1 / 13

Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status. Oregon Department of Education October, 2012. ESEA Title III: Sec 3122.

vern
Download Presentation

Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Title III Improvement Plans2-Year status Oregon Department of Education October, 2012

  2. ESEA Title III: Sec 3122 (2) IMPROVEMENT PLAN- If a State educational agency determines, based on the annual measurable achievement objectives described in subsection (a), that an eligible entity has failed to make progress toward meeting such objectives for 2 consecutive years, the agency shall require the entity to develop an improvement plan that will ensure that the entity meets such objectives. The improvement plan shall specifically address the factors that prevented the entity from achieving such objectives.

  3. An improvement plan should focus only on those things that we intend to improve or refine, not everything that we are already doing.

  4. MAIN PURPOSE OF IPs TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT THUS FACILITATING MEETING THE AMAOs

  5. IMPROVEMENT PLANS Include the following: • Identification of factors that prevent districts/schools from meeting the AMAOs • Data Analysis • Goals • Follow-up/Monitoring implementation of the plan

  6. 1. Identification of factors that prevent districts/schools from meeting the AMAOs OR, WHAT BARRIERS ARE IN PLACE THAT MAY NOT ALLOW ELLs TO MEET AMAOs.

  7. 2. Data Analysis INQUIRY INQUIRY

  8. 3. Goals Goals are directly related to the AMAOs district/schools need to improve and are written in terms of student achievement. For example: At the end of SY 2012-13, Rose Grove Elementary School will show an increase in ELs moving up one proficiency level up from 54% to 64%, and increase of 10%, as measured by the ELPA.

  9. 4. Implementation of the plan

  10. PERIODICALLY CHECK ON HOW ACTIONS/ACTIVITIES ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED BY COLLECTNG DATA ON THEIR IMPLEMENTATION. Monitoring

  11. MONITORING PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION STRATEGY PERFORMANCE RESULTS

  12. EVALUATION OF IPs

More Related