach (concatenating datasets of all subjects together), since it tacitly assumes that the very same set of brain and non-brain source locations and, moreover, orientations, plus the very same electrode montage exist in each session and/or subject.”  From EEGLAB Website • “We recommend performing one ICA decomposition on all the data collected in each data collection session, even when task several conditions are involved.”  From EEGLAB Website

  5. CORRMAP • CORRMAP is a plug-in for EEGLAB toolbox which gets an IC template as its input and finds all other similar IC’s within several datasets based on a correlation-like criterion. • CORRMAP needs at least two datasets and it finds at most three similar IC’s from each dataset. Therefore, we need to record more than one trial per session from each subject, or split one dataset into two or more, if we want to use CORRMAP.

  6. CORRMAP • In fact, CORRMAP constructs a cluster of similar IC’s in compare to the input template. So, CORRMAP can be used along with ICA Clustering (It has been recommended by CORRMAP creators).

  7. CORRMAP • Standard form of Pattern Reversal VEP  From “Visual Evoked Potentials Standard (2004)”

  8. CORRMAP • Template selection is heuristic and needs experience. • A typical proper template (in my mind!)

  9. CORRMAP • A typical proper template (in my mind!) ERSP (A presentation of average PSD in time-frequency plane) ITC (A presentation of Alpha phase coherence)

  10. CORRMAP • Typical output of CORRMAP as a part of EEGLAB (Of course, I have fed two identical datasets into it)

  11. ICA Clustering on continues data (before extracting epochs) • Because of memory shortage, I’m not still able to apply ICA on most continues datasets. • Best cluster for the VEP dataset of Subject SS

  12. ICA Clustering on continues data (before extracting epochs) Before After

  13. ICA Clustering on continues data (before extracting epochs) Before After

  14. ICA Clustering on continues data (before extracting epochs) Before After

  15. ICA Clustering on continues data (before extracting epochs) Before After

  16. ICA Clustering on continues data (before extracting epochs) Before After

More Related