830 likes | 1.02k Views
Teaching and Learning Elementary. 10.15.13 Dean Ave. Conference Room. Today’s Agenda. Welcome & Outcomes for our Work School Improvement Plans: Process for Monitoring Data Teams Close Reading Task Force Supporting Science & Social Studies Instruction District PLC Session Updates.
E N D
Teaching and LearningElementary 10.15.13 Dean Ave. Conference Room
Today’s Agenda • Welcome & Outcomes for our Work • School Improvement Plans: Process for Monitoring Data Teams • Close Reading Task Force • Supporting Science & Social Studies Instruction • District PLC Session • Updates
DMPS Collective Commitments, 2012-13 • We will function as a professional learning community • We will develop leadership capacity • We will be data driving in our decision-making • We will establish clear expectations and regularly monitor progress • We will provide support and resources to sustain school improvement • We will share and celebrate success
Objectives for the Central Office Reorganization, 2013-14 • Dramatically accelerate and improve student achievement district-wide • Redesign the district central office to support, scale, and sustain school improvement efforts • Create greater coherence in alignment in and among departments within the district central office • Increase central office collaboration and customer service, ensuring that all activities are student-centered and results-oriented • Establish shared accountability for student and school success by clearly articulating the roles and functions of each department • Strategically reallocate resources in an effort to maximize the return on investment and realize cost savings
Creating Coherence Across Departments, 2013-14 Office of Schools and CIA Elementary and Secondary Foci • Instructional Effectiveness • Data Driven Decision Making • Collaborative Systems • Access and Equity
We believe that we have the right people, the right ideas, and are in the process of building the right tools
Multi-Tiered System of Support • Redesigned School Improvement Plan template and planning process • Systemic coaching structure for new principals and teachers • School visits by Office of Schools • Metric which identifies schools within a structure of intervention levels: Universal, Watch, Targeted, and Intensive • Application of school-level standard treatment protocol at the Targeted and Intensive levels • District-level data team process to analyze student achievement and culture/climate data in order to monitor and adjust school-level standard treatment protocol interventions and support to schools
Multi-Tiered System of Support School-level Standard Treatment Protocols are identified by Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment and the Office of Schools and will focus on: • effective instructional practices • data-driven decision-making • collaborative structures • equity and access • culture and climate.
District-Level Data Team Purpose: To build collective capacity to problem-solve and to monitor and adjust interventions (standard treatment protocol) Description: Will meet a minimum of three times each year to analyze academic and culture/climate data for all DMPS schools Membership: District administrators from the Office of Schools; Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment (CIA); Student and Family Services; Learning Services Format:Analysis of data elements, identifying trends, inferring of strengths and needs, and inferring root cause
Multi-Tiered System of Support This meets DE requirements for SINA 4+ schools related to Restructuring
Title I Schools: C-Plan • AYP letters – by October 25 • C-Plan Word document will be emailed • Copy and paste responses to C-Plan questions from the Word document • Certify the SINA C-Plan before Monday, October 28 • Email Wilma if you need help
SIP UNDERSTANDINGS • Working document for schools – an action plan and a guide for schools to monitor their implementation of the plan • Includes information needed by schools and the district to plan, act, and monitor for school improvement • Data should engage all staff in the school improvement work
SIP Progress Monitoring The new SIP template is designed to support a focus on progress monitoring New elements to the SIP • Quick Win Indicators • Long Term Indicators
SIP Action Plan: Quick Win Indicators Describes what schools monitor periodically during the year (approximately every 6 weeks) toward meeting Long Term Indicators and SMART GOALS • Every initiative must have a Quick Win Indicator for at least one adult action (implementation data) and one student action (student performance data) • monitoring tool • metric (level of proficiency) • frequency of monitoring • Does not need to be stated as a SMART goal
SIP Action Plan: Long Term Indicators Describes what schools monitor periodically during the year (once or twice each year) towards meeting the SMART goals • Every initiative must have a Quick Win Indicator for at least one adult action (implementation data) and one student action (student performance data) • monitoring tool • metric (level of proficiency) • frequency of monitoring • Must be stated as a SMART goal
Data Teams 85% of schools formally identified Data Teams as one of their SIP initiatives
Data Analysis TODAY: Provide support related to your work on progress monitoring your SIP – Data Teams process • Data analysis is required • Progress monitoring of your SIP is required • A specific process is NOT required
What we have learned so far… • The work done last spring and summer allowed many teams to start this process during Unit 1! • Data Team Form Templates are available on the website – these are meant to be modified to meet your school needs. • Largest area of concern continues to be the creation of Common Formative Assessments – We are continuing to add passages to our website to support this process.
