1 / 16

Y. Xu, H. L. Graber, R. L. Barbour SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Spatial Deconvolution of 3-D Diffuse Optical Tomographic Time Series: Influence of Background Medium Heterogeneity. Y. Xu, H. L. Graber, R. L. Barbour SUNY Downstate Medical Center. Acknowledgements. National Institutes of Health (NIH) R21-HL67387 R21-DK63692 R41-CA96102 R41-NS050007

vinaya
Download Presentation

Y. Xu, H. L. Graber, R. L. Barbour SUNY Downstate Medical Center

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spatial Deconvolution of 3-D Diffuse Optical Tomographic Time Series: Influence of Background Medium Heterogeneity Y. Xu, H. L. Graber, R. L. Barbour SUNY Downstate Medical Center

  2. Acknowledgements • National Institutes of Health (NIH) • R21-HL67387 • R21-DK63692 • R41-CA96102 • R41-NS050007 • R43-NS49734 • U.S. Army • DAMD017-03-C-0018

  3. Enhanced CW DOT Images

  4. Medium Image Medium Image M M M M Reconstruction Reconstruction Filter Origin of Low Resolution in DOT?

  5. Medium Detector Data Image μa(r), D(r) R(r) t = t0: μa(t)1, D(t)1 μa(r), D(r) R(r) t = t0+Δt: μa(r), D(r) μa(r), D(r) R(r) R(r) t = t0+3Δt: t = t0+2Δt: μa(t)2, D(t)2 Spatial Deconvolution Approach

  6. Image Medium Deconvolution operator, or Filter = Spatial Deconvolution Approach

  7. Reconstruction time  10-2 s Deconvolution time  10-3 s Spatial Deconvolution Result

  8. Gray Matter Scalp White Matter Skull CSF M. Temporalis Structural MRI-based Heterogeneity

  9. Scalp Skull Muscle CSF Gray Matter White Matter Source/Detector Complex Heterogeneous “Cylinder”

  10. Static Tumor: μa = 0.24 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1 CSF: μa = 0.08 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1; μa = 0.04 cm-1, μ′s = 5 cm-1 Static Tumor: μa = 0.24 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1 CSF: μa = 0.08 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1; μa = 0.04 cm-1, μ′s = 5 cm-1; μa = 0.01 cm-1, μ′s = 1 cm-1 Static Tumor: μa = 0.24 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1 CSF: μa = 0.08 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1 Dynamic Tumor: f = 0.06 Hz, m = 20% Gray matter: f1 = 0.1 Hz, m = 10%; f2 = 1.0 Hz, m = 2% Static Tumor: μa = 0.24 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1 CSF: μa = 0.08 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1; μa = 0.04 cm-1, μ′s = 5 cm-1; μa = 0.01 cm-1, μ′s = 1 cm-1; μa = 0.005 cm-1, μ′s = 0.5 cm-1 inclusion gray matter Contrast Scalp, Skull, Muscle, White matter: μa = 0.08 cm-1, μ′s = 10 cm-1 (D = 0.0331 cm)

  11. Overestimated CSF Optical Coefficients Underestimated CSF Optical Coefficients Overestimated CSF Optical Coefficients No Mismatch Recovered Images

  12. Target Medium Deconvolved Image (No Mismatch) Deconvolution + Temporal LPF + Spatial LPF Deconvolution + Temporal LPF Noise Level 1: 1% – 10% Noise Level 2: 2% – 20% Noise Level 3: 3% – 30% Impact of Noise in Data

  13. Reconstruct Update Homogeneous Medium + Baseline Data (Mean) What if We Don’t Have an MRI? (I) MRI (II)

  14. What if We Don’t Have an MRI?

  15. Conclusions • Complex medium heterogeneity can have the effect of increasing the spatial and temporal accuracy of deconvolved reconstructed images • Effect of errors in estimates of background optical coefficient values depends on the direction of the error • Overestimating the optical coefficients produces image quality degradation • Underestimating them has minimal, or even beneficial, effects

  16. Conclusions • Two effective methods for increasing confidence in accuracy of deconvolved images • Use structural images to design reference media • Use one nonlinear image reconstruction sequence to produce a heterogeneous reference medium

More Related