130 likes | 204 Views
First CMS Results with LHC Beam. Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute 16-21 February 2009. Tracker 66M Si pixels & 10M Si strips. EM calorimeter: ECAL PbWO 4 crystal calorimeter High resolution
E N D
First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute 16-21 February 2009 Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Tracker 66M Si pixels & 10M Si strips EM calorimeter: ECAL PbWO4 crystal calorimeter High resolution High granularity, >70k crystals Barrel (EB) & Endcap (EE) Hadronic calorimeter: HCAL Brass & scintillator Barrel (HB), Endcap (HE), Outer (HO) Superconducting Solenoid Very large, 6m x 13m 3.8T, 1.6 GJ stored energy Muon System Barrel: Drift Tubes (DT) Endcap: Cathode Strip Chambers (CSC) Barrel & Endcap interleaved with Resistive Plate Chambers (RPC) The CMS Detector Pixels Tracker ECAL HCAL Solenoid Muons Compact, Modular Weight: 12500 t Diameter: 15m Length: 21.6 m Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Beam Splash Schematic The Large Hadron Collider Collimators Beam 2, E=450 GeV Debris CMS BEAM BEAM 146m CMS Beam 1, E=450 GeV Timeline: First LHC Beams • 7-9 September • Single shots of beam 1 onto closed collimator 150m upstream of CMS (“beam splash” events) • 10 September (Media Day!) • Beam 1 circulated in the morning, 3 turns within 1 hour! • Beam 2 circulated by 3:00pm, 300 turns by evening • 11 September • RF system captures beam at evening (millions of orbits) • During all these activities, CMS triggered and recorded data • ~40 hours of beam to CMS Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Beam Splash Event Display Single beam shots of 2*109 protons onto closed collimators Hundreds of thousands of muons pass through CMS per event ECAL energy HCAL energy Longitudinal views BEAM Debris DT muon chamber hits Transverse views LHC Tunnel profile visible Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Correlation Between Energies in Barrel HCAL and ECAL ECAL Barrel ~150 TeV in ECAL & ~1000 TeV in HCAL per splash event Energy (GeV) crystal index i TOP BOTTOM crystal index i Beam Splash: ECAL Energy ECAL Endcaps Enormous amount of energy deposited in calorimeters! ~200 TeV energy deposited in EB+EE > 99% of ECAL channels fired Beam (clockwise) came from plus side. Energy (GeV) crystal index iy crystal index iy crystal index ix crystal index ix Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Beam Halo Muons Beam Halo: Muons outside of beam-pipe, arising from decays of pions created when off-axis protons scrape collimators or other beamline elements Endcap Muon Cathode Strip Chamber Hits from Beam Halo Events Muon Endcap Layer -1 Muon Endcap Layer -2 Muon Endcap Layer -3 Muon Endcap Layer -4 LHC Tunnel Profile BEAM Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Beam Halo Muons 1 muon 3 muons Endcap muon chambers Reconstructed Tracks Barrel muon drift tubes Endcap muon chambers Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Halo and Cosmic Muon Angles Angle of Muon Tracks wrt Beam Line • Beam halomuons to make a small angle • Cosmic Ray muons pass through the CSCs at a more oblique angle • Beam-on distribution consists of two pieces, one resembling cosmic rays and the other matching the beam halo simulation. beam ON data = beam halo MC + cosmic ray data Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Beam Halo Before and After RF Capture First RF capture of beam Beam Halo Rates in Muon Endcaps • Muon Endcap (CSC) halo trigger rate in the minus endcap vs time. • First successful capture lasted for 10 min and ended with beam abort time h:m HCAL Endcap Peak Energy Location & Amp Before After HCAL Endcap Energy • Before, high rate of energy deposition near beamline. • After, beam is cleaner, depositing less energy in HCAL endcap. Y (cm) Y (cm) X (cm) X (cm) Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
CMS Performance with Cosmics CRAFT: Cosmic Run at Full Tesla • ~300 M cosmic events collected • Field at 3.8T operated for ~1 month • Participation from all subsystems • Detector performance studies as well as detailed cosmics studies ongoing Momentum Data vs MC ECAL dE/dx: Experimental data vs Expected stopping power for PbWO4 collision loss brem radiation p (GeV/c) Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
CMS Performance with Cosmics /ndof After Tracker Alignment Si Strip Tracker: Signal to Noise S/N = ~30 Excellent eff > 99% S/N /ndof Pixel & Strip Tracker Alignment: Mean of Residuals Pixel Barrel RMS 47m Strip Inner Barrel RMS 26m Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
CMS Detector Status • Since beginning of September 2008 • All installed CMS sub-detectors in global readout routinely • All triggers operational • Stability of running with all CMS components proven • LHC clock and orbit signals tested • Synchronization to few ns or better • Have continued global data-taking with cosmics • CRAFT: Cosmic Run at Full Tesla • Detector opening started Nov 17th • Interventions/repairs for problematic channels • Installation of Preshower detector Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech
Conclusions • After many years of design & construction, CMS is commissioned and has collected first data with LHC • Detector performance proven with beam splash, beam halo, as well as cosmics with and without B field. Expect more results, not just with single beam or cosmics, but with collisions! Toyoko Orimoto, Caltech