Goal for Step #1: Focusing our Instruction Promote teacher conversation & understanding of the grade-level standards: • What does the standard expect of students? • How do the different standards fit together? • What does this standard look like at previous or future grade levels? Great resource to promote this conversation:
Goals for Step 2: Create the Pre/Post Common Formative Assessment • Assessment items directly aligned to prioritized I Can Statements. • Assessment items are designed to highlight the strengths and needs of students. • Assessment passages are grade level text. • Assessment length is reasonable. Resources to Support: • Journeys passages (practice book, projectable, unit assessments) • Read Works Website • District provided options (available on the elementary literacy website)
Step #3: Set the SMART Goal The percentage of students scoring proficient or higher on our prioritized I Can Statements will increase from ________% to ________% measured by the posttest administered on ___________________________.
Goals for Step #4: Identify Strengths and Needs • The group analyzes the pre-assessment data to determine student strengths and areas of need, in reference to the team “I Can” statements. • Direct analysis of student work is necessary to complete this step.
Goals for Step #5: Planning for Instruction • The group determines implications for whole group and small group instruction based on the team “I Can” statements and the pre-assessment student data. • Specific materials for use, teacher actions and student actions are articulated. • The group reviews the available materials within Journeys and determines what modifications to instruction and teacher language are necessary to accomplish our team “I Can” statements. Resources to Support: • JOURNEYS • The Common Core Book
Expectations for Implementation • Timeframe: October 28th – November 22nd • Minimum Number of Observations: 2 per grade level team (literacy and/or math) = 12 total • Participants in the Study: • School Principal • Instructional Coach (*optional) • Released Deans (*optional) • Elementary Directors ** Email Carlyn with 3 dates & times for an Elementary Director to provide an onsite observation.
How will this data be used? • At School Level: School Improvement Plan Monitoring • What areas of the Data Teams process are working • What additional supports may be necessary for individual teams • What teams are ready for a “gradual release” • At the District Level: • Determine areas of need for Teaching & Learning meetings • Identify specific supports that can be provided by the Elementary Directors during site visits
Action Planning • Self-Assessment: What is our current reality? What teams or subject area do we want to focus on? • Planning: When will we complete these observations? Who will participate? • Email Carlyn: 3 dates & times for an Elementary Director onsite observation.
Building our Capacity • Purpose of Close Reading is to provide a teaching framework for teachers to support complex text, as required by Common Core.
Using the Modules • Designed to be facilitated at the school level. • Whole Staff Professional Development • Grade Level Team Meetings / PLCs • Teacher-Led
Close Reading PD Modules • PowerPoint format housed on Sharepoint • Accessed by facilitator through www.elementaryliteracy.dmschools.org; Click PD tab:
Format of a Typical Module… • 30 minute sessions • Supported by theory and rationale • Include practical application examples, • including video demonstrations • structure for implementation • sharing artifacts • Include related article excerpts • All articles, videos, and other resources needed will be embedded into the PowerPoint to make facilitating the sessions very simple.
Module Overview • Module 1: What is Close Reading? (Tentative Outline) • Module 2: Choosing the Text • Module 3: Pre-Reading • Module 4-5: Text Dependent Questions • Module 6: Managing the Learning Environment during Close Reading • Modules 7-9: Scaffolded Reading Instruction • Module 10: Demonstrating Understanding and Assessing Performance
Launching the Modules November Teaching & Learning: • We will engage in Module 1 together • We will further discuss implementation of the Modules • Modules 1-5 will be available for school use
What we’ve learned so far… • Focus should be on science skills within the context of the content • Important skills include claims/evidence writing, summarizing, data collection and interpretation, measurement and critical thinking/questioning • The content is a vehicle to teach these skills. Teachers should let the student’s questions guide the learning within the unit • The “I can” statements guide the teacher in the ending knowledge and skills for that unit • Teacher collaboration is key
Next Generation Science Standards • The NGSS has not yet been adopted by Iowa • So far 8 states have adopted, many are considering • Iowa has assembled a task force which is currently evaluating the NGSS and the current Iowa Core • Adoption or rejection should be announced by January • We will have a 2-3 year implementation plan in Iowa if the standards are adopted • You can view the standards at: http://nextgenscience.org
Going Forward Things to consider: • Keep all Foss Kits in your building. We may need them in the future. • There will be full scale PD for elementary teachers in science this summer. • Please use your science budget to fill Foss Kits first before using it for other science related expenses. • If you would like assistance in working with your staff during PD or collaboration opportunities, do not hesitate to contact Kim O’Donnell or Rob Kleinow.
Current Reality • We are required to have implementation of the Iowa Core • Iowa Core in the Social Studies is grade-banded: K-2 and 3-5 • Standards are divided into the following categories: behavioral sciences,economics,geography, history and political science • Since 2006-2007, curriculum guides have been tied to the adopted materials • Materials from that adoption exist – to varying degrees in our schools. In some cases, there are no materials. • We needed a way to help teachers with resources until the next adoption