1 / 17

Report to plenary Carlo Trozzi

Report to plenary Carlo Trozzi. AGENDA. Summary of activities in 2007 Italy contribution on BREF Analysis Open Problems Methodology for domestic combustion Processes vs Combustion emissions Fugitive and diffuse PM emissions SNAP definition Agree to the 2008 workplan.

Download Presentation

Report to plenary Carlo Trozzi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Report to plenaryCarlo Trozzi

  2. AGENDA • Summary of activities in 2007 • Italy contribution on BREF Analysis • Open Problems • Methodology for domestic combustion • Processes vs Combustion emissions • Fugitive and diffuse PM emissions • SNAP definition • Agree to the 2008 workplan

  3. Balances an perspectives

  4. Balances an perspectives

  5. Summary of activities in 2007 • Define the main inputs of the Expert Panel to project team of editing authors (consultant) to restructuring the Guidebok • Provide the project team of editing authors with all information and all relevant underlying material (methods/emission factors) useful to update the guidebook • Support the project team in meeting the industry boards • Analysis of all industrial BREF (ITALY Delegation)

  6. 2007 Meeting • Expert Panel meeting, Rome, 16 April 2007 • Expert Panel meeting, Dessau, 23-24 may 2007 • Expert Workshop on Industrial Processes Utrecht, 11 September 2007 • Informal Meeting of EP with Consultant for GB update and Industry, London, 11 October

  7. Preparation of Rome meeting (industry partecipation to GB update) • The meeting was prepared: • Sending an invitation to all the people in Thessaloniki meeting • Individuating a list of industry reference people (the list was extracted from IPPC BREF documentation) • Sending a specific invitation to industry representative from the TFEIP chair • Inviting the Acting Head of the European IPPC Bureau in JRC

  8. Industry partecipant to the different meeting • Lourens Post CONCAWE (oil companies' Eur. org. for env. healt & safe.) • Brian Smithers CONCAWE • Ole Restad CEMBUREAU (organisation of the cement industry in Europe) • Eirik Nordheim European Aluminium Association • Fabrice Rivet CPIV (European Glass Industries) • Rémi Bussac EURELECTRIC (Union of the Electricity Industry) • Bart van Konijnenburg (Royal VNP, on behalf of CEPI) • Ton Schrijvers (CORUS, on behalf of Eurofer) • Claude Lorea (Cembureau) • Jose M. Adzet (AIICA, on behalf of Cotance) • Ruud Beerkens (TNO, also representing the Glass Industry) • Tom Massey RWENpower/Eurelectric • John Stockdale Britglass • Neil Haines Corus Grp/Eurofer

  9. Italy contribution on BREF Analysis • APAT (Italy Environmental Protection Agency) financial support the work and supervise it • The work was realized in the spring/summer 2007 by Techne Consulting • A report was produced that incorporate also the sectors already analysed in the last years and included in previous revision on Guidebook • The work has regarded the only individuation and extraction of relevant emissions factors from the BREF documentation and presentation in Tables • A report will be send to the TFEIP segretariat and to the consultant in the next weeks

  10. Open Problems • Methodology for domestic combustion • Processes vs Combustion emissions • Fugitive and diffuse emissions • SNAP definition

  11. Small Combustion methodology update • New GB must indicated the possible sources of data and possible surrogate methodology particularly regarding technologies penetration (very important for small combustion installations) referring to Tier1 & Tier2 • Domestic Combustion needs Tier 3 (emissions estimate model) methodologies to be developed

  12. Processes vs Combustion emissions 1 • where we have boilers or heaters in which the combustion is not affected by the process we are in sector 0301 Combustion in boilers, gas turbines and stationary engines; fuel consumption have to be allocated to 0301 • if the fuel is in contact with the products (steel, cement, ...) we have combustion processes with contact (0303 Processes with contact); the emissions factors must be preferably expressed in function of output of the process (g/Mg steel, g/Mg cement, ...) and can be different for different fuel used; emissions factor in function of fuels burned can be included in the chapter but only as references; fuel consumption do not have to be allocated to 0301

  13. Processes vs Combustion emissions 2 • if the steam are in contact with the products (for examples sometimes processes of drying paper) we have: • the emissions for steam generation that can be different for different fuel used: we are in sector 0301 Combustion in boilers, gas turbines and stationary engines; fuel consumption have to be allocated to 0301 • combustion process (combustion with contact) in the activities 030321 Paper-mill industry (drying processes); the emissions factors must be preferably expressed in function of output of process (g/Mg paper, ...) and allocate to SNAP 04…; no fuel consumption

  14. Processes vs Combustion emissions 3 • if the exhaust gases of boilers and heaters are in contact with the products (for examples sludge drying, ...) we have combustion processes with contact (0303 Processes with contact); the emissions factors must be preferably expressed in function of output of the process (g/Mg sludge, ...) and can be different for different fuel used; emissions factor in function of fuels used can be included in the chapter but only as references; fuel consumption do not have to be allocated to 0301

  15. Fugitive and diffuse emissions The EP recommend to the consultant to take into consideration all the relevant process actually not included in the GB (see also, but not only, the new SNAP proposal)

  16. SNAP nomenclature EP propose to mantain the new SNAP nomenclature “open” to finalize at the end of GB update

  17. Revision Process • Consultant send to EP leader the list of relevant chapters for review • EP leader circulate the list and ask to EP member cooperation in review project • EP leader prepare a program for review the GB chapters included time and people • EP leader organize a meeting to evaluate the review project • Date will be fixed for the end of year

More Related