180 likes | 240 Views
Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor. As of 20091130 vers.B N.Toge. Check: http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SB20091130B.pdf. ½. Introduction / Overview (PMs) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Intro20091130B.docx. Formatted Manuscript on the web?
E N D
Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091130 vers.B N.Toge Check: http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SB20091130B.pdf
½. Introduction / Overview (PMs)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Intro20091130B.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes, although still partially in WIP by PMs • Remarks • Intro • needs minor clean-up • Overview • List of what remains the same as RDR? • Cavity performance “reserve” issue • Classification • PROBABLY OK, IF PMs WORK HARD
3. SB2009 Layout (PM + Paterson)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Layout20091130A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Once • Remarks • ML length needs to be stated. • One more critical editing, anyone? • Classification • Probably OK
X.X Parameters (PMs + Toge)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091105A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Remarks • Classification • Given up. • Has been absorbed as part of 2.2.
4.1 Gradient Issues (Yamamoto)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SRF200911230C.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes, although still partially in WIP by PMs + Experts • Remarks • Needs clean-up cavity performance summary • Needs sort out the statements to make in the cavity performance reserve issue • Classification • Near the edge. Needs attention.
4.2/3 Electron and Positron Sources (Brachmann, Clarke)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Injectors20091130A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Once but w. open loop • Classification • Likely to be OK, pending authors’ timely response
4.4 Damping Rings (Guiducci)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/DR20091130A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once • Classification • Likely OK, pending small fixes.
4.5 RTML (Solyak)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RTML20091130B.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once • Classification • Likely OK.
4.6 ML (Nantista, Fukuda)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/ML20091130A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once • KCS known to be in WIP by authors • Important Comment • Pulse length issue needs to be explained. • Classification • Perhaps OK, pending authors’ timely response
4.7 BDS (Seryi)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/BDS20091130B.doc • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • Minor open issues fixable on the spot. • Classification • Likely OK, pending addressing phys/det vs accelerator interaction issues.
4.8 CFS (Kuchler)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/CFS20091130A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • Classification • Likely OK, pending small touch-ups.
5. Costing (Garbincius)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Cost20091120A.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • Yes • Author – Editor iteration? • Done once. • More text / tables known to be in WIP by the author. • Classification • Likely OK, pending some guideline clarification by PMs.
6. Risk Analysis (Ross)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RiskDraft20091105.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Author – Editor iteration? • No • Classification • Major schedule threat
A. Availability Analysis (MCR/Avail)http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/AvailDraft20091104.docx • Formatted Manuscript on the web? • No • Author – Editor iteration? • Authors known to be at it. ETA unclear. • Classification • Major schedule threat
Critical Issues • ML length • Path length matching known to be addressed • QWT compensation needs to be stated • Energy reserve needs to be stated • ML alternate pulsing • Handling of lowE beam in highE in ML needs to be stated • Costing Reference • “Starting point” needs to be stated • Summary statements need group-wide confirmation
Sections Recovering From Crisis • Intro / Overview • SRF Gradient
Sections in Crisis • Risk analysis • Availability
To Do at DESY Face-to-Face • Triage process • Critical open issues • Group-wide or semi-group wide discussion and surgery on the spot. • With some follow-up work on subsequent days. • Semi-trivial touch-ups • Identify issues on the spot. Fixes be applied by the primary authors on the fly. • With some follow-up work on subsequent days if needed. • ~17 subsections x 30 min = 9 hrs .eqv. 1 Full Day + reserve • Time is limited: We need to-the-point and concise-efficient discussion and response. No digressing speech, no tangential commentary, no unproductive ranting, please. • Prep and org for AAP • One quarter day