1 / 35

why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans

P. A. L. Community College Baltimore County. Outline of Today’s Presentation. why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans. the accelerated learning program. A. L. P. The Accelerated Learning Project. RDG 052. RDG 051. ENGL 051. ENGL 052. ENG 101. ENG

vernados
Download Presentation

why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P A L Community College Baltimore County Outline of Today’s Presentation • why we developed ALP • what ALP is • results • costs • future plans the accelerated learning program A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  2. RDG 052 RDG 051 ENGL 051 ENGL 052 ENG 101 ENG 102 MATH 082 MATH 083 MATH 081 CCBC’s Developmental Education Program:Courses A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  3. took no more writing courses 111 11% have not passed 052 318 31% A, B, or C in 101 358 35% S in 052 705 69% took 101 594 58% took 052 fa 06 1023 D, F. I, or W in 101 236 23% The Problem ALP Addresses results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 42%

  4. Outline of Today’s Presentation • why we developed ALP • what ALP is • results • costs • future plans A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  5. ENG 052 ENG 101 semester 2 Traditional ENG 052 semester 1 A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  6. ENG 101 ENG 052 semester 1 semester 1 ALP A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  7. Outline of Today’s Presentation • why we developed ALP • what ALP is • results • costs • future plans A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  8. took no more writing courses 111 11% have not passed 052 318 31% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% A, B, or C in 101 358 35% S in 052 422 81% S in 052 705 69% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 594 58% took 052 fa 06 1023 D, F. I, or W in 101 236 23% results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010

  9. took no more writing courses 111 11% took no more writing courses 0 0% have not passed 052 318 31% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% A, B, or C in 101 358 35% S in 052 422 81% S in 052 705 69% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took 101 594 58% took 052 fa 06 1023 D, F. I, or W in 101 236 23% students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010

  10. took no more writing courses 111 11% took no more writing courses 0 0% have not passed 052 318 31% U, W, or I in 052 102 19% A, B, or C in 101 358 35% A, B, or C in 101 365 70% S in 052 422 81% S in 052 705 69% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took 101 594 58% took 052 fa 06 1023 D, F. I, or W in 101 159 30% D, F. I, or W in 101 236 23% results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010

  11. took no more writing courses 111 11% took no more writing courses 0 0% have not passed 052 318 31% have not passed 052 102 19% passed 052 705 69% passed 052 422 81% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took 101 594 58% passed 101 358 35% passed 101 365 70% took 052 fa 06 1023 have not passed 101 159 30% did not pass 101 236 23% results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010 42% students who took ALP from fall 07 to spring 10 as of June 2010 19%

  12. 35% pass ENGL 101 70% pass ENGL 101 74% pass ENGL 101 69% pass ENGL 101 71% pass ENGL 101 58% pass ENGL 101 68% pass ENGL 101 ALP Success Rates, 2007-09 75% 50% 25% ALP fall 07 traditional 052 fall 06 ALP spring 08 ALP fall 09 ALP spring 10 ALP fall 08 ALP spring 09 A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  13. took no more writing courses 111 11% took 102 187 36% passed ENG 102 107 10% took ENG 102 154 15% passed ENG 102 127 24% took no more writing courses 0 0% have not passed 052 102 19% have not passed 052 318 31% passed 052 705 69% passed 052 422 81% took 052 2007-09 524 took 101 524 100% took 101 594 58% passed 101 358 35% passed 101 365 70% took 052 fa 06 1023 have not passed 102 60 11% haven’t taken ENG 102 178 34% F, I, or W in ENG102 47 5% haven’t taken ENG 102 125 12% have not passed 101 159 30% did not pass 101 236 23%

  14. 10% 15% 5% 7% Longitudinal Studies: degree completion 15% traditional ENGL 052 fall 06 ALP 2007-8 A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  15. Nikki Edgecombe and Davis Jenkins Community College Research Center Teachers College, Columbia University Funded by the Lumina Foundation Community College of Baltimore CountyAccelerated Learning Program (ALP) Preliminary Analysis of Effectiveness

  16. Outline of Today’s Presentation • why we developed ALP • what ALP is • results • costs • future plans A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  17. Costs Under Traditional Model 500 students A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  18. Costs Under Traditional Model 20 students per section A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  19. Costs for Dev Course Under Traditional Model 25 sections of Dev Eng X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 75 faculty credit hours A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  20. Costs for ENG 101 Under Traditional Model 37% of traditional developmental students take FYC .37 X 500 = 185 students 185 students ÷ 20 students/section = 9.25 sections 9.25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 27.75 faculty credit hours A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  21. Costs for FYC* Under Traditional Model total for developmental course = 75 faculty credit hours 27.5 faculty credit hours total for FYC = total = 102.5 faculty credit hours A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  22. Costs Under ALP 500 students A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  23. Costs Under ALP 8 students per section A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  24. Costs Under ALP Model 62.5 sections of ALP Dev Eng X 2 faculty credit hours/section = 125 faculty credit hours A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  25. Costs for FYC Under ALP Model 100% of ALP developmental students take FYC 1.00 X 500 = 500 students 500 students ÷ 20 students/section = 25 sections 25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section = 75 faculty credit hours A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  26. Comparison of Costs for 500 Students Traditional ALP DEV: 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75.00 fch* DEV: 62.5 sect X 2 cr/sect = 125 fch FYC: 9.25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 27.75 fch FYC: 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75 fch TOTAL: 102.75 fch TOTAL: 200 fch A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  27. ALP factory traditional factory ALP factory An Analogy cost/year to operate widgets per year cost per widget $100,000 10,000 $10 $200,000 22,000 $9.09 A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  28. cost per year students per year cost per student traditional factory ALP factory students per year cost per year cost per student An Analogy 175 (35%) of 500 students pass FYC .59 fch per passing student 102.75 fch 350 (70%) of 500 students pass FYC .57 fch per passing student 200 fch A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  29. ALP Summary Based on four semesters of data and 227 students, compared to traditional developmental writing: • ALP doubles the success rate. • cuts the attrition rate in half • does it in half the time • at slightly less cost per successful student The Accelerated Learning Project

  30. Outline of Today’s Presentation • why we developed ALP • what ALP is • results • costs • future plans A L P The Accelerated Learning Project

  31. 160students 20 sections 80 sections 320 students 40 sections 80 students 1280 students 160 sections 640 students 2011-12 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

  32. Dissemination Institutions that are currently offering sections of ALP: El Paso Community College (Texas) Gateway Community College (Kentucky) Lone Star College Tomball (TX) Patrick Henry Community College (Virginia) Valley Forge Military College (PA) North Central State College (OH)

  33. Dissemination Institutions that plan to offer some sections of ALP within one year: Blue Ridge Community and Technical College (WV) The Graduate School (DC) Middlesex Community College (MA) Missouri State University-West Plains (MO) Springfield Technical Community College (MA) West Kentucky Community and Technical College (KY) West Virginia Northern Community College (WV)

  34. Dissemination Institutions that are planning to offer some sections of ALP in the future: Community College of District of Columbia (DC) Delaware Community and Technical College (DE) Jackson Community College (MI) Kingsborough Community College (CUNY) Scott Community College (IA) Tulsa Community College (OK) Wharton County Junior College (TX) WorWic Community College (MD)

  35. Community College Baltimore County L P A thanks for your attention T h e A c c e l e r a t e d L e a r n i n g P r o j e c t

More Related