170 likes | 257 Views
Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor. As of 20091127 vers.A N.Toge. ½. Introduction / Overview (PMs) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091117-ay.docx. Formatted Manuscript on the web? No, only initial draft on web Manuscript in WIP by PMs Remarks ETA?
E N D
Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091127 vers.A N.Toge
½. Introduction / Overview (PMs)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091117-ay.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No, only initial draft on web • Manuscript in WIP by PMs • Remarks • ETA? • Classification • Major schedule threat
3. SB2009 Layout (PM + Paterson)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Layout20091124A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Once but with an open loop • Classification • Somewhat of a concern
4.1 Parameters (PMs + Toge)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091105A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Remarks • Classification • Unlikely to recuperate into a stand-alone subsection. • Suggest integrate into Intro / Overview
4.2 Gradient Issues (Yamamoto)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SCRFDraft20091105a.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No, only initial draft on web • Manuscript in WIP by PMs • Remarks • ETA? • Classification • Major schedule threat
4.3/4 Electron and Positron Sources (Brachmann, Clarke)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Injectors20091121A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Once but w. open loop • Classification • Likely to be OK, pending authors’ timely response
4.5 Damping Rings (Guiducci)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/DR20091123A.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once • Classification • Likely OK, pending small fixes.
4.6 RTML (Solyak)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RTML20091122A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once but with open loop • Classification • Perhaps OK, depending on authors’ response
4.7 ML (Nantista, Fukuda)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/ML20091126A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once but with a semi-open loop • KCS known to be in WIP by authors • Important Comment • Pulse length issue needs to be explained. • Classification • Perhaps OK, pending authors’ timely response
4.8 BDS (Seryi)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/BDS20091124A.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • Classification • Likely OK, pending small fixes.
4.9 CFS (Kuchler)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/CFS20091126A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • Classification • Likely OK, pending small touch-ups.
5. Costing (Garbincius)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Cost20091120A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • More text / tables known to be in WIP by the author. • Classification • Likely OK, pending some guideline clarification by PMs.
6. Risk Analysis (Ross)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RiskDraft20091105.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Author – Editor iteration? • No • Classification • Major schedule threat
A. Availability Analysis (MCR/Avail)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/AvailDraft20091104.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Author – Editor iteration? • Authors known to be at it. ETA unclear. • Classification • Major schedule threat
Critical Issues • ML length • Path length matching known to be addressed • QWT compensation needs clarification • Energy reserve needs clarification • ML alternate pulsing • Handling of lowE beam in highE beamline needs clarification • Costing Reference • “Starting point” needs clarification • Summary statements need group-wide confirmation
Sections at Risk • Intro/Overview • SRF gradient discussion • Risk analysis • Availability
To Do at DESY Face-to-Face • Triage process • Critical open issues • Group-wide or semi-group wide discussion and surgery on the spot. • With some follow-up work on subsequent days. • Semi-trivial touch-ups • Identify issues on the spot. Fixes be applied by the primary authors on the fly. • With some follow-up work on subsequent days if needed. • ~17 subsections x 30 min = 9 hrs .eqv. 1 Full Day + reserve • Time is limited: We need to-the-point and concise-efficient discussion and response. No digressing speech, no tangential commentary, no unproductive ranting, please. • Prep and org for AAP • One quarter day