310 likes | 440 Views
Styregruppe møde 21/11-2011. Goals for this meeting. Info on progress, time use and technical solution, Risks etc. Accept on budget (Approval in Investeringsrådsmøde ) Approval on technical approach. Overview of the solution - What IBM deliver. Empty servers
E N D
Goals for this meeting • Info on progress, time use and technical solution, Risks etc. • Accept on budget (Approval in Investeringsrådsmøde) • Approval on technical approach
Overview of the solution- What IBM deliver • Empty servers • 2 physical blades as VMware(x2) • ~ 26 Virtuel serves with OS (x2) • 1 physical SQL hotel* (x2) with OS and SQL 2008 • IBM Resource domain, trusted to global.corp • Reuse of SAPA network infrastructure • VPN • Installed I5 series • 2 different OS versions • 3 different M3 versions • HAS setup I5/Movex • “HAS” setup Wintel using VMWare * TBD
Overview of the solution- what OSS deliver • All applications end-to-end • Reinstallation of all applications in new domain, new IP range … • Licenses, media, knowledge, test plan • Integration to … everything • Fileserver setup • Backup tapes of all M3 partitions • TeleWan lines to toKista and Solna • Super Users and Test Users • Failover functionality Wintel
Definition of service In the modell beneath a definition of what services we expect to be included in Technical operation for all included servers (both Iseries and Windows). Only for I5
Baseline of Wintel servers Eslöv • Adjustments from original Baseline • 3 Invoice manager servers removed • 1 Right fax (kåkå) removed
Overview timeline The timeline are subject to change
Important customer dates These are non-confirmed dates. All dates are subject to change
RFC to the contract • Initial Services Commencement Date moved from February 20, 2012 to June 11 2012 • Contract Expiration Date moved from February 20, 2015 to June 11 2015 • Internet connection from Kirsta/Solna (need for webserver) • IBM VPN to 3’rd part vendors and OSS staff • Introduction of Physical servers Awaiting response from IBM. This have economic consequences
Application installation approach • Heavy use of external consultents • Documentation • Installation
Resources • Separate Excel spreadsheet
Important next steps • Approval on Budget • Are we allow to start working with 3’rd part vendors • Customer involvement • Test and go live dates • Test users • Cost • Document all Applications
M3 and Legacy project • Very high focus on end user experience. • Users shall not experience a significant lower quality in the day to day service delivery, compared with today's solution. • A potential risk in the current design is legacy • Users can experience long response time, using the applications located at IBM, due to slow WAN connections. • Introduction of Citrix servers can reduce the response time. • Citrix will not be introduced at this point but considered in legacy project
Citix IBM Citix Eslöv
…on the radar screen • What OS shall be used. (Windows 2008 R2 64 bit) • Update applications • How do we make the failover application synchronization on applications (What have we promised or customers) • Economy: Cost for customers and internal SAP setup not ready… difficult to move forward • Plan B • Delivery and operation • Future roles • Maintenance stop • Helpdesk setup • Education • Who owns the contract in OSS • Budgeting