1 / 16

Privacy: let‘s stop thinking small

Explore the complexities of privacy in society, technology, and behavior. Evaluate tools, redefine privacy, and challenge standard approaches. Join the conversation on disclosure, evaluation, and the boundaries of privacy. Discover a broader view.

veronicaf
Download Presentation

Privacy: let‘s stop thinking small

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Privacy:let‘s stop thinking small Bettina Berendt Dept. Computer Science KU Leuven http://people.cs.kuleuven.be/~bettina.berendt/

  2. Established wisdoms …

  3. “Overdisclosure“  privacy problems

  4. Tools (technological and otherwise)  privacy solutions

  5. Evaluation  validation of tools

  6. Tool types à la SPION • Confidentiality • Control • Awareness of ... • „I am being tracked.“ • „which audiences do I have (whom I could give access)?“  e.g., FreeBu • „when I am thinking too small about this“

  7. A bigger picture Environment - technology, society Mental schema - privacy, p. problems Behaviour - disclosure, evaluation

  8. Environment - technology, society Mental schema - privacy, p. problems Behaviour - disclosure, evaluation A bigger picture

  9. Society, technology interpersonal boundaries  disclosure E S B

  10. Disclosure  disclosure  (over)evaluation E S B BUT: Evaluating something/someone along different dimensions can lead to worse judgements and less satisfying decisions

  11. E S B Evaluation  disclosure

  12. E S B Evaluation  privacy definitions & technology Def. of “appropriate”; Privacy is social privacy and some chilled overdisclosure (as opposed to instrumental privacy) [Moreno et al., 2009]

  13. E S B Evaluation  privacy definitions Privacy is an individually owned and tradeable good (as opposed to a fundamental right or a social good) Slashdot article on [Jentzsch, Preibusch & Harasser, 2012]

  14. Please argue with me about • Let us not divide and conquer ourselves: • The standard (scientific ?!) distribution of work can be a dangerous self-blinding and continued delegation of responsibility when it comes to problems like privacy. • (Being forced to) being responsible is not only bad, but also part and parcel of being a human & a citizen. • We need awareness (tools), but we also need to build • true private spaces • true public spaces • “Privacy is not only about clicking Facebook.“

  15. This talk was inspired by many … Intro quote (“I asked the audience not to tweet or blog while I was talking. Not out of respect for me, but out of respect for themselves.“): • Lanier, J. (2010). You are Not a Gadget. A Manifesto. New York: Knopf. http://www.jaronlanier.com/gadgetwebresources.html P.9: • Turkle, S. (2010). Alone Together. Why we Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books. http://alonetogetherbook.com/ • Altman, I. (1976). Privacy: A conceptual analysis. Environment and Behaviour, 8(1), 7-29. P. 10: • Illouz, E. (2012). Why Love Hurts. Cambridge: Polity Press. – especially her reading of • Wilson, T.D. & Schooler, J.W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 181-192. • Ofir, C. & Simonson, I (2001). In search of negative customer feedback: The effect of expecting to evaluate on satisfaction and evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2),170-182.

  16. Specific cited sources(these are examples of wider research areas) P. 12: • Moreno MA, Vanderstoep A, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Kurth A, and Christakis DA. Reducing at-risk adolescents' display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: a randomized controlled pilot intervention trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 163(1): 35-41, 2009. P. 13: • Nicola Jentzsch, Sören Preibusch, Andreas Harasser. Study on monetising privacy. An economic model for pricing personal information. European Network and information Security Agency (ENISA). Deliverable, February 2012. http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/identity-and-trust/library/deliverables/monetising-privacy

More Related