480 likes | 764 Views
Spins of supermassive black holes in quasars and galaxies. Jian -Min Wang ( 王建民 ) Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Dec 1, 2009, ITP. SMBH properties. Physical BHs: mass, spin and charge Astrophysical SMBHs
E N D
Spins of supermassive black holes in quasars and galaxies Jian-Min Wang (王建民) Institute of High Energy Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Dec 1, 2009, ITP
SMBH properties Physical BHs: mass, spin and charge Astrophysical SMBHs • Growth: accretion and mergers • Spins: accretion manner, mergers • Formation: high redshift • Duty cycle: activity, coevolution • Obscuration: unification scheme
Outline • Introduction: quasars and AGNs • Spins 1) Spins: measured from X-rays 2) Spins: measured from -rays 3) spins: cosmological evolution • Dual AGNs: gravitation wave • Conclusions • open questions
AGNs and Quasars: Introduction • Observations: spectra and classifications • Morphology • Theoretical model
BH accretion disk • Release of Gravitational energy • Accretion rates hot corona ADAFs (advection-dominated accretion flows) • Geometry of Accretion
Measurements of SMBH spins from X-rays • Spectral shape • Last stable orbit: radiative efficiency a*: specific angular momentum Spectral shape + last stable orbit→a*
Line profiles: affected by the Doppler shifts and gravity
Dependences of profiles on parameters(Fabian et al. 1989; Laor 1990) • Model parameters: orientation θ emissivity R-β spins: a*
On orientation • a*=0.998, β=0.5
ASCA observation of MCG 6-30-15(Tanaka, et al. 1995, Nature, 375, 659 )
2 Spins of SMBHs from -rays: in M87(Wang et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, L109; Li, Y. et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 513 ) M87: MBH=3.2 ×109M⊙; D=16Mpc M87
Conclusions: t ≤ 2 days; 2) Non-beaming effects
GLAST/Fermi observations(Abado et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 55) -rays escaping from the central region
tQSO tgalaxy 3 Spins: cosmological evolution
Soltan (1982); Chokshi & Turner (1992); Yu & Tremaine (2002); Marconi et al. (2004): =0.1 Main growth of SMBH is driven by accretion Understanding trigger of SMBHs: spins Wang et al. (2006;2008): duty cycle
Spin evolution: -equation(Wang, Hu et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, L141)
Properties and advantages: 1) only depends on observables 2) deep survey data for δ: up to redshift z 3) no need to compare with local BH mass density 4) Spin evolution
Bolometric luminosity function and density(Hopkins et al. 2007)
Results Luminosity density Hopkins et al. (2007) SMBH density Vestergaard et al. (2009) Duty cycle
Cosmological evolution of SMBH spins King & Pringle (2007;2008): random accretion
Evidence for random accretion • Schmidt (1997), Pringle (1998) jet/disk is randomly-orientated torus is randomly-orientated disk+torus+galaxy have random orientation. • Munoz Marin (2007)
Numerical simulations(Berti & Volonteri 2008) Pure mergers Merger+standard accretion Merger+random accretion What is driving the random accretion onto SMBH?
4 Dual AGNs: gravitational wave(Wang et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, L76) Double peaked [O III] profile: T. Heckman (1980; 1981) Whittle (1985) • SDSS: Sloan Digital Sky Survey • 87 type 2 AGN sample • Measurements: redshifts • Properties?
Kepler relation Merritt & Ekers (2002)
Conclusions 1) fast spins: in MCG -6-30-15 and M87 2) strong evolution of SMBH spins: spin-down 3) merging galaxies: dual AGNs
Open questions • X-rays: more detailed and high energy solution • -rays: more observations • Spin evolution: co-evolution of SMBHs and galaxies • Mergers: major and minor mergers.